But, why does it need it? It receives the accolades now and it has top tier recognition. What more bones does it need?Not at all. I just wish DS9 got thrown a few more bones. TOS, TNG, VOY, and ENT seem to get them the most.

But, why does it need it? It receives the accolades now and it has top tier recognition. What more bones does it need?Not at all. I just wish DS9 got thrown a few more bones. TOS, TNG, VOY, and ENT seem to get them the most.
Sorry.But, why does it need it? It receives the accolades now and it has top tier recognition. What more bones does it need?![]()
No need for an apology. I'm genuinely confused on this point.Sorry.
I think a lot of people would like to see what happened to some of the characters the show pampered so much and what influence the happenings had on the galaxy in the long run. DS9 had actually a lot of common with todays era of television, but it seems to be the least recognized one.
I mean, Quark gets a name drop in Picard.I think a lot of people would like to see what happened to some of the characters the show pampered so much and what influence the happenings had on the galaxy in the long run. DS9 had actually a lot of common with todays era of television, but it seems to be the least recognized one.
I mean, Quark gets a name drop in Picard.
But, this sounds like a "Where are they now?" type of segment in Star Trek.
I think whatever story they come up with will be dissatisfying no matter what.I don't think that's a bad use of the Short Treks format, TBH.
I mean, you should be able to come up with even an interesting 10-minute short about what Neelix or Harry Kim are up to now.
But, why does it need it? It receives the accolades now and it has top tier recognition. What more bones does it need?![]()
Given the anger and pushback against Picard not having a "happily ever after" I strong suspect that the fan's imaginations are sufficient on this point, and revisiting it will be disappointing.I think that some fans want to revisit the characters and setting; the finale left the door open for a lot of stories in the aftermath of the events in the series. PIC was a mostly successful revisitation of Picard, and I think people whose hearts lie with DS9 can easily imagine something similar in that part of the franchise.
"The star of Star Trek Prodigy, Kate Mulgrew, as Captain Kathryn Janeway"I don't think she's the lead, unless she's one of the teens, and I don't think that's what Mulgrew implied with her interview. She seems to be a secondary character. I can't find any source (other than this thread) that states that Mulgrew is going to be the lead actress on Prodigy.
Given the anger and pushback against Picard not having a "happily ever after" I strong suspect that the fan's imaginations are sufficient on this point, and revisiting it will be disappointing.
I have to admit, I chuckled at the image but it does make sense in a way. I could see Bashir recruiting others like himself to promote a more positive effort in S31's mission.But I think some of their choices (like Bashir as the literal head of Section 31) would make everyone's heads explode.
sisko is playing baseball with the prophets, kira and garak would be a good alternative!Great news!
Kurtzman has brought back Picard and Janeway. Now do something with the Sisko!
If Tuvix isn’t in the show, I will boycott and throw diseased meat at CBS headquarters.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.