• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Why no women captains?

Uhura was the first one to clue into the Son of God wasn't a Sun God in "Bread and Circuses."

Jason
And technically Number One was right on the money pretty much all the time. Although I'm with Pike; she's different.
 
Kirk and Spock were always right ergo everyone else was always wrong. Kirk and Spock were not women ergo, the women were always wrong. A logical deduction.

Well most of the time. They were the heroes after all.

Jason
 
Demands evidence, not assumption.
Actually it might be a challenging thread to examine all the times someone other than Kirk, Spock, McCoy, and Scotty was right in an episode. And hailing frequencies are open, Captain, doesn't count :-D
 
Kirk and Spock were always right ergo everyone else was always wrong. Kirk and Spock were not women ergo, the women were always wrong. A logical deduction.
Kirk was a woman, for half the episode, the onus of this thread.

Which means everything woman kirk came to say was suddenly wrong, and everything crazy woman Janice said became a righteous truth the exact moment she took possession of Kirk's balls.
 
In The Enemy Within Kirk is both right and wrong depending on which Kirk we are talking about. Nobody was more wrong though than poor Chekov. He thought everything was invented in Russia.

Jason
 
Kirk was a woman, for half the episode, the onus of this thread.

Which means everything woman kirk came to say was suddenly wrong, and everything crazy woman Janice said became a righteous truth the exact moment she took possession of Kirk's balls.
Ha ha. True! I think there was a missed opportunity for Chapel to do something worthwhile. I would have preferred to see Kirk win her over to his cause rather than dupe her back to docility.

I think there was often a trope in TOS that power was at odds with femininity. Pretty much all the female commanders had their femininity used against them. Nancy Headford had to put love on hold for her career. Even Dr Denhner's air of authority was cited as an indication that she was frigid. Number One had to eschew emotion in order to command. I do think it was almost accepted among the writers that 'normal' women were bad leaders.
 
Last edited:
Try to imagine if a psycho ex-girlfriend of yours yells at you (with crazy eyes) something like "YOUR WORLD OF BUS DRIVERS DOESN'T ADMIT WOMEN!!!!". Would you really try to argue with her by saying something like "No, look you're wrong, a good percentage of bus drivers are female and it is a quite inclusive job wich ..." or rather you would answer "Err, yes yes, you're right, it's exactly like you say, ok? Please?"
Agreed. If there's one thing that being a member here on the TrekBBS has taught me, it's that it's just not worth the effort disagreeing with some people.
 
His personality was agitated by women hormones... And lower back pain from carting jumblies around?

In Enemy Within, both the thug and the milksop were equally the same person from askew views, brought on by different body chemistry.
 
His personality was agitated by women hormones... And lower back pain from carting jumblies around?

In Enemy Within, both the thug and the milksop were equally the same person from askew views, brought on by different body chemistry.
I think Kirk's altered personality in TEW was due to epigenetic changes, switching genes on and off in addition to hormones. It does beg the question though, our personalities are determined by our genes and our experiences. What happens if you change one? Mental illness often has genetic and chemical causes if you're in a body that no longer has either, would you actually be insane any more?
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top