Big-budget screenwriters are subject to all sorts of wild/bad whims from studio execs. What appears on screen is hardly necessarily representative of what they might have wanted or originally written.I wonder why Kinberg was brought on to the FC movies in the first place, when X3 had been a dud.
Sure there was - there was a big-ass confrontation with full-on supervillain Magneto commanding an entire island/asteroid full of mutants, as promised at the end of DoFP, as distinguished from a hastily convened crowd of campers in a forest as seen in X3. Also, there's Space. (And Matthew Vaughn gave us Kingsman: The Golden Circle, so I'd hardly call him an authority on making quality action sequels.)Matthew Vaughn was right. There was no place for the FC cast to go after DOFP.
I wonder why Kinberg was brought on to the FC movies in the first place, when X3 had been a dud.
Kor
I'd grant you do that if Kinsberg had only one bad film to his name, but the fact that he has multiple bad ones to his name, including repeating the exact same mistakes more than a decade later...yeah, it's him.Big-budget screenwriters are subject to all sorts of wild/bad whims from studio execs. What appears on screen is hardly necessarily representative of what they might have wanted or originally written.
Jean dies in the 90s but died in X3 in the 2000s.
Jean is giving a speech at the start of X1 to congress about the emergence of mutants. But Apocalypse and Dark Phoenix has them out in public. Like it's no big deal.
Styker was exposed and arrested by Moira McTaggert at the end of Apocalypse. I very seriously doubt Stryker will be able to be meeting with the president in the 2000s and kick off the events of X2.
There are other incongruities, but you get the idea.
It should be noted that Jean dies in 1992 in the revised timeline but is also supposed to be alive and well in 2024. Sooner than that, when Logan joins the team in the early 2000s. For the New York Mission. Something referenced ito still have occurred in the Logan film set in 2029.I'm getting the idea you don't understand that things are not supposed to necessarily line up with the original movies due to the timeline change. These are not incongruities.
It should be noted that Jean dies in 1992 in the revised timeline but is also supposed to be alive and well in 2024. Sooner than that, when Logan joins the team in the early 2000s. For the New York Mission. Something referenced ito still have occurred in the Logan film set in 2029.
The FC writing, production crew just stopped paying attention to details and decided to make up the story as they went along. Ignoring the continuity they themselves had previously established.
Technically, she didn't die in 1992. She evolved. But to me, there's a strong implication that she is never coming back to the normal plane of existence to live among mere mortal mutants again.
Kor
It could be argued that you are projecting a self-manufactured solution to the problems inherent in the film. We will never know if Jean comes back to life and live at the Xavier Mansion in 2024. Because the writer/director/producer (Simon Kinberg) decided to end would he knew would be be the last movie in the series with loose ends, and incongruities.Jean being alive as of 2023 in the revised timeline in no way, shape, or form precludes her dying in 1992, but it does mean that, at some point in the two decades that pass between those dates, she is resurrected.
I really wish people would stop projecting manufactured problems onto these movies.
I was really shocked to look at Amazon and see that it has 4 1/2 out 5 stars with 23,000+ reviews. I can't wrap my mind around that many people liking it that much.
Really disappointing that they botched this storyline twice.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.