^
Good points!
Good points!

And universal translators that will suddenly ignore the translation of certain Klingon (and occasionally other alien) words for dramatic effect.![]()
How many people here hated: "Star Trek II The Wrath of Khan"?
I ask because the entire setup for that film is the fact that the USS Reliant couldn't tell that:
- Ceti Alpha VI exploded in a star system that was well mapped.
- That somehow Ceti Alpha V was blown/moved into the exact same orbital path that Ceti Alpha VI had previously occupied.
- Couldn't tell that there was a breathable atmosphere on Ceti Alpha VI (And there was because all Khan and his followers were wearing were breathing filters. No one was wearing a sealed EVA style suit).
How many people here hated: "Star Trek II The Wrath of Khan"?
I ask because the entire setup for that film is the fact that the USS Reliant couldn't tell that:
- Ceti Alpha VI exploded in a star system that was well mapped.
- That somehow Ceti Alpha V was blown/moved into the exact same orbital path that Ceti Alpha VI had previously occupied.
- Couldn't tell that there was a breathable atmosphere on Ceti Alpha VI (And there was because all Khan and his followers were wearing were breathing filters. No one was wearing a sealed EVA style suit).
Yeah I can see why Star Trek fans really hate "Star Trek Ii The Wrath of Khan'... Oh wait.
So yeah if there ever has been a period of:
"Jar Jar JJ Abrams style Trek..." where the writers really don't care about details...
^^^
It started long before Star Trek Discovery hit the airwaves / streaming services.
Configuration and metallurgy simply mean that the same dish & whale belly & nacelles arrangement and tritanium type was used in those centuries.On a related note: they've given Picard cover to include Discovery ships, if it wants to use any of the designs from the first two seasons. The EDF identifies Discovery's design configuration and construction as being from the 23rd to 25th Century.
It also gives an in-universe explanation for why there were so many TOS Movie ship designs in TNG and DS9.
We don't need big galaxy ending villains all the time. Sometimes you don't need villains at allOk, so far we've had only minor villains, and the last one is not even really a real one. Control turned in his grave!!!!
Miranda's didn't last long against the dominionTo be clear, I was talking about 24th Century ships in my post. That's why I referred to the Defiant.
I don't think there was as much of a difference between 23rd Century and 24th Century ships as there was between the 22nd and 23rd.
The colony has an explosion and a fire. It is in the situation described in the episode of the series. So it is logical that it sends a ship on a journey of more than ten years. After 10 years when the ship has not returned, the only logical conclusion is that it is the fault of Earth. Indeed, it is nothing but 'flawless writing'.Yes I do as 4.37 ly would be perfectly reachable by sublight drive as impulse can reach high fractions of light. It would explain why the lost colony only sent a handful of ships and earth just never bothered.
Also that their scanners, which were supposed to be able to determine if there was even so much as a microbe of life on the planet, were unable to determine that there was Khan and what, at least a dozen or so followers, plus the eel and its babies.
The scanners picked up something, but they couldn't tell what. That's why they were theorizing about pre animate matter. What was actually happening was that the sensors were being blocked by the dust storm more than the crew thought they were.
So a dust storm can foul super advanced sensors from space. That's great technology.
Welcome to Star Trek!![]()
Feel grateful I suppose that at the very least, unlike Star Wars movies, Star Trek seems to have a slight understanding of how orbital mechanics works. I.e., we've never seen a bomb pushed off of a suttlebay and immediately falling to a planet's surface.
I know, I know.
That's not much of a consolation.... But then I don't view Star Wars as science fiction but as fantasy with a veneer of science fiction.
To be fair they wanted to use John Colicos as Kor in three more episodes over the next two and a half years TOS ran; but he was busy in theater and when they needed him his schedule never allowed it. He did say in an interview he would have loved to have the opportunity to reprise the role during the original series; and it was why he was happy to have the opportunity when DS9 producers offered it to him.TOS was weekly episodic television but the only villains who appeared more than once over 80 episodes including "The Cage" were Harry Mudd and the Keeper of the Talosians, and by the time of "The Menagerie, Part II" he was no longer a villain. Even in TNG the only recurring villains were Q, Tomalak and DaiMon Bok.
Because it is fantasy.. Star Trek isn't much harder in the science realm, despite occasional bolts of brilliance.I know, I know.
That's not much of a consolation.... But then I don't view Star Wars as science fiction but as fantasy with a veneer of science fiction.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.