
Oops! I posted it while I was heading out the door and I didn't notice the typo. It's fixed now!The thread title is giving me a headache. :-(
I don't pay attention to these things most of the time but shouldn't that be expected? I would expect paying audiences, especially early ones, to be people who are really interested in seeing the movie and would likely be inclined to respond more positively.As I expected, the audience score is much higher than the critics score.
I'm going into this almost exactly with the way I went into Guardians of the Galaxy - practically zero knowledge about the source material. So I'm hoping to have the same overwhelmingly positive reaction I did back then.
What?the other that they had no idea what was happening.
Well, they did do a number of flashbacks to other times, so it wasn't exactly linear, but no it wasn't hard to follow. The ONLY Entetnals comics I ever read was the very first limited series run in the late 1970s (I was 12) - so yeah, the story here was new to me as about the only thing I knew was some of the character names, the Overmind (executed quite differently from what I remember) and in the comics the Celestials modified DNA to create mankind, and thr Deviants were remnants of previous attempts); so the Eternals just being here to kill predators so intelligent life could arise, all that was new to me.What?We are talking about a quite linear movie here. It's a Marvel flick after all. Not Tenet or whatever
Oh, nice catch. I didn't even think of that!That gives Patton Oswalt the Marvel trifecta. Marvel Television, Marvel Animation and Marvel Studios.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.