So, he basically sat there and thought of a way to get around the lawsuit and rules. Technically legal, but morally bereft.
And now a Part III when we still don't have a Part I and II? It's like it's a purposeful scam.
No it wouldn't.If Alex had put $100,000 of his own money into making the movie, it'd be made already.
Sadly there are plenty of morons who will still pony up the cash.Alec has no morals and of course It’s a scam.
What will happen is like the last indiegogo. He won’t raise enough for the movie but he’ll decide to keep the money abd use it for something else like the studio and nobody can complain because they have to know what are getting into this time.
No
No it wouldn't.
Sadly there are plenty of morons who will still pony up the cash.
It's ok. Remember, Prelude to Axanar was always Part III, IN UNIVERSE!Wait...Part III? "Prelude to Axanar"? Wasn't the documentary film called that? Wasn't that Part 1? or was it Part 2? I'm really confused now. WTF is he doing here?
It's ok. Remember, Prelude to Axanar was always Part III, IN UNIVERSE!![]()
No one will be seated during the heart-pounding Mom waking him up every two hours scene.Axanar part 1. Garth growing up as a boy on a desert planet and we find out the amazing Garth is just a whiny brat.
No one will be seated during the heart-pounding Mom waking him up every two hours scene.
leopard -- spots --> loopholesLFIM - Looking for loopholes in all the wrong places... ( sung to the tune of you know what )
I honestly don't see this at all. Maybe productions will be more cautious, maybe CBS will keep a closer eye - but the ONLY thing I can see changing is people being a little more reluctant to take the piss.
Whether by arrogance and ego or just misguided stupidity, Axanar was presenting itself as a professional production and crossed a lot of lines. Unless other fan films want to do the same, I think it's pretty clear that they're all fine.
The argument of brand confusion won't match either as no one in their right mind would think Continues New Voyages with their upgraded replication of a 1960's world would be a current and modern piece of output from CBS.
Thats not confusion. Thats just bad research.
To be fair - that means absolutely nothing. News outlets aren't exactly paragons of perfection. They're all about getting the content out as fast as possible (before anyone else does) and have more time to fill with news constantly being pushed out - even when there's nothing to say or there's a situation that they watch for hours trying to turn something into nothing.
It's not just the content thats downgraded, but the staff. Cheap staff and quick results - particularly within entertainment news - are more important than putting the homework in and mistakes have been made all across the board especially with genre shows and brands.
Put it this way - I've done professional reviews for a national audience on behalf of one of the top broadcasters in the UK. I do have some training (not really, a year before I switched degree's and I spent 90% of the time substituting the pub for the classroom) but they didn't know that. They never asked that. They never questioned me, or discussed much with me. But a researcher read my blog (in the days I could be bothered updating it) and considered me an expert.
Gods knows who CNN decided was their expert that day; but I have the feeling the poor soul was given the task for some stupid reason and no one questioned the results.
"Almost"? They DO deserve what they get if they fall for his scam again. It's the only way they'll learn.At this point they almost deserve what they get if they donate again.
And let’s face it, if Axanar proved anything, it was that great Star Trek need not cost a fortune.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.