• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Season 3 Course Correction

I sadly have to agree with Serveaux here. There's a lot more pandering to the fandom in season 2. Sure, most of it has story reasons and this is the story they want to tell, buuut...there are thousands of possible stories and more ways to tell every one of them and they chose one that involved not only fan favourites like Spock and Pike but made damn sure to include No. 1, Talosisan, a more conservatice D7 design and hairy Klingons. Season 2 is reactionary in that way
IDK - Fans (myself included) like to read a lot into stuff, but that said: Season 1 had PLENTY of canon connections as well, so I don't see season 2 as any different in that regard. Yes, they did give the Klingons their hair back, showed an actual Klingon D7 'holograph plan'; but again, Season one had plenty of 'canon' connections to the 'Enterprise' series and still to a LOT of TOS.

Thus, I say there's been about the same level of 'pandering' in BOTH seasons; BUT, the pandering in Season 2 is a bit more to many fan's liking WRT what it shows and connects to. ;)

It would be stupid for any production not to read audience reviews and reactions; and if they find some comments valid, makes adjustments to better please that audience. But overall, they really haven't adjusted that much per se. They are just telling a different story; and they still do it in the sa,me manner they did with Season one. :)
 
Season 1 had PLENTY of canon connections as well
Of course it had. But that was done a lot smarter and way more subtle than in season 2. Sure, Mudd, Stella, the Sareks all were there, but in a way that didn't feel as on the nose as travelling to Talos IV with the The Cage crew
 
I actually feel like Season 2 has less fan pandering overall. I mean, in Season 1 we had little things like Lorca's tribble and the Gorn skeleton which were just there to make nerds go "I recognize this!" This season it seems like most of the little nuggets of fanwank are either somehow plot relevant or else put much more unobtrusively in the background.
 
I don't think any of the previous ST series would've survived past season 1 or 2 if they were being held to the same standards that DSC is. Just to recap some of those series and their first 2 seasons:
- TNG: over-the-top, wacky, much of the cast didn't think it would survive past season 1. It also included a being named Q who could traverse all of time and space at will.
- DS9: depressing, slow-moving, almost no follow-up story arcs, species of the week
- VOY: Kazon, Kazon, everywhere Kazon
- ENT: slow-moving, shallow character development, I honestly didn't make it past season 1​

Some really good ideas have been presented in this thread, and I offer this recap more for the people who've already written off DSC altogether. If you judged your favorite ST series solely based on its first season or two, how would it do?

All the previous Trek show had the benefit of still being the best ptoduced SF-series around. Yes, TNG season 1 was clunky as hell - but it was the only SF show with space-ships on the air! And thus the best one by default. By the time of ENT, there was some competition, like Firefly, Stargate and Farscape. But even then, ENT was the one with the biggest and most experienced production.

DIS simply has the problem that in the last few years so much good shit has happened on screen - we are endlessly spoiled and can compare it to a plethora of other, equally good and amitious SF. Seriously, you can't imagine how much the simply imagery of a re-used starship on screen was able to pull people to the screen, simply because it was so rare!
 
All the previous Trek show had the benefit of still being the best ptoduced SF-series around. Yes, TNG season 1 was clunky as hell - but it was the only SF show with space-ships on the air! And thus the best one by default. By the time of ENT, there was some competition, like Firefly, Stargate and Farscape. But even then, ENT was the one with the biggest and most experienced production.

DIS simply has the problem that in the last few years so much good shit has happened on screen - we are endlessly spoiled and can compare it to a plethora of other, equally good and amitious SF. Seriously, you can't imagine how much the simply imagery of a re-used starship on screen was able to pull people to the screen, simply because it was so rare!

Discovery still manages to be the most cinematic of any scifi show I can recall on a week in week out basis. The Expanse for instance is high quality tv, but it is still TV quality as are most of the others at varying level of discount fun, but comparatively discount looking nonetheless.
 
I actually feel like Season 2 has less fan pandering overall. I mean, in Season 1 we had little things like Lorca's tribble and the Gorn skeleton which were just there to make nerds go "I recognize this!" This season it seems like most of the little nuggets of fanwank are either somehow plot relevant or else put much more unobtrusively in the background.
Now you have Pike, Spock, Number One, the Enterprise, Talosians...
 
