Clear as day Sharon is the Power Broker.
So how did Cap return then? He went to an alternate timeline to return the stones. It's alternate because Thanos is dead. Loki is still alive. Things are changed. They explained it in the movie. If you change something in the past it creates a new timeline. Those were the rules they made.He didn't use the Stark time travel doohickey to return to the present though. If he did, he would have appeared on the time travel pad, not on a park bench... unless Stark built one into the bench without anyone else knowing.
Far from Home takes place after F&WS I believe.To be fair, Far from Home is the only post-Blip movie released so far, and while its depiction of the world post-Blip might seem incongruous with what we've seen so far in WandaVision and F&WS, that movie was also a co-production with Sony so that could explain some of it. Homecoming was pretty incongruous, too; "eight years later," anyone?
So how did Cap return then? He went to an alternate timeline to return the stones. It's alternate because Thanos is dead. Loki is still alive. Things are changed. They explained it in the movie. If you change something in the past it creates a new timeline. Those were the rules they made.
I think the safe bet is Cap went to a alternate timeline because he wouldn't just stop trying to help people meaning their should be all sorts of heroic evidence he did in the 50's and 60's and so forth. Jason
An alternate timeline is only formed when a timestone is remove, and then the alternate timeline ceases to exist when the stone is returned. Loki has a time stone that was never returned.
Which means that he didn't return one of the stones for a long time?
The upcoming "What if...?" series is going to disagree with you on that.An alternate timeline is only formed when a timestone is remove, and then the alternate timeline ceases to exist when the stone is returned. Loki has a time stone that was never returned.
You can't go to your own past.
You can't go to any past, considering the space stone was still in New York in 2012, after Cap stole it from that Army Base in 1970.
An alternate timeline is created always.
An alternate timeline is only formed when a timestone is remove, and then the alternate timeline ceases to exist when the stone is returned. Loki has a time stone that was never returned.
That scene is one of the most convoluted, Plot Convenient explanations ever committed to film--and because the writers knew audiences with about as much "knowledge" about time travel as they did (i.e. science fiction / pop culture references) would question what Hulk said, they have him shoot down all other fictional ideas of time travel, which--in all honestly--do not make less sense than the Hulk's theory.
Lex is a rich guy, I'm sure with a butler too. To me, Zemo is more coming across as a Bond villain.Nah, it fits. It's up there with Back to the Futures' explanations.
Anywho, would we rate Zemo more as MCU Batman or MCU Lex Luthor?
His explanation as to why he is against Super-Soldiers (Superheroes in general) remind me of Lex, but he's a rich guy with a butler so I get Batman vibes too.
Nah, it fits. It's up there with Back to the Futures' explanations.
Anywho, would we rate Zemo more as MCU Batman or MCU Lex Luthor?
His explanation as to why he is against Super-Soldiers (Superheroes in general) remind me of Lex, but he's a rich guy with a butler so I get Batman vibes too.
It doesn't fit because one of the Russo's insists that at the end that that is their Cap who went back and stayed back, which breaks the damn rule they made.
Lex is a rich guy, I'm sure with a butler too. To me, Zemo is more coming across as a Bond villain.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.