This is the new XO.
Burnham: Don't mind him, Dr. Culber has a traumatic history with Klingons.Vance: "Uh, yeah, my dad was half-Klingon. What of it?"
Well apparently there's enough of an audience that this show is the flagship of a streaming network that brought back Sir Patrick Stewart and there's a current global outcry over lack of international distribution to the point that cast members have commented on it. So to say that people are watching it is an understatement.Of all the Kelvin movies, I really really like Into Darkness, but the Kelvin movies as a whole I have a problem with. If I was watching 'Star Trek Discovery' in a theater I might look at it more positively or forgivingly but as a series I'm just wondering, who is the audience? It's supposed to be the prime timeline but everything about it, especially the tone and the action just screams Kelvin timeline. It comes across as "generic Sci-fi show" than a Star Trek show.
It's haircut makes it look like WWI German Helmet.This is the new XO.
Is it a true Tribble? We've never seen one move before!
We don't know Burnham didn't get therapy. She may have had tons of it. It's not remotely close to a magical bandaid in the real world (and I've seen one instance in a close family member of it actually making things severely worse, to the point we were contemplating lawsuits, but thankfully the damage wasn't permanent) and it's one of the things I can realistically believe hasn't advanced in the 32nd century (unless mind melds or other mind alteration is involved), unlike the rest of the tech which is really primitive (Detmer should have no implants now, the Kweijian should have emergency transwarp transporters out, etc.)A thing that really bugs me. If Starfleet knew Burnham had a martyr complex from childhood trauma… why hold it against her in her file? Why not try getting her the necessary therapy to overcome it?
You'd think in the 23rd and now 31st century... character flaws wouldn't be marks against you, but things that could easily be addressed. Not reasons to keep people down.
And the more I think about it, the more it infuriates me cause we have the optics of a "white" authority (a Karen, if you will) keeping a Black woman in her place.
I think we did in TAS: "More Tribbles, More Troubles", but I may be mistaken. I think I remember the giant tribble rolling around the Enterprise, but it's been many years so that could very possibly be an invention of my own brain haha.It looks like it's one that has lived a long time. Since it's bigger. But it definitely made the tribble sound.
She was just promoted to captain five months ago, which is a huge and rare privilege in itself. I don't really see not giving her a position that would be best suited for an experienced captain as "keeping her in her place," at least not in any negative way.And the more I think about it, the more it infuriates me cause we have the optics of a "white" authority (a Karen, if you will) keeping a Black woman in her place.
Not to mention that Burnham's lucky to even be considered at all being from 900 years in the past. This would be like us granting captainship of a modern military prototype submarine to a Byzantine Empire general, which would be controversial no matter how much catching up they did.She was just promoted to captain five months ago, which is a huge and rare privilege in itself. I don't really see not giving her a position that would be best suited for an experienced captain as "keeping her in her place."
In America, the president is commander in chief of the military. So I don't think it's entirely out of nowhere.TBH, I find the whole idea that the Federation president can decide who gets command of individual ships kind of...weird.
I mean, I know Trek has always been hazy on the difference between Starfleet and the Federation, and it's the 32nd century, but typically chief executives leave that sort of stuff to the military brass.
Just thought, with all this talk of the Voyager needing a captain, wonder if that might be the perfect spot for Saru.
It's just way too soon for Tilly to take command of Voyager and would probably add to the controversy she already had last season of being a cadet jumping to First Officer. Saru makes a lot more sense.I think they are setting that up for Tilly actually. Voyager is known as the first Trek show to have a female lead so they aren't going to put a male character in charge of a ship that is honoring that series. I think they explored Suru as a Captain as much as they already want. I could see Saru being put in charge of Starfleet Academy and the guy who created the Burn joining up so they are reunited. In fact my theory is going into next season is lots of the characters will be splintered off and it will be built around them all coming back together for a big mission or something like that.
Twice.
Romulus in the Prime Timeline to give Nero the motivation for revenge and Vulcan in the Kelvin Timeline to affect both Spocks.
I don't think there's any racial aspect to the President and Burnham's working relationship at all, and I welcome criticism of Discovery but honestly this feels kind of a stretch to me. Certainly Sonequa would never have done these scenes if she felt there was a racial underdone.
It's just way too soon for Tilly to take command of Voyager and would probably add to the controversy she already had last season of being a cadet jumping to First Officer. Saru makes a lot more sense.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.