• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Star Trek: Picard 1x04 - "Absolute Candor"

Rate the episode...


  • Total voters
    283
I'm starting to wonder if Rios himself is real or if it's just a whole ship of holograms.

A fistful of holograms... sounds like deja vu.;)


Maybe the whole ship is just a hologram... Someone managed to extend the power of the mobile emitter.:biggrin:

Imagine the scene: Picard finds a thing on one of the bullheads that kinda looks like a mobile emitter. "Don't touch that!!".. Too late he touches it and the whole ship disappears around him and he's left with the mobile emitter in the palm of his hand.:lol:
 
Maybe the "captain" whose brains he saw splattered all along the bulkhead was the real Rios!

His existential horror is he knows the "real him" is dead - and he can't join Starfleet because he's not a living being.

Interesting. I hadn't thought of that. But his being away from any type of holo-emitter when he goes down onto a planet next week would undercut that. Unless the emitter is concealed. But I'm leaning towards no.
 
Maybe the "captain" whose brains he saw splattered all along the bulkhead was the real Rios!

His existential horror is he knows the "real him" is dead - and he can't join Starfleet because he's not a living being.

See, I like this idea, and it gives all the holograms a purpose to integrate for S2. Adds to the mystery of what mission his ship was on when he went ppfftt.
 
Could be. It’s an interesting theory. But at this point, you have a quest towards saving a synth/android, a Romulan who has issues with Picard, a human who has issues with Picard, a human who may or may not (probably) is spying on all of this and a guilty hologram as Captain of the whole thing?

That’s a lot of fucking angst and trickery on that ship.
 
Could be. It’s an interesting theory. But at this point, you have a quest towards saving a synth/android, a Romulan who has issues with Picard, a human who has issues with Picard, a human who may or may not (probably) is spying on all of this and a guilty hologram as Captain of the whole thing?

That’s a lot of fucking angst and trickery on that ship.

Not to mention that there are only six episodes left to solve all this!!
 
Not to mention that there are only six episodes left to solve all this!!

This whole thing's not getting resolved in six episodes. They'll hit a stopping point at the 10th episode. Leave some for next year, then continue on.

Discovery wraps everything up by the end of the season. Picard doesn't look like the type of series where it will.
 
I'm more concerned that his choice would be so anachronistic as to require a whole other book full of cliffnotes explaining the historical context of all of the *really* misogynistic parts of 'The Three Musketeers', less the lad get a very skewed and outdated view of human culture.
I suspect the choice of book was just a little in-joke, a nod to Santiago Cabrera, who played Aramis in BBC's The Musketeers for three years.
I'm starting to wonder if Rios himself is real or if it's just a whole ship of holograms.
I assumed the 'shrapnel in shoulder' scene when he was first introduced was intended to demonstrate that this one is flesh and blood, contrasted with the holograms all around him.
 
This whole thing's not getting resolved in six episodes. They'll hit a stopping point at the 10th episode. Leave some for next year, then continue on.

Discovery wraps everything up by the end of the season. Picard doesn't look like the type of series where it will.

I think if Rios is a holo that reveal might be the season one cliffhanger.
 
I suspect the choice of book was just a little in-joke, a nod to Santiago Cabrera, who played Aramis in BBC's The Musketeers for three years.

I assumed the 'shrapnel in shoulder' scene when he was first introduced was intended to demonstrate that this one is flesh and blood, contrasted with the holograms all around him.
The book is 400 years old. I doubt he'd take it as a blueprint for modern human life and culture anymore than someone introduced to James I Malleaus Malificarum would think that's how Wiccans need to be handled.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top