I always enjoyed VOYAGER, even though it ranks lower to me among the first 5 series... 6, counting The Animated Series.
The show had a number of flaws, but one of the things I always respected and loved about VOYAGER was the number of really high concept ideas that were used... a living nebula ("THE CLOUD"), a living twisting phenomenon ("TWISTED"), a species that ages in reverse ("INNOCENCE"), a giant virus ("MACROCOSM"), living your life backwards ("BEFORE AND AFTER"), using time itself as a weapon ("YEAR OF HELL"), a black market of violent thoughts ("RANDOM THOUGHTS"), a body swapper ("VIS A VIS"), an ocean in space ("THIRTY DAYS"), Chaotic Space ("THE FIGHT"), an episode where we, the audience, are the only ones who get to know a ship of doppelgangers ("COURSE: OBLIVION"), a sentient bomb ("WARHEAD"), a planet we see evolve for centuries in just hours ("BLINK OF AN EYE"), a monument that makes people relive a massacre ("MEMORIAL"), a species that procreates by altering the dead of others ("ASHES TO ASHES"), a unique way to do a clip show ("SHATTERED").
While some of these episodes were poorly executed, I give them credit for trying them out. It did make the Delta Quadrant feel like a strange place... and as past Janeway put it, a death trap.
"Course: Oblivion" really surprised me. It's one of the few times I was surprised by what was going on. I love the episode, and hate that they were destroyed, but think of it. They would have to be. Imagine them getting back to Earth.
I don't understand the hate for "Threshold". It amazed me the first time I watched it, it still does on re-watches. It's great science fiction.
I have a problem with "Voyager was too gimmiky and over did ideas that were already stretched" though. First, ALL the series used and sometimes overused these crutches. The Borg was a different thing though, since they were traveling in the Borg space. I think there was just enough Borg on Voyager. Second, people hate the "out there" episodes. They complain when the episodes are re-hashed versions of the same thing, and hate when the episodes are too foreign.
Seven has a replicator in her stomach that recycles waste into usable electricity.
hmmm... And the same thing happens in every TOS time travel episode, any TNG episode where they go to the past, and any DS9 episode where they go to the past. The crew always remember their experiences. In Future's End, this makes perfect sense. Voyager went back to the past and stopped the inventor guy from going to the future. Voyager has to remember their experiences. While the Braxton at the end never experienced the inventor guy going to the future and destroying it...because Voyager stopped him. He is traveling back to put Voyager back in the delta quadrant. He is leaving from the same point in his own time, that the Braxton at the beginning did. He never experienced the events that the earlier Braxton did.at the end of future's end, Braxton never experienced the timeline but Janeway and the others remember him experience it. So which is it? and Then when we see him later he did experience it... So they can't even be coherent with themselves!! And absolutely everything Voyager does about time travel is just like that.
lol, even her sweat smells like proverbial roses, so I am told.Isn't she just perfect. That makes her even more sexy!![]()
lol, even her sweat smells like proverbial roses, so I am told.
The problem with the way Voyager treated time travel is that it's an anything goes bullshit. at the end of future's end, Braxton never experienced the timeline but Janeway and the others remember him experience it. So which is it? and Then when we see him later he did experience it... So they can't even be coherent with themselves!! And absolutely everything Voyager does about time travel is just like that. They don't even try to make it look like they care.
Janeway learns to type on a keyboard quite fast in a matter of seconds, as a matter of fact so does Scotty. I mean these are not people, they are androids.
hmmm... And the same thing happens in every TOS time travel episode, any TNG episode where they go to the past, and any DS9 episode where they go to the past. The crew always remember their experiences. In Future's End, this makes perfect sense. Voyager went back to the past and stopped the inventor guy from going to the future. Voyager has to remember their experiences. While the Braxton at the end never experienced the inventor guy going to the future and destroying it...because Voyager stopped him. He is traveling back to put Voyager back in the delta quadrant. He is leaving from the same point in his own time, that the Braxton at the beginning did. He never experienced the events that the earlier Braxton did.
If you want something to complain about, it should be the return of Braxton in season 5, but that is more of a "fun" episode, and doesn't take itself as seriously.
I've said this many times here. The other shows (TOS, TNG, DS9, and ENT) did time travel stories just as much as Voyager; Averaging about one or two per season. Any complaints about Voyager's time travel travel mechanics can be applied just as easily to the other series.
Again when I say that Archer is a bungling fool, I don't see you or any other tell me that's because I have a prejudice against strong male leads.
What's good for the goose is also good for the gander.
Yes, I didn't hear many protests when in one episode we saw Archer and Trip play some outdoor game, all sweaty and barechested. Had they done a similar thing with women all hell would have gotten loose!!!
I've just recently started to actually enjoy Voyager -- within the last few months -- and for exactly the reason I previously disliked it. I always hated how this show refused to engage with the darkness of it's premise. But lately, as the actual world gets darker, and as I spend more and more of my own time directly engaging with said darkness, I find more value in a show about people in a terrible, seemingly hopeless situation, but who insistently stay positive and upbeat, to a degree that's almost delusional.
Well, of course you didn't, because the protests of sexualization of women on Star Trek are not about protesting sexualization, they're about protesting inequality. I've always said there's one respect in which Enterprise is clearly the best of all Trek shows: its the only series to get objectification right. For once, they objectified the men nearly as much as the women, and thus it all becomes unobjectionable. Archer/Trip getting sweaty and barechested wasn't a new problem -- it was the fix of the existing problem.
If Voyager had also picked up a hot young male character who spent years in a crotch-hugging bodysuit, there wouldn't still be complaints about Seven's catsuit today.
(I mean, I'm sure there would have been some complaints, in that Trek fandom is huge and diverse, and at any given moment you can find someone willing to complain about literally any aspect of it. But they would have been more fringe, bullshit complaints, because with a hot guy costumed to a similarly sexualized degree, Voyager would have been walking the walk and not just talking the talk)
"ASHES TO ASHES" - honestly, my issue was that the guest actress completely outshined Garrett Wang. Which is not a bad thing, nor difficult to do. But I would have made Ballard have more of a friendship with other stronger actors... I think it would have made even better scenes. Also, she should have been someone we have seen or at least heard of before. It would have had more impact to the audience, I think.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.