So it is an old design. Do we change other iconic designs of the past to "modernize" them? How about classic cinema and paintings/sculptors?
Sure, why not? Then let the audience decide.So it is an old design. Do we change other iconic designs of the past to "modernize" them? How about classic cinema and paintings/sculptors?
Yes. All the time, in fact. Sometimes as an interesting project, sometimes as homage, and sometimes just for the hell of it:So it is an old design. Do we change other iconic designs of the past to "modernize" them? How about classic cinema and paintings/sculptors?
Shoulder pads are eternal.Sure, you guys scoff, but let's not forget how much the TNG modernization benefited the Romulans.
![]()
If that doesn't speak to modern sensibilities, I don't know what does.
Yes. All the time, in fact. Sometimes as an interesting project, sometimes as homage, and sometimes just for the hell of it:
![]()
Why would you expect this not to be the case?
So it is an old design. Do we change other iconic designs of the past to "modernize" them? How about classic cinema and paintings/sculptors?
And a good thing that was too.My opinion is that the Discoprise was change partly because they could and with a committee's idea of "modernizing" it. The 1701 is a character just Kirk and Spock. Modernizing them gave us the JJverse.
Clearly YMMV because I do not think much of the Kelvin universe.And a good thing that was too.
In fact, I'd love for someone to take Nightfever's model and swap it for the 1701-A at the end of The Voyage Home.
Very nice! I feel compelled to point out that you also have to scale down the JJprise.I'm having to fudge the position of the Enterprise a bit because the designs are so differently proportioned.
Ok, let me step back from my personal attitude on it and explain why it was a good thing. First, it was its own timeline, which allowed technologic and design differences. They altered events for Kirk and Spock's life to allow for significant character change-some will love it and others will hate it, but it still works out in the story.Clearly YMMV because I do not think much of the Kelvin universe.
The pylon angle out from the secondary hill on the newer 1701-A works better for me than the 2009 version of the Enterprise. The Discovery version has similar angling to that and the much older versions of the USS Enterpriser (TOS and TMP era) that she should look fine from most angles and any sort of fly by pass.
Much better looking for the camera that the USS Discovery at least.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.