I mean it's the biggest outstanding plot!


I've heard things from people who've already read book two that indicate a difference in tone from book one, so here's hoping.The problem is that the stakes are so high, it's like there are no stakes. It seems like they're leading up to the litverse getting erased or sacrificed or whatever for the sake of the multiverse. So when everyone's eventually going to get wiped out anyway, it doesn't hit as hard when major characters die. And when they pile up character deaths, especially in a relatively perfunctory way, it all starts to feel like nothing matters.
I haven't read that much of the litverse, but I understand why people aren't thrilled when the universe they have been reading for 20 years ends up as a "diseased tree branch" that might need to be pruned. I was hoping they would position the litverse as an alternative, equally valid reality and just wrap things up without trashing it on the way out. But there are still 2 books left...
Without having read Book 2 yet, I agree. Yes, Lucasfilm just abandoned the Legends continuity without any sense of closure, but at least one could still imagine those stories are still ongoing in some other reality. The Trek Litverse on the other hand might be getting closure, but based on Coda Book 1 that closure is everyone getting killed and the universe getting destroyed. Is that supposed to be more comforting than just cutting bait and walking away from that continuity?I hope so; I found book one fairly brutal, and so far don't see how this is "better" than what Lucasfilm did - wholesale, breathless massacre of established characters was not what I was looking for!
Without having read Book 2 yet, I agree. Yes, Lucasfilm just abandoned the Legends continuity without any sense of closure, but at least one could still imagine those stories are still ongoing in some other reality. The Trek Litverse on the other hand might be getting closure, but based on Coda Book 1 that closure is everyone getting killed and the universe getting destroyed. Is that supposed to be more comforting than just cutting bait and walking away from that continuity?
Would it be worse to have a favorite character dead after the reboot, or altered significantly?
After the end happens I'll be happy to see any book character brought to the prime/newlit timeline. I'm gonna actively hope that by the end of this trilogy they save the universe and life goes on for them. I'm hoping for the Tng ending and we get some of our dead friends back before it's over.
Icheb and Seven get real shafted in the prime timeline versus their litverse counterparts. Like way shafted.
Honestly, he deserves it for those tweets. But I don't think they made his death any more gory because of it. The gore was just to serve Seven's story.Icheb, I can understand. His only appearance in PIC was definitely shaftey.
Indeed, I suspect that part of the reason Icheb was killed off so graphically and brutally was a back-handed insult to Manu Intiraymi.
Sort of like "we don't like you, so not only are we going to get somebody else to play the role you worked so hard to build, but we're going to immediately kill him with massive amounts of torture porn."
Honestly, he deserves it for those tweets.
Why, what did he say?
And how does this affect his ability to play Icheb? Does it have anything to do with the show? In the end, what does it matter?
Icheb, I can understand. His only appearance in PIC was definitely shaftey.
Indeed, I suspect that part of the reason Icheb was killed off so graphically and brutally was a back-handed insult to Manu Intiraymi.
Sort of like "we don't like you, so not only are we going to get somebody else to play the role you worked so hard to build, but we're going to immediately kill him with massive amounts of torture porn."
But how was Seven "shafted"? She had an important part to play in PIC. I don't see that as an insult at all.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.