• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers 31st/32nd Century Ships Revealed

Excellent list! Although I always wondered why the Kelpians would adopt the Federation three-letter prefix standard for ship naming using "KSF". But, I guess there's already precedent with the "IKV" prefix for Klingon ships in the 24th century, so... I can only assume it's the Universal Translator doing that, but it still seems slightly contrived to me.
 
That makes sense. In real life, the NATO assigned ship prefixes to other navies even when they didn't have any.
Now we just need to figure out what forces those prefixed ships to also align top-down every time they meet in space. :D
 
Excellent list! Although I always wondered why the Kelpians would adopt the Federation three-letter prefix standard for ship naming using "KSF". But, I guess there's already precedent with the "IKV" prefix for Klingon ships in the 24th century, so... I can only assume it's the Universal Translator doing that, but it still seems slightly contrived to me.

There was the "IKS Gr'oth" in the 23rd century, at least per Dax in Trials & Tribble-ations, among several other DS9 episodes.
 
Ah, yes. I think IKV was the STO version of that. Same core problem, though. I get all the implausible alien-English transliterations all mixed up sometimes, particularly if the UT decides to suddenly experience a region-wide outage whenever the Klingons show up and start bellowing at people in tlhIngan Hol. ;)
 
It is possible that they simply became standard over time, or grew up independently. I recently read a study discussing that "mama" and "papa" as names for parents extends across multiple human languages yet some simply developed independently of one another.
 
It is possible that they simply became standard over time, or grew up independently. I recently read a study discussing that "mama" and "papa" as names for parents extends across multiple human languages yet some simply developed independently of one another.
Same thing for "pyramid".
/O\
 
Several species use the three-letter prefix. The Romulans have their IRW and PWB, the Klingons have their IKS and IKC, the Iyaarans had BCD, and there was the list of prefixes seen on the ship list in "Whispers".
 
The Gav'Nor is a Cardassian vessel affiliated with the Federation. It might not have the USS and the NCC.
Initially, I thought it might have the common post-war prefixes CDS (Cardassian Defense Ship) or CUV (Cardassian Union Vessel). The novel Wonderlands establishes a Captain Culbreath as commanding officer, indicating the presence of non-Cardassian crew.
 
A cleaned up Armstrong
TdRBq1U.jpg
 
So there is no 32rd century visual expression for "big guns".

It was fun for TNG to make the big contrast to the TOS movies there, showing that it's the future by turning beads (which might approximate old-fashioned gunbarrels in twin turrets) into strips (which are sheer scifi). Perhaps DSC can still come up with a fancy idea or two?

I like the asymmetry of those window slits. Perhaps one can open a window anywhere one wants, at the push of an interface? Or at least anywhere in those grooves on the surface.

Timo Saloniemi
 
A refit zero-houring the ship right after TOS would give 20, more or less. And Morrow would definitely go for more.

But brand new ships get retired ITRW: it's all about demand, not supply. If a whole class is showing its age, then a casualty replacement built two years ago can become a grievous misinvestment and is better scrapped to give way for an all-new class and its associated support infrastructure.

Timo Saloniemi
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top