• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers The supporting cast

You're equating the Character's Flaws (Raffi) with the Actors Performance (Ms Hurd) and then apparently attempting to say the latter is is poor due to the former.

When in actuality what your post indicates is that you have been convinced that Raffi does indeed have said flaws, due to your insistence that a 24th Century Star Fleet Officer wouldn't behave that way.

No. The character being written in a bad/shitty way is one thing, actresses' performance is another. An opposite example would be the character played by Pill, Dr Jurati. While I find her character annoying, her acting skills are not that bad, although I wouldn't call them great either. Her acting borders on melodramatic as well, which seems to be the overall approach in this series, but her acting at least doesn't seem so contrived, insincere and unconvincing, except maybe in those silly comic relief scenes.
 
Where has it ever been stated that alcoholism has been eliminated as a social problem by the 24th century?

In the 24th century alcohol(ism) is a thing of the past. That has been established in the TNG episode The Neutral Zone.
 
Indeed. It is strange to think addiction has been eliminated. It's been a part of human history for many thousands of years.

It has been, believe it or not. Wars, poverty, diseases had also been part of the human history for thousands of years, yet they are all gone by the 24th century of Trek.
 
It has been, believe it or not. Wars, poverty, diseases had also been part of the human history for thousands of years, yet they are all gone by the 24th century of Trek.
Which is why there is constant conflict?

I reread the transcript of The Neutral Zone and addiction doesn't appeared to be eliminated.

There are still diseases that impact humans (Brothers) still war, still struggle in the colonies.

Earth might be different. But, it's not gone.
 
One of my fears about the series long before we actually saw anything was that Picard was going to be stuck with a bunch of cliched, rag-tag, space misfits. Luckily, in my opinion, it didn't turn out to be the case....until we met Rios.

The character's whole introduction was exactly what I feared. We see him smoking a cigar with a piece of shrapnel sticking out of his arm. Ok, he's going to be the stereotypical badboy who's been in lots of trouble before. He's exactly the kind of character I'd expect to see in the Mos Eisley Cantina or someone that Quill would be at odds with in Guardians of the Galaxy.
Except that Rios very clearly isn't a stereotypical badboy, if you pay attention to the character. Even in that introductory scene, he doesn't come across as a wannabe badass so much as a tired, apathetic guy who lives very much in the rough and tumble and has a very fatalistic view of life. Since then we've seen that he has a sense of humour buried beneath all that existential broodiness. We've learned that he harbours a lot of trauma and bitterness about what happened to end his Starfleet career. We've seen that despite being frustrated about all the extraneous people on his ship (he only signed up for one passenger, remember) he is very patient about having his space invaded. We've seen that he remains calm and level-headed in a crisis. We've seen that he is ever so slightly star-struck by Picard and is excited to be part of his mission, although he doesn't want to admit it. We've seen that he is quiet and introverted most of the time, but will lighten up and swap gossip with a good friend. We've seen him go along with a dangerous undercover mission requiring an absurd costume, without complaint - and we've seen how professionally he handled that mission, remaining 100% focused and alert, saving Picard's life from an attack he wouldn't have seen coming, and talking Seven down when Picard couldn't.

None of that characterisation comes anywhere close to 'stereotypical badboy' to me. The only 'bad' thing about him we've really seen so far is the cigar! As Picard observed in their first meeting, he is still Starfleet at heart, even if he doesn't want to admit it.
 
Yep, no wars or diseases on Star Trek, no sir...

What part of the human history is not clear?

Did you infer that from Sonny asking where the bar on the ship was and Riker answering there was none? Despite Ten Forward being right there, available to everyone including guests?

Sonny is clearly surprised that they don't drink, and the crew is surprised, shocked actually, at the organic damage from alcohol after he's treated aboard the Enterprise. Based on what did you infer people of the 24th century are still boozers (like Sonny) and addicts?

Which is why there is constant conflict?

On Earth as well?

I reread the transcript of The Neutral Zone and addiction doesn't appeared to be eliminated.

I'm glad you reread it. But haven't you watched TNG at all? I suppose you're not familiar with the episode Symbiosis.

There are still diseases that impact humans (Brothers) still war, still struggle in the colonies.

There is no alcoholism, no drug addictions, that's the point.

You're obviously watching a completely different show.

You'd really like to convince me I see 5 lights, huh? What a piece work you are...
 
It has been, believe it or not. Wars, poverty, diseases had also been part of the human history for thousands of years, yet they are all gone by the 24th century of Trek.

No they haven't, not in the slightest. We've watched several wars unfold in the 24th century, we've seen diseases as being the driver of many episodes, we've seen people starving on colonies.

Now, I have a copy of the TNZ transcript ope on another page. Could you direct me to the section where it states alcoholism is no longer a problem in the 24th century? Closest I've found yet is this exchange:

DATA: Talk.
SONNY: I'd like me a thick Kansas City steak, and some country fried potatoes, and a mess of greens. Oh, hell, just forget all that and give me have a martini, straight up, with two olives. For the vitamins.
(The glass appears out of thin air. Sonny samples it and whistles)
DATA: Is there something wrong?
SONNY: Wrong? Only that your computer here fixed about the best martini I have ever had. I just might get to like this place. Let's see if the Braves are on. How do you turn on this teevee?
RIKER: TV?
SONNY: Yeah, the boob tube. I'd like to see how the Braves are doing after all this time. Probably still finding ways to lose.
DATA: I believe he means television, sir. That particular form of entertainment did not last much beyond the year two thousand forty.
SONNY: Well, what do you guys do? I mean, you don't drink, and you ain't got no TV. Must be kind of boring, ain't it?
PICARD [OC]: Number One.

which does nothing beyond establishing that duty personnel on a starship don't drink as far as Sonny knows, despite the replicator making a good martini. We know, however, they do drink on duty. Because we have seen them do so on several occasions. The words alcoholism, alcoholic plain old alcohol aren't mentioned anywhere in the episode, as are several other keywords I searched for to be sure after skim reading it.