Now you have Pike, Spock, Number One, the Enterprise, Talosians...
Point of order:
- We first actually saw the Enterprise in Season 1 (Pike also was Hailing at the end of the Season).
- Pike was one of the Captain's name's displayed on a list of 'Most Decorated Starfleet Captains" called up by Saru in Season 1.
- Spock was referred to numerous times in Season 1.

So in the "new for Season Two" we only have (so far): Number One, Talos IV and Talosians. ;)
 
I'll also reply to your post piece-by-piece, but I'll try not to be critical of the ideas, and just offer suggestions or slight rebuttals:

I tend to find myself in the "not my Trek" camp when it comes to Discovery. Rather than beat a dead horse as to why (the character of Michael Burnham in general, disregard for continuity and the Prime Directive, and the forced melodrama to name a few), I'd like to visit an alternate universe where I've been named showrunner beginning with Season 3 and here are some of ways I'd like to "course correct" for the direction of the show.

Both The Next Generation and Deep Space Nine made shifts in aesthetic and story-telling that made those shows markedly different (better) in their third seasons. So, I’ve been named showrunner and the only directive I’ve been given is that I can’t get rid of Burnham. Here we go:

Regardless of how S2 ends, the show gets a little bit of a reset button. The end of the season results in Section 31 being publicly disavowed by Starfleet, which allows for them to become the unsanctioned organization we know. Georgiou and Tyler leave the show to be on their spin-off. They take Owosekun with them so her character can be fleshed out on a show that has room in the cast.

No problems here. Owo has an interesting background, so it might be fun to see her there. I prefer 31 to be a little more unsanctioned than they appear, and have even offered up ideas (including how to deal with Kirk as a main character) in other threads.

The final scene of S2 sees the Discovery arrive at Vulcan to pick up the captain they were supposed to pick up at the end of S1. The Enterprise is there as well so Pike, Spock, and Nhan can return to their ship. Doctor Culber, having gone through everything he has the past two seasons, ends his relationship with Stamets and takes a transfer to the Enterprise. Whatever conflict Burnham has with Spock extends to Sarek and Amanda. They don’t want to see her ever again.

I'm not sure about getting rid of Culber. He's been through a lot, so I'd rather have Stamets stay with him. Although I will admit that they may have laid some groundwork for this.

We meet the new captain of Discovery: an Andorian played by Jeffery Combs.

An Andorian: Cool.
Jeffrey Combs: Cool.
An Andorian played by Jeffrey Combs: We kinda saw that, already.

S3 picks up three months later. The ship has undergone a slight refit including the removal of the spore drive and an aesthetic shift to a more TOS looking design (the nacelles look more like TOS-era ones, the ship interior is redesigned and made brighter). The crew also adopt the uniforms used by the Enterprise crew. This will be the ONLY "‘member Star Trek?” we see from now on. No more Enterprise/Pike/Spock appearances

Why not? It might be good for future crossover potential. A break though would make sense.

no hitherto unheard of encounter with the Gorn, Tholians, Romulans, the Talosians, Harry Mudd, or other species that it’s explicitly stated first contact occurs with in TOS.

Tholians were a known entity in TOS, and encountered by Archer and the NX-01. Harry Mudd is a criminal who has had past run-ins with Discovery. Having him try to disable and steal the spore drive will be fun after they remove it and there's no trace. They could be the ones who finally put him (and his wife?) in prison.

Talosians should never appear again, agreed, and Gorn might be best saved for Section 31. But the Romulans are such a classic, that I wouldn't mind them being the enemies behind-the-scenes known to us, but not known to the crew. I've suggested as much before. Maybe they employ the Orions that you bring up later?

And certainly none from Berman-era Trek like the Ferengi, the Borg, Cardassians, etc.

Cardassians should be fine, especially if portrayed as a more peaceful, less militaristic race. An odd Ferengi here and there wouldn't be out of place.

From a story-telling standpoint, the biggest shift will be away from Burnham being the main character and to a more ensemble approach to the cast and an abandon of being a full drama and injecting some comedy into the series.

Well, you did just estrange her from her family and her boyfriend is gone again, but yeah, toss her in the background.

The new captain says the state of the engineering department is in disarray. He names Stamets chief engineer, but because he’s actually a scientist, Jet Reno is made his assistant due to her expertise.

I don't think Stamets should be on the show without a spore drive, and I don't know about making him Chief Engineer. Reno (currently) outranks him, so really this should be reversed if anything. He might work as a science officer, although that's Burnham's job.

