Surely using Kodos would be more appropriate hereKilling half....a snap....
![]()
I think you're pulling our legs.
Surely using Kodos would be more appropriate hereKilling half....a snap....
![]()
I think you're pulling our legs.
And the Fandom Meance would still find a way to hate it... even though it would've given them everything they wanted.Yes, but they shouldn't stop at one. They should blow up the ship and end the show.
And kill Burnham three different ways. Just because.
Harry Mudd is that you?Yes, but they shouldn't stop at one. They should blow up the ship and end the show.
And kill Burnham three different ways. Just because.
And kill Burnham three different ways. Just because.
I was thinking. Doug Jones is brilliant playing different aliens with different looks. What if they killed Saru but kept Doug Jones as a regular. Tilly has to become second in command. Meanwhile Doug Jones a strange alien who joins the ship and then stays as a regular. It would shake things up maybe.
Having is not so satisfying as wanting.And the Fandom Meance would still find a way to hate it... even though it would've given them everything they wanted.![]()
Or they could, you know, just have a decent plot. That would be sufficient.Yes, but they shouldn't stop at one. They should blow up the ship and end the show.
And kill Burnham three different ways. Just because.
Why say "a character like Saru" when you mean "Saru"? The title already implied that you were being a little facetious, because why call out a specific character at all, but then you don't even suggest killing any of the other characters.
You would.Would love it to be Burnham
Plus it's pretty fucking insensitive to what's going on in the United States (and has been going on, but we're finally giving it the attention it's due). It's my one hang up with Picard. Right off the bat they killed off The Black Guy. Unless they were trying to draw a parallel between the Zhat Vash and the Police, that move was in very poor taste. To put it into an understatement. They shouldn't have done that.Book would make sense I guess but don't care about the character that much so his death wouldn't hit home.
You would.
Plus it's pretty fucking insensitive to what's going on in the United States (and has been going on, but we're finally giving it the attention it's due). It's my one hang up with Picard. Right off the bat they killed off The Black Guy. Unless they were trying to draw a parallel between the Zhat Vash and the Police, that move was in very poor taste. To put it into an understatement. They shouldn't have done that.
That was the basic gist of my "you would".Killing Burnham would be equally insensitive. You know, come to think of it I can't remember ever seeing on this board someone posting that they would like a white female character to die. I legitimately can't. I've seen things like 'Janeway should have been sent to jail' but I've never seen people clamoring for her death, like a couple of people in this thread.
Just adds to my theory that some people are fine seeing a black woman do the sci-fi equivalent of answer the telephone but heaven help the black woman that is outspoken and tells a white man what to do.
She doesn't have to die. She can transfer off. The main idea is to take the best aspects of the show and restructure it like Fear of the Walking Dead did when they replaced Madison with Morgan. Or Babylon 5 with Sheridan over Sinclair. I think the show has plenty of interesting characters but is held back do to Burnham being boring. But even if do keep her you can also still find other ways to restructure. Make her a drug addict or erase everyone's memories of her. Kill her but keep a Android version on the show. Stuff like that.Killing Burnham would be equally insensitive. You know, come to think of it I can't remember ever seeing on this board someone posting that they would like a white female character to die. I legitimately can't. I've seen things like 'Janeway should have been sent to jail' but I've never seen people clamoring for her death, like a couple of people in this thread.
Just adds to my theory that some people are fine seeing a black woman do the sci-fi equivalent of answer the telephone but heaven help the black woman that is outspoken and tells a white man what to do.
Something I told someone the other day: "Yes, I think it's still a problem to this day. Someone can claim they don't have a problem with someone who's black or someone who's a woman, but as soon as it's someone who's both, they start acting differently. It's like the prejudice doesn't add, it multiplies."
The attitude towards Michael is just so bizarre. It's not enough to reduce her time and focus on other characters. Nope, let's kill her. She's too good at everything.
She doesn't have to die. She can transfer off. The main idea is to take the best aspects of the show and restructure it like Fear of the Walking Dead did when they replaced Madison with Morgan. Or Babylon 5 with Sheridan over Sinclair. I think the show has plenty of interesting characters but is held back do to Burnham being boring. But even if do keep her you can also still find other ways to restructure. Make her a drug addict or erase everyone's memories of her. Kill her but keep a Android version on the show. Stuff like that.
Agree. It becomes this meld of misogyny and racism with a measure of uppity negroism thrown in for good measure
At the same time, she's apparently terrible at everything as well. The haters just can't decide. Shrodinger's Burnham.
Nice backpedal, but that is not what i got from your comments 'would love for it to be burnham', while implying that the deaths of white female characters would engender an emotional response from you that wasn't sheer delight.
There were a lot of bad ideas in this post but this is the probably the second worst, after killing off the lead of the show!Next season for variety do a comedic theme season were the ship is taken over by a Q.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.