• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Predator: Badlands

How do you rate Predator: Badlands?

  • A-

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • B-

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • C+

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • C

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • C-

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • D+

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • D

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • D-

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • F

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    10
I get the impression the Yautja we see are the remnants of more advanced society that fell. They're like the Mad Max of whatever society built space ships and computers.

Doesn't have to be. Their society could also be similar to Samurai/Japanese society in that the vast part of the Yautja are not hunters but workers, engineers and scientists that serve the ruling class of the Hunters, kind of a caste system with the top being the ones born to hunt.

We just never saw this in the movies because that was never the focus so the field is wide open for speculation.
 
That and alien species aren't monoliths. Who is to say all Yautja are the same united society?
Well there are Yautja clans, so I don't think they are all united. I think Thia actually mentions studying Yautja society extensively, and doesn't mention much else about them other than they are hunters.

Of course that's not dispositive.
 
Last edited:
Doesn't have to be. Their society could also be similar to Samurai/Japanese society in that the vast part of the Yautja are not hunters but workers, engineers and scientists that serve the ruling class of the Hunters, kind of a caste system with the top being the ones born to hunt.

We just never saw this in the movies because that was never the focus so the field is wide open for speculation.
Well of course it doesn't have to be. The Yautja are so I'll defined each entry in the franchise can drop in whatever lore it wants about them.

The Mad Max thing is just my impression.
 
To be honest i really dislike attitudes like this because it creates a creative standstill. Every story that turns into a franchise because the initial movie story turned out to be very popular can quickly find itself with a heavy weight around its neck if it doesn't break out of that rut.

Terminator has this problem, how many times do we need to see Skynet sending a Terminator back in time to prevent the rise of the Resistance by killing someone? How many times do we need to see a Predator go on the hunt only to be defeated by the movie hero?

How much can a franchise be kept afloat if it repeats the same story over and over and only varies the details?

Yes, this was not a Predator movie in the same mold much like Prey was. Prey to me was the template Predator movie but it also was kind of a jumpstart to something else. It was followed by Killer of Killers that tried something new ( and introduced a very controversial subject at the same time) and Badlands continues this trend by going completely off the beaten path and i really like this boldness.

The movie was quite good, not original Predator level awesome but what is? I loved that they are now expanding the universe and for the fist time in a canon project they call them Yautja and give them a culture beyond just being hunters for the most dangerous prey. The production value was appropriately high ( how the hell did they pull off Dek's face, was that all CGI or practical effects? It looked amazing), the story good enough ( dragged a bit in the second act) and it opened a door to possible follow up projects.

I hope Trachtenberg gets to continue with his Predatorverse projects, Badlands has been very positively reviewed across the board and the audience liked it including me.
Exactly why I was bored with the Alien franchise. A lot of it is just a slight variation of the same. I give credit to the people running the Predator franchise - they are mixing it up, like the MCU did in it's first few years (a variety of genres).
 
All Aliens has been good for lately is fodder for drinking games. Bet on who died first or who survives to the credits (that's not an appealing kid - c'mon, you knew Newt wasn't gonna die) or some such.
 
Tess and Thia being so different is kinda explained, but it did not really seem like a satisfying explanation. The Synths as synthetic beings should be in radio or wifi transmission of each other on some network, and should not be unaware of each other's encounters or status (this becomes particularly ridiculous at the climax).

I have a pet theory that an explanation got cut about the planet generating interference that makes such wireless communication difficult to impossible, thus we get Thia and Tess when separated developing independently. It's just a theory. 🤷‍♂️

Maybe one of them burnt their modem ;)
 
Loved the film but experience ruined by how terrible and dim image was in cinema - my mistake for not going to IMAX or Dolby Cinema where standards enforced!
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top