The new chief medical officer is a Vulcan male who clashes with Burnham over her (perceived) appropriation of Vulcan culture. This, coupled with the conflict with Spock/Sarek causes her to re-evaluate how see acts, prompting her to be more human and a little less pretentious.

I don't think she's that pretentious, and that can go away easier with less of a focus on her. Conflict with the CMO is good, but I feel it is a bad idea to make him Vulcan. That runs the risk of going to the Enterprise well of making Vulcans into racist jerks.

Lieutenant Detmer becomes security chief. Tilly takes over as helmsman, continuing her quest toward the captain's chair.

As others have said, Detmer is a lifelong trained with no known security background. Maybe put Detmer on Ops (Owo's station) and put Tilly at the helm. Or, with the refit, make the front stations helm and navigation again, allowing Detmer and Tilly to share the role and make a mentor out of Detmer.

If Airiam is still around, have her take over ops, and move it to her station.

So our main characters are:
  • Andorian Captain
  • Saru
  • Burnham
  • Stamets
  • Tilly
  • Detmer
  • Vulcan Doctor
  • Jet Reno
Other characters who will be fleshed out throughout the season are: communications officer Bryce, tactical officer Rhys, Linus (the Saurian introduced this season), and a female command training program Ensign who will play as foil for Tilly.

The premiere will feature an attack on the Starbase where Discovery is undergoing refit. We learn that the attack is perpetrated by the Orion Syndicate and the goal is the theft of the spore drive itself. The Syndicate will serve as the season-long antagonists and will be played essentially as the mafia (in spaaaace!). Discovery will be tasked with tracking down the spore drive before they can figure out how it works or sell it to another power (e.g. the Klingons).

One small issue with this: The Animated Series promoted the idea that Orion piracy was a big secret, with the pirates killing themselves rather than being discovered. So, having known Orions attacking starbases is kinda breaking continuity, unless well-handled.

The season will advance with mostly standalone episodes focusing on exploration and science such as:
  • A follow-up episode with the Kelpien homeworld to see how that situation is playing out
  • An episode with a Tellarite ship to do some world-building
  • A follow-up episode with Pahvo from S1
  • A true first contact episode with a new species that has achieved warp drive
  • A visit to the Saurian homeworld in an effort to flesh out Linus' character and that species
Generally, the aim would be somewhere in-between an episodic approach (like TOS, TNG, VOY) and fully arc based (like Discovery has been and DS9 in Seasons 5-7) while world building new concepts introduced in Discovery like the Kelpiens, Pahvo, the spore drive and previously under-utilized species like the Saurians and Tellarites rather than treading over established things like Vulcan culture, Klingon politics, Talos IV and General Order 7, and Spock's family dynamic.

I'm not a fan of the Tellarite design, but they do have an appeal as a classic species that can be expanded on. A break from the Klingons might be good, or they can be encountered mostly in the Pike series.

If we're fanwanking here, I wouldn't mind a cliffhanger scene of L'Rell being finally deposed by General Rynar, a smoothhead dressed to the tee as a TOS Klingon, who marches his smoothhead troops into the room and vows revenge on the Federation. Played, of course, by Kenneth Mitchell.
 
Tilly is meant to be a theoretical engineer and one of the brightest in her class. That requires a completely different skillset than an ace pilot. So no, she can't just slot into a helmsman role because it would be more convenient.
 
Tilly is meant to be a theoretical engineer and one of the brightest in her class. That requires a completely different skillset than an ace pilot. So no, she can't just slot into a helmsman role because it would be more convenient.

S4GhdgJ.jpg
 
Tilly is meant to be a theoretical engineer and one of the brightest in her class. That requires a completely different skillset than an ace pilot. So no, she can't just slot into a helmsman role because it would be more convenient.

I would agree with you, generally, but Tilly is supposed to be training for command right now. So I would assume slotting her into a position she is not that familiar with would be a part of her training.

Even Deanna Troi learned how to fly a ship. Supposedly.
 
I honestly don't give a chit about how little or too much "pandering" the Producers FEEL They have to do.

I've been loving just about everything DISCOVERY has shown us since episode Four of Season 1, when I began to understand where They were going with the characters.

But ya know what beyond that, I'm a Star Trek Fan..., They SHOULD be Pandering to me!
:techman:


And what happened both times she flew a ship???

