2/10. Definitely didn't like it. The rub-your-nose-in-it metaphors at the end were painful. For the forth time I think a full season of Kurtzman Trek is blown.
Are you sure you actually like Trek?
2/10. Definitely didn't like it. The rub-your-nose-in-it metaphors at the end were painful. For the forth time I think a full season of Kurtzman Trek is blown.
they finally did it! they closed the damn shuttlebay!
Honestly, I feel like the biggest mistake this season was the two-parter for Georgiou.
Don't get me wrong - I liked it, particularly Part 1. But the actual season arc could desperately have used those two episodes for something more relevant. They could have left Georgiou behind in the 23rd century at the end of Season 2, and basically had this two parter be the prologue to her own series (including using Discovery sets and cast) with only minimal changes.
But including it in the season effectively made a 15-episode season a 13-episode season.
Which is basically a pandering, confused, obvious conclusion of last weeks' main storilines. There was literally nothing of interest there, one could skip the whole episode, read your two lines and go directly to the last few scenes without missing on anything.I think the episode had a pretty well-developed plot.
A plot: Burnham (and to a lesser extent Book, Owo, Tilly) defeat Osyraa and the Regulators, return to the Nebula
B plot: Saru convinces Su'Kal to turn off the simulation.
Quite agreed on this.Where Discovery has always struggled more is where it comes to themes. They did exist in this episode, but the writers had to sledgehammer it home with a Burnham monologue in the epilogue. Otherwise we never would have known the conclusions were were supposed to draw other than "the good guys won."
And I did it. Twice. It's not what I wrote.You actually didn't answer my question. The reason I asked you to confirm whether or not your position is that there's no plot at all
I said that there is almost no plot, almost everything can pretty much be summed up with eschaton's remarks above. As I already wrote, these three episodes could have been compressed down to two without any real loss.If you think there was some plot, no matter how thin, then we agree there was a plot and there's no real point in me wasting time.
Please don't ascribe to others emotions and intentions that are not necessarily there.You don't bother me, you just don't interest me very much. I didn't reply to you, you replied to me in an indignant fashion asking me to show what the plot was. I said in the original post I've got no problem people hating the plot.
I added that because usually when someone criticises something about a discovery episode gets labeled as an "hater".I'm not sure who you're quoting there, but I've not labelled you a hater and I have no intention of doing so. You replied to me, I wasn't chasing you down for anything. You can hate it or love it all you want.
the upgrades were done with the same tecnology the other ships are supposed to have…First, The Discovery had received so many upgrades, it's not the same ship anymore...
You would lose such bet quite easily. But even if that was not the case, consider that there was a 800 or so period of advancements before the middle ages in this series.Second, due to ramifications of the Burn, the other ships were not necessarily stronger or more powerful, just like a Roman soldier would probably not be automatically beat by a knight from the Dark Ages 1000+ more advanced... In fact, my bets would be on the Roman.
So it seems.So its wrong to think this was up there with the worst Trek but absolutely fine to think its one of the best episodes ever.
This is a very good observation. I wonder if the script was edited quite a few times, a bit like what happened with TMP, and the chase was at a ceertain point moved from the HQ to Discovery. This would explain the huge, nonsensical spaces and also why a lot of ideas from the previous episodes are either dropped completely or barely referenced.The turbolift fight and its visuals. This made me feel like this was orginally planned to take place aboard Starfleet HQ.
Good question. I *think* Saru wanted also to access to his mother's logs. One might imagine Grey might have been able to do it earlier in the episode, when he managed to exit the simulation, but that's probably incorrect as he couldn't phisically operate the consolles once he left the holodeck and lost his corporeal form.So, something I'm not really sure about. Why did Sa'Kul have to shut down the simulation? Was there something stopping them from beaming out while it was on?
I mean, thematically, it made sense, but logically it didn't. What they really needed was to be rescued from the planet, not out of the holodeck.
I think they are deliberately staying away from this kind of "too scienty" answers. Can't blame them, honestly.So how fast exactly is their maximum warp now? I wish they gave us a sense of distance between destinations so we could get an idea.
Vulcan is very close to Earth and they got here in under an hour. They can’t be that far from Earth then
But that’s what makes Star Trek. It’s just Star Wars then.I think they are deliberately staying away from this kind of "too scienty" answers. Can't blame them, honestly.
But that’s what makes Star Trek. It’s just Star Wars then.
I'm not sure I wan't to go there!But that’s what makes Star Trek. It’s just Star Wars then.
mmmhhh…buuuurn……Star Wars is a conservative/romanticist view that looks back to the past as a time of greatness. Star Trek is a progressive/utopian view that looks forward to the future.
MMMHHH…burnhaaamStar Wars is a universe of "chosen ones," fate, and destiny. Star Trek is a universe of free will and competent individuals working together as a team to get the job done.
MMMHHH! Ok, saved at last minute last week. Phew.Star Wars is a universe of good versus evil. Star Trek is a universe where the antagonists who come up against the protagonists have their own agendas which are deeper than "evil for teh lulz."
And TOS has a parallel Earth in Miri, down to the use of the alphabet... There was no explanation apart from quoting a theory from Hodgkin. But DSC is the ‘magic’ one...?But that’s what makes Star Trek. It’s just Star Wars then.
Well, that -and several wonky stuff from TOS- has been widely criticised for decades. And mostly ignored when they tried to be more serious in the latter series (which, of course, slipped as well here and there).And TOS has a parallel Earth in Miri, down to the use of the alphabet... There was no explanation apart from quoting a theory from Hodgkin. But DSC is the ‘magic’ one...?
There was more than a bit of a star wars vibe with the regulators (storm troopers) the sphere data/maintenance bots (r2-d2) and Book (hans solo)But that’s what makes Star Trek. It’s just Star Wars then.
Wasn't here more than one of these "period piece" planets in TOS ?And TOS has a parallel Earth in Miri, down to the use of the alphabet... There was no explanation apart from quoting a theory from Hodgkin. But DSC is the ‘magic’ one...?
Which sort of confirms that they were holding back originally. And also suggests that they still aren't allowed to go all out.
Timo Saloniemi
So what race is Adria supposed to be? I was thinking Jayla’s from Beyond but she didn’t have those ear pieces
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.