No. The character being written in a bad/shitty way is one thing, actresses' performance is another.....miss a bit.... Her acting borders on melodramatic as well, which seems to be the overall approach in this series, but her acting at least doesn't seem so contrived, insincere and unconvincing, except maybe in those silly comic relief scenes.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

EDIT

Ok, checked the transcript for Symbiosis too.

It explicitly confirms that drug addiction does indeed exist in the 24th century, as evidenced in this exchange:

WESLEY: Data, I can understand how this could happen to the Ornarans. What I can't understand is why anyone would voluntarily become dependent on a chemical.
DATA: Voluntary addiction to drugs is a recurrent theme in many cultures.
TASHA: Wesley, no one wants to become dependent. That happens later.
WESLEY: But it does happen. So why do people start?
TASHA: On my home planet, there was so much poverty and violence, that for some the only escape was through drugs.
WESLEY: How can a chemical substance can provide an escape.
TASHA: It doesn't, but it makes you think it does. You have to understand, drugs can make you feel good. They make you feel on top of the world. You're happy, sure of yourself, in control.
WESLEY: But it's artificial.
TASHA: It doesn't feel artificial until the drug wears off. Then you pay the price. Before you know it, you're taking the drug not to feel good, but to keep from feeling bad.
WESLEY: And that's the trap?
TASHA: All you care about is getting your next dosage. Nothing else matters.
WESLEY: I guess I just don't understand.
TASHA: Wesley, I hope you never do.
 
Last edited:
Sonny is clearly surprised that they don't drink, and the crew is surprised, shocked actually, at the organic damage from alcohol after he's treated aboard the Enterprise.
So, Riker tells him there's no bar despite there being one, he concludes that "they don't drink", and we are to take it as an objective fact regarding 24th century society? They were shocked that something that is considered minor, easily treatable organ damage (per Crusher) was actually able to progress to a lethal state in the 21st century.

I'm glad you reread it. But haven't you watched TNG at all? I suppose you're not familiar with the episode Symbiosis.
Tasha herself says right in that episode how she grew up in an environment filled with gang warfare and drug addicts. Nowhere in that episode were it stated that addiction itself is unknown to humans. Earth might not have a rampant drug problem in the 24th century but that doesn't mean that people like Raffi couldn't obtain their choice of poison if they wanted to.

No one has ever said in this the Neutral Zone or Symbiosis that alcoholism or drug addiction was en bloc eliminated throughout the entirety of human society in the 24th century, and just because we haven't seen alcoholics on TNG it doesn't mean they don't exist. We haven't seen my home city Budapest or the country of Hungary on The Next Generation, therefore I conclude Hungary doesn't exist in 2364. Seems perfectly reasonable.
 
Despite Ten Forward being right there, available to everyone including guests?
Not until next season!

What part of the human history is not clear?
What you said was this...
Wars, poverty, diseases had also been part of the human history for thousands of years, yet they are all gone by the 24th century of Trek.
I won't touch the poverty thing with a 10-meter duranium pole; and I'll buy the conceit that they've eliminated terrestrial wars and terrestrial diseases...but as we've seen and heard of many, many times, they've just upgraded to space wars and space diseases.

What a piece work you are...
Mod hat on: Careful there.
 
I think we're talking past each other on this point.

Indeed.

The fact that narcotics, their dangers, abuses and societal effects have been a recurring theme throughout Star Trek (including within the Federation) is hardly news. Our friend seems to have missed those bits.

So in the series we've seen Ornarans addicted to felicium, unnamed drugs being commonplace on Yar's homeworld, Vulcans addicted to trellium D, the Jem Hadar addicted to ketracel white, starfleet officers addicted to stimulants during wartime (DS9: Valiant), we've seen several crew members as heavy drinkers, we've seen crew afected by passive ingestion of drugs (not the least Spock) and we've seen various drug analogies including hypnosis, mind controlling computer games, mind controlling aliens, mind controlling humans, yadda yadda.

Pretty sure I've missed more than a few.
 
Indeed.

The fact that narcotics, their dangers, abuses and societal effects have been a recurring theme throughout Star Trek (including within the Federation) is hardly news. Our friend seems to have missed those bits.

So in the series we've seen Ornarans addicted to felicium, unnamed drugs being commonplace on Yar's homeworld, Vulcans addicted to trellium D, the Jem Hadar addicted to ketracel white, starfleet officers addicted to stimulants during wartime (DS9: Valiant), we've seen several crew members as heavy drinkers, we've seen crew afected by passive ingestion of drugs (not the least Spock) and we've seen various drug analogies including hypnosis, mind controlling computer games, mind controlling aliens, mind controlling humans, yadda yadda.

Pretty sure I've missed more than a few.
But NEVER did ANYONE vape. Benzites excluded!
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top