• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

CBS/Paramount sues to stop Axanar 2 - Electric Boogaloo-Fanboys gone WILD-too many hyphens

Do you enjoy pie?

  • Yes, sweet, please

    Votes: 79 40.9%
  • Yes, savory, please

    Votes: 42 21.8%
  • Yes, any kind

    Votes: 80 41.5%
  • No, I'm a heathen

    Votes: 37 19.2%

  • Total voters
    193
I didn't watch season 3 of DISCO or Lower Decks so can't comment on that but DISCO s1/2 and Pic S1 sure does focus on those. Unless of course forced organ harvesting, slavery, concentration camps, future crackhead deadbeat moms, mutiny and murder committed by main characters with little to no consequence, and genocide commited or condoned by Federation citizens or the Federation itself doesn't qualify for your personal definition of suffering or injustice...
So, you're saying it's Star Trek?
 
I believe “Paradise Lost” was intentionally dystopian. It was the whole point of the episode, really, hence the title. :shrug:
 
There's a difference between making an occasional dark episode and a totally dystopian universe.
 
I believe “Paradise Lost” was intentionally dystopian. It was the whole point of the episode, really, hence the title. :shrug:
I couldn't disagree more. If it had been about dystopia, then the security guards on every corner would have stayed forever.

The whole point of the episode is simply that the characters realize that the Federation isn't a utopia after all. You can interpret the title "Paradise Lost" to mean that it's about dystopia only if you think that Adam and Eve being expelled from the Garden of Eden means that they were sent to live in a dystopia. That would be a very warped view of the term, because it would mean that all mortal existence is inherently dystopian, in which case it would be an utterly meaningless term.
 
Never saw TNGs two-part episode "Chain Of Command" I assume as that two-part episode had some way more disturbing scenes than the death of Icheb from Picard S1.

Also, if it is a favourite character, someone might be very angry - but not over the death of a character that was not a personal favourite.

And we don't really want a situation, do we, where every returning character is assumed to be have a charmed life and can never die? Life doesn't work that way.
 
Last edited:
Unless of course forced organ harvesting
Not in the Federation. Thus the whole Fenris Rangers bit.
future crackhead deadbeat moms
There was more than one? No, there was not. There was a person who was struggling with past pain.
mutiny and murder committed by main characters with little to no consequence
The person who committed a mutiny went to jail.
genocide commited or condoned by Federation citizens or the Federation itself doesn't qualify for your personal definition of suffering or injustice...
So, Star Trek? Because that's happened before, and never has gone through, just like in this show.

So, no, it doesn't qualify under that definition of dystopia because it is doing things Star Trek has always done. Shown aspects of human nature, both dark and light, and how to become better. Hell, I might not give a lot of credit to Axanar but the entire Prelude thing was about a war and how it could cause them to give in to fear of the Klingons. It's not dystopian to struggle when faced with so much pain and death.
 
I didn't watch season 3 of DISCO or Lower Decks so can't comment on that but DISCO s1/2 and Pic S1 sure does focus on those. Unless of course forced organ harvesting,

VOY S1 Ep 5 "Phage."


TOS S1 Ep 0 "The Cage."

concentration camps,

DS9, S3 Eps 11 and 12, "Past Tense, Parts I & II."

future crackhead deadbeat moms,

First off: The invocation of the stereotype of a "crackhead" in reference to a black woman is, whether you consciously intended it to be or not, a very racist thing to say. I'm sure you didn't intend it, but it is. I strongly urge you not to do that again.

Secondly: With regards to the idea of sympathetic characters who are bad parents:

TOS S2 Ep 15 "Journey to Babel." Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan. DS9 S6 Ep 3 "Sons and Daughters."

With regards to sympathetic characters with substance abuse problems: Star Trek: First Contact. T'Pol and Trellium-D in ENT S3.

mutiny... committed by main characters with little to no consequence

TOS S1 Eps 15 & 16, "The Menagerie, Parts I & II." TOS S2 Ep 5 "Amok Time." TOS S3 Ep 24 "Turnabout Intruder." Star Trek III: The Search for Spock. Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home. Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country. TNG S4 Ep 3 "Brothers." TNG S7 Ep 12 "The Pegasus." DS9 S1 Ep 18 "Dramatis Personae." DS9 S3 Ep 21 "The Die is Cast." Star Trek: First Contact. Star Trek: Inusrrection. VOY S7 Ep 4 "Repression."

Etc.

and murder committed by main characters

Violent acts committed by main characters acting under the influence of alien mind control or mind-altering phenomenon have never been depicted as legally binding upon the characters. No one court-martialed Geordi for trying to assassinate the Klingon ambassador under Romulan mind control in "The Mind's Eye." No one held Data, Troi, or O'Brien responsible for their actions in "Power Play." No one held Picard criminally liable for the deaths of thousands of Federation citizens he perpetuated as Locutus in "The Best of Both Worlds, Part II."

genocide commited or condoned by Federation citizens or the Federation itself

TNG S2 Ep 15 "Pen Pals." TNG S7 Ep 13 "Homeward."

Berman trek showed the cracks in the surface of the utopia that Roddenberry set up as the exception to the rule whereas current trek not only focuses on them but shoves a crowbar into them to make them bigger so as to make them the default.

No, they're still the exceptions to the rule.
 
Not that I actually have a problem with dystopian fiction, but the Federation being reduced to a handful of planets and nearly being wiped out by a single aggressive faction seems kinda dystopian. Things do improve over the course of the season, though, but Kevin Sorbo could show up at any moment.
 
First, the poster in question hadn’t watched season 3 of Disco so that’s not really being discussed. But if it were, isn’t the issue more of where the story leaves us as opposed to where it begins? Even still, every step along the way in that season shows hope. Hell, the first and last episodes are called “That Hope is You.”

(Queue the commentary that everything in Disco is about Burnham.)
 
So was TOS dystopian in "The Cloud Minders?" How about TNG in "Justice," "Angel One," "The Vengeance Factor"?

What about "Patterns of Force"? Dystopia? Or something for Kirk and crew to fix? DS9 "Battle Lines," "Far Beyond the Stars," "The Quickening"? :shrug:

...What?

TNG S2 Ep 15 "Pen Pals." TNG S7 Ep 13 "Homeward."

Also the EMH Mk 1s being used as slaves in a mine in Voyager.

I've noticed that many of the older Trek episodes pointed to as validations of the darker aspects of the Federation in newer Trek are absolutely horrible episodes that I've always hated...

Luckily for us, Michael Burnham is a far more interesting character played by a far more talented actor than Alex's Garth of Izar, the centrepiece around which Axanar orbits.

Well, I'll certainly grant you the better actor point...
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top