Yeah, their comments seem to be the usual hyperbolic statements you get when a show’s cast and crew talk to the press.Well...drama is kind of what they do, so...![]()
Yeah, their comments seem to be the usual hyperbolic statements you get when a show’s cast and crew talk to the press.Well...drama is kind of what they do, so...![]()
It was never 26 all in a row (and most Network shows were getting between 22 - 24 eps. a season on the 'Big 3' plus FOX).
It was usually 10 new eps. then 4 repeats, then 6 new eps.; then 4 more repeats, etc.
And they're sourcing the same article mentioned in the first post.The bot has just told us that there's a surprise ending to S2.
https://www.trekbbs.com/threads/discovery-–-unexpected-ending-will-change-everything.298965/
Ah, thanks.And they're sourcing the same article mentioned in the first post.
Well that scares the shit out of me.
![]()
Exactly my thinking. All those statements have me extremely suspicious that they'll try to pull some weird stunt in order to appease the rather loud portion of fans who cry “not canon!” I would much rather see them (continue to) create their very own version of Trek instead of “aligning” it with fucking canon.![]()
... and Morticia Addams roses.I remember the hype before TATV, when they called it a valentine for the fans. It was a valentine of moldy chocolates.
The last couple episodes gave enterprise heavily in it so I’m sure pike and Spock with be back on it before anything drastic happens.
But the reset would be cool as it would mean the Klingon war would have happened but not because of Michael. Plus a ton of other minor and major things.
The Discovery is sent into the distant future, where Zora develops sentience and waits for the crew's return.
Premonitions? You mean like the Red Angel warning Spock that Michael was in danger when they were kids on Vulcan? Were there other such premonitions in the show?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.