The plan was to get Congress to repeal the Alien Amnesty Act. They talked about the "drive" to get it repealed and "support" for its repeal. They said (sorry, there's no speaker information in this transcript):
"Tell me Ben Lockwood cannot repeal a congressional act.
No, but he can try and sway the will of the people."
Then Ben Lockwood would be ripped on mercilessly for not understanding the rule of law. It actually wouldn't matter what the issue was--if he was trying to be a bureaucrat repealing an act of Congress, which is essentially the case as you are describing above, it would be a similar reaction to when Alexander Haig said he was in charge when Reagan got shot and Bush was in transit.
Even "swaying the will of the people," wouldn't have any effect unless it was so overwhelming that Congress had to act, which would require a lot more than a 50/50 split in the country. In a split like that, both sides would dig their heels in. Of course, if Congress did repeal the law, then so be it, as it is their purpose.
Agreed, but that is nearly impossible when a single-minded agenda drives stories. The biggest thing holding this immigration plot together is the strength of Sam Witwer's performances (with the exception of this recent episode, where he was more of a caricature), and how a few characters actually speak to the legitimate concerns of the human population.
That's the problem with a single-minded agenda stories. The writers will ignore reality to create a fiction that is either ignorant or as unrealistic as real aliens coming here under the circumstances in this show. You're right that Witwer has been solid this season.
Ah, while that makes sense, the showrunners needed a boogeyman/Trump surrogate for their immigration plot, so her VP had to be the complete opposite when she would never select a running mate standing in such opposition to her core beliefs and/or policies. Once she was ousted, the new president can do whatever he desires (as in the Andrew Johnson example), but in the selection of a running mate, there's no way the Marsdin character would have picked her polar opposite in Baker. But, there's that showrunner boogeyman business again....
Exactly. These writers were so hurt and disgusted that Trump won that they have badly hurt their show. Instead of trying to redo the 2016 election, they should probably work on telling good stories. This story is a thinly veiled attack on Trump, and they have to jump through unrealistic hoops to get it there. This story neither reflects actual events or any actual people--just their perception of them.
Haley, Lena and Alex have all expressed concerns that can stand in as the beliefs of the population. The showrunners will never fully explore that, as it poses too much of a sensible counter to the kind of soapboxing certain characters mount in every episode, which is an utterly unrealistic position to hold after their earth has suffered several alien attacks/invasions. Notice how most of the main characters never offer real solutions to the kinds of problems earth has faced.
While I don't feel this is a good storyline for Supergirl, imagine if they did it right, and instead of demonizing anyone who disagrees with the writers, they addressed the concerns and show that those who are worried about their safety. CW constantly talks about inclusion, but I am willing to bet there are no conservatives on the Supergirl writing staff that get a say and would be allowed to write the opposing view.
If Congress did repeal this Alien Amnesty Act, it would be completely within their right to do so, and the aliens would have to comply. Every nation has a right to choose who they welcome into it, and who they do not.