Just from within Discovery's own narrative we've got Lorca, a guy who's official story is he scuttled his own ship and then got a better post, and Saru, a guy with no backbone or leadership skills ever shown getting the same ship. Meanwhile Burnham saved the universe twice and she still needs to prove herself. This is one of two things: a lead in to a story about how Black women can't catch a break even in 1000 years, or a story about Burnham needing to legitimately prove herself yet again with super tone-deaf optics. Either way it is slopping over with race and its implications.
I suppose it depends if you actually think the highest thing a character can aspire to in a series is to be the captain. Burnham has repeatedly shown herself to be a rule breaking maverick who constantly chafes at authority and disobeys orders. This is something longtime fans of the series hated about NuKirk. I absolutely love her as the star of the show but I was hoping Season 3's early parts were setting up for Burnham to realize that being a captain isn't for her. That she was better at being wild independent space hero.
But....its not where they went.
Of all the Kelvin movies, I really really like Into Darkness, but the Kelvin movies as a whole I have a problem with. If I was watching 'Star Trek Discovery' in a theater I might look at it more positively or forgivingly but as a series I'm just wondering, who is the audience? It's supposed to be the prime timeline but everything about it, especially the tone and the action just screams Kelvin timeline. It comes across as "generic Sci-fi show" than a Star Trek show.
I mean, it's been enough of a success that its effectively relaunched Star Trek in the prime timeline and it has been on television. I feel like 4 seasons in we can officially put to bed the argument Discovery isn't a success.