Are those Jack's pants and suspenders?
Are those Jack's pants and suspenders?
Well, it's not like it's just clothing. Lift, biscuit, flat, solicitor, loo, billion, caretaker, etc., just to name a few off the top of my head.
So what would my chances of scoring be if I were wearing Tom Baker pants?
That's what I meant by suit; slacks and a jacket - not strictly matching. I didn't realize Capaldi was complementing, not matching. Smith definitely pulled off the cranky-professor look, but he seemed too young to add proper gravitas to his role, for the most part. Tenant killed the gravitas in almost every episode - especially when he gives the camera that angry-stare (except for the romancing. that was horrible). An angry Time Lord is terrifying to behold, indeed.Oh, good point. I guess that, strictly speaking, the word "suit" refers to a matched set of items, not just what kind of garments they are individually. So you can be wearing a vest, slacks, and jacket, but if they're not part of the same set, then they aren't technically a suit. Is that it?
That's what I meant by suit; slacks and a jacket - not strictly matching. I didn't realize Capaldi was complementing, not matching. Smith definitely pulled off the cranky-professor look, but he seemed too young to add proper gravitas to his role, for the most part. Tenant killed the gravitas in almost every episode - especially when he gives the camera that angry-stare (except for the romancing. that was horrible). An angry Time Lord is terrifying to behold, indeed.
Fair enough. And Capaldi looks mean even when he is sleepingPerception is a funny thing. I think Smith nailed it naturally, much as I like Tennant I always felt like he was trying too hard, like you could see him acting.
And Capaldi looks mean even when he is sleeping![]()
Pants:
![]()
Trousers:
![]()
I'm not going to show you what suspenders are as it's probably against the T&Cs of using these forums.
I've been involved in the fashion industry a few times in various capacities and people who say "trousers" are a rare breed.Sartorially-minded Americans always say "trousers" when describing a dressier garment.
Kor
I've been involved in the fashion industry a few times in various capacities and people who say "trousers" are a rare breed.
I'm talking more about connoisseurs such as people who write blogs about menswear and use Savile Row terminology, and bespoke tailors who do the same.I've been involved in the fashion industry a few times in various capacities and people who say "trousers" are a rare breed.
Today's fashion-forward suits definitely can't be described as "slack."In my experience, the kind of pants/trousers that go with a suit are often called slacks.
Today's fashion-forward suits definitely can't be described as "slack."
Yeah, of course, obviously there are plenty of differences, but they're spread out among a variety of different subject matters. My point is that there seems to be an unusually high number pertaining to clothing specifically. Like, yes, on the subject of buildings, there are differences like "lift" and "flat" and which floor is the first floor, but we use the same words for stairs and windows and doors and ceilings and walls and such. And some food terms like biscuits and chips and spag bol are different, but there are a lot that are the same -- ham, cheese, tea, coffee, milk, apple, tomato (pronunciation aside), etc. And a lorry may have a spare tyre in the boot and use a satnav while driving on the motorway, but... okay, well, maybe there are a lot of different terms concentrated in that subject as well.
Perception is a funny thing. I think Smith nailed it naturally, much as I like Tennant I always felt like he was trying too hard, like you could see him acting.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.