Saw the teaser, though I'm not much of a comic book fan, though I enjoyed Superman and Wonder Woman. Xena too, but to my current understanding her origins were from an original 1990s TV show and not an adaptation from a comic strip - and if it was, then Lucy Lawless was quick to make Xena her own and enjoyably so. But is Captain Marvel supposed to be affectless when incognito, was Captain Marvel the same way in previous iterations? Were there any? Or is it the editing of the teaser solely to hand out to tightly clipped sentences?
Loved the meta joke about rubber suits - thank the 1990s for shifting superheroes out of spandex and into suits you don't want to sweat in because it'll smell real bad. Actually, those jokes are more likely going to take one out of the movie's universe. At least it's got good CGI.
Aren't there new characters they can make? Or is Xena the most recent attempt of a new hero that managed to become wildly successful in all its major forms (writing, acting, lowest common denominator audience appreciation)?
Geez Louise, we all knew this was gonna happen but I didn't think it would be THIS early...
https://screenrant.com/captain-marvel-trolls-review-bombing-rotten-tomatoes/
Honestly, I'll never get where folks got the idea that she'd be this "One and only savior" for Endgame or that 1 movie about Carol would destroy the MCU. Haven't they learned after 10 years?!
I found a video, which links to an article, that might shed a belief on the "savior" motif. And if audiences are
perceiving what Brie says
as attacks, then is it surprising that the negative reviews would already be coming out onto that review site?
Anyway, here's the video I mentioned (from "Tha Gospel According to Mark with a Cee"):
He provides link to article he's responding to, so we can read for ourselves and make up our own minds. But is he right or is he wrong, completely or partially, and why or why not?
