• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

1960's and risqué clothes?

I cannot believe that 395 replies later we are still discussing womens rights in TOS. Yes it was sexist, yes women wore revealing clothes and impossibly short (and very impractical) minidress uniforms. No it never showed women in command.
But so what?
It is a product of its time and should not be judged by our modern sensibilities.
You either accept it as such and get on with your life or you decide it offends you and go watch something else.
Simple!

Are you new to Star Trek fandom?

This is pretty much all we do.

;)
 
C'mon, gimme a break here.
It's what we do, judge stuff from the past with modern sensibilities.
Sometimes the issues are hundreds of years in the past that we judge.:guffaw:

Yup.
Woe betide Normans, Persians, Barbary Slavers, Egyptians, Vikings, Wagadou, you name it.

Can I start by saying the Normans had really dodgy hair?
 
I don't think I did. It seems I almost always miss the beginning, when they have the title.
I watched part of Harry Mudd's women tonight.
I almost thought at the end it was going to have the barbarian miner find himself happy with the woman that didn't have on 1/2 pound of make up,
But even without the magic pill, suddenly her face has makeup.
She looked human but I guess she was supposed to be an alien.( If you are an alien, if you concentrate, you have on make up. )

I still, for a moment thought the barbarian miner was going to tell her he like her just fine 'without the makeup'.
Venus drug, possibly left off victory, love and fertility.

Barbarian miners. :lol: I just rewatched this episode. Eve was the only woman of character. The other two were total bimbos. Poor space miners were desparate. So was Kirk for the crystals. I think it's one of the better first season shows.
 
Early TOS had yet to flesh out a lot of the terminology and canon but it could be very raw and gritty. I like episodes like "Mudd's Women" because they feel so unrefined and world-building. It's recognizable Trek but still so early that you get thrown by the quickly abandoned terminology as well as characters who have yet to become the ones we know and love.
 
Hey! I had Norman ancestors - now I'm required to be offended!

;)
The movie "The War Lord" with Charleton Heston does an excellent job of showcasing medieval Norman haircuts.

I cannot believe that 395 replies later we are still discussing womens rights in TOS. Yes it was sexist, yes women wore revealing clothes and impossibly short (and very impractical) minidress uniforms. No it never showed women in command.
But so what?
It is a product of its time and should not be judged by our modern sensibilities.
You either accept it as such and get on with your life or you decide it offends you and go watch something else.
Simple!

I would say it's completely fair game to rationally analyze and critique it, in order to truly understand it and see what we can learn from it going forward. But it's counterproductive to make sweeping, knee-jerk negative judgments because something from the past was not in line with the way things are today, as many these days tend to do. As L.P. Hartley wrote, "The past is a foreign country; they do things differently there."

Kor
 
Yup.
Woe betide Normans, Persians, Barbary Slavers, Egyptians, Vikings, Wagadou, you name it.

Can I start by saying the Normans had really dodgy hair?
What about the Celts?
Hear-tell they ran into battle naked!
Being run at by a big, red haired, naked man! Yikes!
 
What about the Celts?
Hear-tell they ran into battle naked!
Being run at by a big, red haired, naked man! Yikes!

Don't ever remember hearing that about the Celts. What I read was that they'd all work themselves into a berserker frenzy before running out onto the battlefield so they wouldn't notice their mortal wounds until the enemy was all dead.

Now, the Greek Myrmidons, they were known for going into battle naked.
 
Don't ever remember hearing that about the Celts. What I read was that they'd all work themselves into a berserker frenzy before running out onto the battlefield so they wouldn't notice their mortal wounds until the enemy was all dead.
Wasn't that the Norse?
 
Blue naked red haired men? Double yikes
To go back to the objectification, these were reports from Roman witnesses. They tended to portray the Celts as savages little better than animals that Rome needed to bring civilization to. How extensive the woad covering was, why they did it, and how naked they really were are open questions since we have no Celtic opinions on topic.
 
picts.jpg

d7e23281ad22b420761df4cca74ee21f.jpg
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top