And that's why Picard doesn't stand out to me as being contemporary. The colors feel reflective of more muted outfits that reflect a time after a war. In essence, it reflects the gray uniforms of Starfleet and the Dominion War. While some have left it behind (Starfleet trying to with the more colorful uniforms) Picard has not, and Raffi has not, and Freecloud is not a part of the Federation and reflects that more frontier feel.
Neither do you yet here you are
I started the thread. Talk about anything in regards to production. The next thing that I thought could use improvement were the doo point special effects. I mean really copy and past starships. Cheap and the ship they designed to be copied looked ugly.
Here is the thing and something that keeps coming up. New Trek is held to a different standard than old Trek. I'm slowly coming to recognize this idea, even if I don't agree with it. I could list example and example after example of Trek doing exactly what Picard has done. But, at this point in time, after several threads and pages, it simply is going to not line up, no matter what.You probably shouldn't start threads if you don't like people calling you out on your nonsense.
The ships were literally on screen for less than 30 seconds. They were fine. How is this any different than previous treks reusing footage ad nauseum
You probably shouldn't start threads if you don't like people calling you out on your nonsense.
The ships were literally on screen for less than 30 seconds. They were fine. How is this any different than previous treks reusing footage ad nauseum
And it's the SAME POSTERS.........now they also hold B&B up to Jesus like status.Typical TrekBBS Post in 2003:
"B&B don't know what they're doing and have no respect for Star Trek! ENT is a prequel that completely undermines TOS! And then there's the movies! Nemesis was nothing but pew-pew! Good riddance to bad rubbish! Cancel ENT!"
Typical TrekBBS Post in 2020:
"Alex Kurtzman doesn't know what he's doing and has no respect for Star Trek! STD is a prequel that completely undermines TOS! And then there's the movies! They were nothing but pew-pew and lens flare! Good riddance to bad rubbish! Cancel STD and STP!"
All I did was change the names and add lens flare.
Typical TrekBBS Post in 2003:
"B&B don't know what they're doing and have no respect for Star Trek! ENT is a prequel that completely undermines TOS! And then there's the movies! Nemesis was nothing but pew-pew! Good riddance to bad rubbish! Cancel ENT!"
Typical TrekBBS Post in 2020:
"Alex Kurtzman doesn't know what he's doing and has no respect for Star Trek! STD is a prequel that completely undermines TOS! And then there's the movies! They were nothing but pew-pew and lens flare! Good riddance to bad rubbish! Cancel STD and STP!"
All I did was change the names and add lens flare.
I started the thread. Talk about anything in regards to production. The next thing that I thought could use improvement were the doo point special effects. I mean really copy and past starships. Cheap and the ship they designed to be copied looked ugly.
Your thread title is misleading. It should be “Production qualities of Picard that you hate.” Because not only have you not said anything positive about PIC’s production quality, you’re going out of your way to just pick and choose random insignificant crap to bitch about, as if the entire purpose of this thread you created was to push your agenda of hating the show. So if you want us to take you seriously, try pointing out things about PIC’s production quality that you actually like so it doesn’t look like you have an ulterior motive for this topic.
I’m not required to say anything positive about the show. If you think it looks great go ahead and explain why you like the look such as the clothes and the effects.
We have.I’m not required to say anything positive about the show. If you think it looks great go ahead and explain why you like the look such as the clothes and the effects.
It is the constant need to have that rationalization explained rather than accept limitations of production, i.e. time, money, model availability, etc, that is rather odd. Some how there is still a thread about "James R. Kirk."Oh my word, that video sums up for me so much that's wrong with Star Trek fans.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.