• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Star Trek: Discovery 2x12 - "Through the Valley of Shadows"

Hit it!


  • Total voters
    241
Is Star Trek fandom ready for complex environmental systems?

Nope. The fantasy approach of mono-climate mono-environmental planets is just dandy with fandom. And it fits with fandom's preferred 'planet of hats' approach to alien civilizations too! Why fix what isn't broken? After all, Aliens and Alien worlds in Star Trek are supposed to be allegories and metaphors!
 
Nope. The fantasy approach of mono-climate mono-environmental planets is just dandy with fandom. And it fits with fandoms preferred 'planet of hats' preferred approach to alien civilizations too! Why fix what isn't broken?
I just laughed at the possibility that there wasn't actually anything weird about the Genesis Planet's climate and Saavik only found it weird because of how used all of Starfleet was to every planet being defined by its one single biome. "It's not a desert planet, not a jungle planet and not a swamp planet either! It has everything, it's impossible!!!"
 
Nope. The fantasy approach of mono-climate mono-environmental planets is just dandy with fandom.
Not with me. That's one of the reasons I've long thought Trek shouldn't have introduced a new species and a new world every week--it should have gone deeper on the core species and fleshed them out, while hinting there were others. If you go too wide, you end up being incredibly shallow.

It's one of the reasons I like the Rihannsu novel series so much, because it's a deep dive into a race that's only shallowly covered in televised Trek: the Romulans (and their homeworlds.)
 
Last edited:
I just laughed at the possibility that there wasn't actually anything weird about the Genesis Planet's climate and Saavik only found it weird because of how used all of Starfleet was to every planet being defined by its one single biome. "It's not a desert planet, not a jungle planet and not a swamp planet either! It has everything, it's impossible!!!"

As far as I can tell bad science in Star Trek only seems to really matter if its costs $6 a month or so to stream.
 
As far as I can tell bad science in Star Trek only seems to really matter if its costs $6 a month or so to stream.
I just can't help but love this "the customer is always right" mindset... I've paid a minuscule amount of money for this product, therefore its creator absolutely must cater to my every whim about it. How delusional can people get, really? If $6 per month was enough to make the show completely to my liking, it would be called The Tilly Show and I don't think it would be too popular.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top