CRASH AND BURN!!!

:guffaw:
 
I sadly have to agree with Serveaux here. There's a lot more pandering to the fandom in season 2. Sure, most of it has story reasons and this is the story they want to tell, buuut...there are thousands of possible stories and more ways to tell every one of them and they chose one that involved not only fan favourites like Spock and Pike but made damn sure to include No. 1, Talosisans, a more conservative D7 design and hairy Klingons. Season 2 is reactionary in that way

Season 1 was already finished writing, and filming wrapped in early October 2017 less than a month after the first episode aired. That includes receiving a hail from Captain Pike and "it's the USS Enterprise" with Sarek and Michael looking at each other. S1 was already full of canon reference, and it was obvious especially since episode 6 that they intended to explore Spock's family dynamic.

Then there were these interviews at the premiere in September:

In this one, Klingon artists Hetrick and Page were asked if all the Klingons are bald and they respond "in this iteration, yes... for now."

In this one Kurtzman talks about "pushing the edges of canon" and how they couldn't fit it all into one season:

"There is a certain point when you are working through the story arc of a season that you start to have ideas you fall in love with that you realize cannot go into that season. So, you start putting them on index cards and thumbtacking them to the board and then suddenly that becomes the next season.

We are about to start shooting the final episode, so late in the season a really strong emotional idea became clear to all of us and we decided that is what season two is going to be all about."

For people who spend too much time in jaded corners of the internet like this one, I suppose it's easier to assume that the outside world revolves around them much more than it does. In reality it seems like they always wanted to introduce hairy Klingons, who were bald mainly because of Bryan Fuller alone, and evidently much of season 2 was from ideas that they'd been sitting on for over a year already including Spock and the Enterprise. The idea that it was all a reaction to some disappointed fans seems like wishful thinking by those fans overestimating their importance.
 
Season 1 was already finished writing, and filming wrapped in early October 2017 less than a month after the first episode aired. That includes receiving a hail from Captain Pike and "it's the USS Enterprise" with Sarek and Michael looking at each other. S1 was already full of canon reference, and it was obvious especially since episode 6 that they intended to explore Spock's family dynamic.

Then there were these interviews at the premiere in September:

In this one, Klingon artists Hetrick and Page were asked if all the Klingons are bald and they respond "in this iteration, yes... for now."

In this one Kurtzman talks about "pushing the edges of canon" and how they couldn't fit it all into one season:

"There is a certain point when you are working through the story arc of a season that you start to have ideas you fall in love with that you realize cannot go into that season. So, you start putting them on index cards and thumbtacking them to the board and then suddenly that becomes the next season.

We are about to start shooting the final episode, so late in the season a really strong emotional idea became clear to all of us and we decided that is what season two is going to be all about."

For people who spend too much time in jaded corners of the internet like this one, I suppose it's easier to assume that the outside world revolves around them much more than it does. In reality it seems like they always wanted to introduce hairy Klingons, who were bald mainly because of Bryan Fuller alone, and evidently much of season 2 was from ideas that they'd been sitting on for over a year already including Spock and the Enterprise. The idea that it was all a reaction to some disappointed fans seems like wishful thinking by those fans overestimating their importance.

There are a lot of people who truly believe their comments are being read by the producers and writers. Fans of the show often ask themselves (and the detractors directly) why they would watch and constantly post complaints if they could simply ignore the show.

This is why.

For some of these folks, the post isn't even really meant for anyone on the message board. It's meant for Alex Kurtzman, JJ Abrams, or whoever else they like to fantasize is treating a backwater message board like a Star Trek suggestion box.

It's also why they get so frustrated with "fanboys" and "cheerleaders," because those voices are drowning out their suggestion box entries (in their minds) and that is frustrating.
 
There are a lot of people who truly believe their comments are being read by the producers and writers. Fans of the show often ask themselves (and the detractors directly) why they would watch and constantly post complaints if they could simply ignore the show.

This is why.

For some of these folks, the post isn't even really meant for anyone on the message board. It's meant for Alex Kurtzman, JJ Abrams, or whoever else they like to fantasize is treating a backwater message board like a Star Trek suggestion box.

It's also why they get so frustrated with "fanboys" and "cheerleaders," because those voices are drowning out their suggestion box entries (in their minds) and that is frustrating.
It also doesn't feel like it promotes discussion.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top