I wonder how many book purchases are impulse buys because a reader saw it whilst browsing in a store.
I know I’ve done it.
I know I’ve done it.
I harp on this in large part because I've too often been told that it's okay to pirate ebooks because they're just electronic files and not physical objects. As though, again, a book's cover price is really just to cover the cost of the paper and ink.
I find myself thinking about a humorous piracy deterrent spot that I've seen on some DVDs: somebody has just finished making an unauthorized copy of a DVD, and walks out the door to find his vehicle stolen from out of his driveway. Cut to the vehicle thieves, talking among themselves, and echoing the very sentiments the IP thief used to justify his acts.I wonder -- if someone got hold of their credit card numbers and emptied their accounts, would they think it was okay because it was just electronic money rather than paper?
My own problem with e-books is two-fold:
1. With an e-book, you are tied to a technological device as a middleman.
2. With an e-book, if that device fails or is replaced, you're screwed.
Which is to say, I have at least two DTI titles on my cheap-ass tablet. Which will soon be replaced by a Chromebook, because it was nearly useless when I bought it, and it's damn-near totally useless now.
I wonder -- if someone got hold of their credit card numbers and emptied their accounts, would they think it was okay because it was just electronic money rather than paper?
Often overlooked in discussing ebook vs print costs is that the added costs of print don’t stop at paper, ink, and binding; warehousing, shipping, and returns are a decent chunk of change as well. But ironically they’re also the reason you don’t see ebooks priced lower. Even if you could make the same profit on a digital copy at a lower price, you’d be running the risk of undermining the salesflow of the print run.
Those costs are just a small fraction of the cost of producing a book. You still have to pay the author, the editor, the copyeditor, the proofreader, the book designer, the cover artist, etc. The PP&B (paper, printing, and binding) costs are not where most of the expenses come from.
This finally clicked for me intuitively when I considered that you could get enough paper (heavier, higher quality paper, in fact) to make eight or so MMPBs in the form of a ream of printer paper for a few bucks at any office supply store.
Thanks for stressing that it was *not* what I suggested :-) I've just been told at my comic book store that the paper shortage in America has led even big guys like Marvel to print the bare minimum of copies to satisfy the preorderers. (Yes, of course, I'm aware of the fact that my store wants me to put in a preorder at their place ;-).) Since my city is a, uh, cultural hub, I have two friends working at publishers and they too say paper is a big problem. Going digital would seem to alleviate at least this issue.I harp on this in large part because I've too often been told that it's okay to pirate ebooks because they're just electronic files and not physical objects. As though, again, a book's cover price is really just to cover the cost of the paper and ink.
A different context, I know, and not at all what Elwro was suggesting, of course, but, alas, the idea is out there that somehow ebooks don't really cost publishers much to produce, so I push back against it whenever I get the chance.
Y'know, given that Simon & Schuster did put out To Lose the Earth a few months after the incompatible Picard season 1, I idly wonder if they would actually have the guts to still release Seek a Newer World and The Hazard of Concealing at this point.
Don't most e-book vendors allow you to access the book on more than one device? I've been able to read Kindle titles on both my laptop and my phone (though Kindle has stopped working on my laptop for some reason; did it stop supporting Windows 7 like MS Office did?).
In any event, I'm not terribly fond of ebook exclusives, but I do wonder about potential other formats. For instance, tordotcom seems to have had success with their line of original novellas -- including Una McCormack's The Undefeated -- and I think that would be a neat format to explore. Similar to the size of the old Bantam originals or even slightly shorter. Bite-sized, punchier adventures that offer the "episode experience" but don't require as much of a time investment if they're not your cup of tea. I for one would love to see a mix of heftier adventures with shorter ones.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.