Some interesting back-and-forth here!...
There seems to be an emerging majority here thinking that the Federation has no authority over Mirror Georgiou, because of legal technicalities, which supposedly all seem to weigh in her favor. Even those who want to see her punished are mostly saying it's necessary "just because."
What I haven't heard anybody mention yet is the concept of universal jurisdiction. In present-day international law, it's understood that certain kinds of rights, duties, and norms exist erga omnes — that is, toward all — and that violations of such things are so grave that they don't stop at borders, and outweigh (frankly arbitrary) legalistic concerns such as geographic jurisdiction and national sovereignty. This includes offenses such as extrajudicial executions, war crimes, torture, crimes against humanity, and genocide. Where they were committed is beside the point: the concept is that any properly constituted government tribunal has the right to try and punish such offenses.
Given everything we know about the United Federation of Planets and the extremely high value it puts on the fundamental rights of all sentient beings, I find it impossible to believe that it would not have taken the concept of universal jurisdiction and extended it to the interstellar arena... and frankly, in all likelihood, expanded it.
And oh, look, here's someone who's committed pretty much all of the offenses that trigger it! And she's done so as both an individual and a head of state! Plus there's literally no other state that could claim jurisdiction — the state she represented is currently both leaderless and inaccessible.
It's not as if she just stole a bicycle or something. What you have here is not a recipe for "whoops, we have no jurisdiction over her, guess we gotta let her go." It's a recipe for "put her on trial, throw the book at her, and make her pay for her crimes for the rest of her natural life." I realize due process of law is not usually seen to be as dramatically satisfying as sending someone out in the proverbial Blaze Of Glory, but in this case it's both the morally and legally right thing to do.
Should they trust her? Hell, no. Should they ever give her any position of authority? Hell, no. Should they keep her on a tight leash? Hell, yes. But, as of right now, they have zero standing to impose actual penalty for anything. She hasn't committed any crimes in their universe.
This. Technically she’s a disposed head-of-state in exile, so diplomatic niceties and all that. ... She either has to return to her Universe or go out in a blaze of glory so big it makes the Hobus event look like a campfire by comparison. ... Regardless, there is absolutely no legal justification for locking her up in a jail cell.
I'm pretty sure even in the future, what she's done in the MU could easily be considered a crime, im sure especially in the future there would be some concept akin to human rights.
Georgiou committed horrible acts in her own universe, yes. But the Federation has no jurisdiction there. They would have no legal standing to imprison her. ...
If anything, she is a prisoner of war, and thus must be accorded the same rights as any POW would - which, in her case, means she must be returned to the mirror universe posthaste.
Many people accused of war crimes refuse to recognize the authority of the court to convict them. They get convicted anyway. ...
There's a danger to extending the standards of today too far, especially when it comes to things like jurisdictional standing.
There seems to be an emerging majority here thinking that the Federation has no authority over Mirror Georgiou, because of legal technicalities, which supposedly all seem to weigh in her favor. Even those who want to see her punished are mostly saying it's necessary "just because."
What I haven't heard anybody mention yet is the concept of universal jurisdiction. In present-day international law, it's understood that certain kinds of rights, duties, and norms exist erga omnes — that is, toward all — and that violations of such things are so grave that they don't stop at borders, and outweigh (frankly arbitrary) legalistic concerns such as geographic jurisdiction and national sovereignty. This includes offenses such as extrajudicial executions, war crimes, torture, crimes against humanity, and genocide. Where they were committed is beside the point: the concept is that any properly constituted government tribunal has the right to try and punish such offenses.
Given everything we know about the United Federation of Planets and the extremely high value it puts on the fundamental rights of all sentient beings, I find it impossible to believe that it would not have taken the concept of universal jurisdiction and extended it to the interstellar arena... and frankly, in all likelihood, expanded it.
And oh, look, here's someone who's committed pretty much all of the offenses that trigger it! And she's done so as both an individual and a head of state! Plus there's literally no other state that could claim jurisdiction — the state she represented is currently both leaderless and inaccessible.
It's not as if she just stole a bicycle or something. What you have here is not a recipe for "whoops, we have no jurisdiction over her, guess we gotta let her go." It's a recipe for "put her on trial, throw the book at her, and make her pay for her crimes for the rest of her natural life." I realize due process of law is not usually seen to be as dramatically satisfying as sending someone out in the proverbial Blaze Of Glory, but in this case it's both the morally and legally right thing to do.