• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Star Trek: Discovery 1x09 - "Into the Forest I Go"

Rate the episode...


  • Total voters
    330
So my question is - why the hell didn't Burnham KILL L'Rell?

I mean, L'Rell could have come to before they set up the sensors and such and she could have ratted out Burnham and Tyler to the other Klingons. Yeah, I know she was a prisoner too, or off sulking over the loss of her allies, but it was a dumb move to not finish her.
And have fans going on and on about her being a cold hearted killer who murders helpless prisoners?
 
And have fans going on and on about her being a cold hearted killer who murders helpless prisoners?
Yeah I don't get it. Burnham behaves like a starfleet officer and STILL gets criticised for it. Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

No WAI!!! You mean people who don't like (but continuously watch) Star Trek Discovery would actually complain no matter what the show does...??? You mean to tell me they would be inconsistent and generate complaints regardless of what the quality, direction, and content is of the show???

I'm shocked, I say!! SHOCKED!!
 
The last statement doesn't follow from those that precede it. At least, by no means necessarily.
Sorry that wasn't clear enough, I meant that he saw himself and L'Rell having sex before he became Tyler, when he was still Voq and they were lovers. It could also explain why she took and "interest" in him, because he her mind she was just getting back together with her lover.
 
So my question is - why the hell didn't Burnham KILL L'Rell?

I mean, L'Rell could have come to before they set up the sensors and such and she could have ratted out Burnham and Tyler to the other Klingons. Yeah, I know she was a prisoner too, or off sulking over the loss of her allies, but it was a dumb move to not finish her.
Star fleet officers aren't in the habit of shooting to kill.
 
The moment they mentioned the ship of the dead was coming, it wasn't a stretch to guess that was the big target for the good guys to go after, and that they'd crack the cloaking code. Finding Cornwell was a given. Tyler freaking out was ridiculously contrived given he squared off with L'Rell during his and Lorca's escape and didn't flinch. Kol was a cardboard bad guy and met an appropriate end. Stamets and the spore drive follies were another blatantly obvious turn. I've been watching Trek since the 60's myself, and this was by the numbers predictable writing.
By your logic, anytime the ship of the dead was to show up it meant its destruction.
 
The visuals were lovely. The pacing was taut. The plot was a warehouse of Swiss cheese. Predictable, contrived, chewing gum for the eyes and brain. A fine story as long as you don't ask questions or look too closely. One thing I will give Discovery credit for - it has lost my interest much faster than Enterprise did. 3/10 for the writers telegraphing their punches worse than James T. Kirk in a poorly scripted bar fight.

The moment they mentioned the ship of the dead was coming, it wasn't a stretch to guess that was the big target for the good guys to go after, and that they'd crack the cloaking code. Finding Cornwell was a given. Tyler freaking out was ridiculously contrived given he squared off with L'Rell during his and Lorca's escape and didn't flinch. Kol was a cardboard bad guy and met an appropriate end. Stamets and the spore drive follies were another blatantly obvious turn. I've been watching Trek since the 60's myself, and this was by the numbers predictable writing.

So, serious question then...honestly not trying to antagonize...

Are you unsubscribing now at this inflection point and will you not be returning to watch the second half? Because if this was still garbage to you...I have a feeling you aren't going to be onboard with anything that comes later.
 
No WAI!!! You mean people who don't like (but continuously watch) Star Trek Discovery would actually complain no matter what the show does...??? You mean to tell me they would be inconsistent and generate complaints regardless of what the quality, direction, and content is of the show???

I'm shocked, I say!! SHOCKED!!

I know, right? By the way I like your sig.
 
So, serious question then...honestly not trying to antagonize...

Are you unsubscribing now at this inflection point and will you not be returning to watch the second half? Because if this was still garbage to you...I have a feeling you aren't going to be onboard with anything that comes later.
Yes, I'm through. There's been no substantive surprises and too many plot holes for me to bother watching further. I know they're trying to do a lot with a limited number of episodes. But I expect more from a show sporting the Star Trek name.
 
For myself, I like learning about this Star Trek universe. Yet, I have not developed an understanding of these characters. After watching the episode twice, there is a scene which I do not comprehend on an emotional level. Burnham and Tyler returned to the Discovery bridge. There is emotional communication between Burnham and members of the crew. I can not read what is happening here. It is vague, confusing to me. For me, this scene is a major blockage in the momentum of the episode.

I have recently seen "Stranger Things". For myself, this is how a serialized show should be done. I developed an affection for the characters and I was behind in them in their journey. I do not have the same feelings for the characters in Discovery. I never found myself, as I did with the latest episode, wondering what the hell was being sent in the emotional connections between characters. And, when what some consider the worst episode of "Stranger Things" was on the tv - the seventh episode of season 2 - I did not find myself turning away in boredom or finding it cringey. There was two episodes of "Discovery" where I did this - the episode with Mudd and the Pahvo episode.

I am more excited for a third season of "Stranger Things" then I am for the rest of the first season of Discovery and for the eventual second season, whenever that comes out. I will continue watching the latter show as I am a devoted Star Trek fan. I like learning about this universe. However, my enthusiasm for the series has been dampened considerably.
 
For myself, I like learning about this Star Trek universe. Yet, I have not developed an understanding of these characters. After watching the episode twice, there is a scene which I do not comprehend on an emotional level. Burnham and Tyler returned to the Discovery bridge. There is emotional communication between Burnham and members of the crew. I can not read what is happening here. It is vague, confusing to me. For me, this scene is a major blockage in the momentum of the episode.

I have recently seen "Stranger Things". For myself, this is how a serialized show should be done. I developed an affection for the characters and I was behind in them in their journey. I do not have the same feelings for the characters in Discovery. I never found myself, as I did with the latest episode, wondering what the hell was being sent in the emotional connections between characters. And, when what some consider the worst episode of "Stranger Things" was on the tv - the seventh episode of season 2 - I did not find myself turning away in boredom or finding it cringey. There was two episodes of "Discovery" where I did this - the episode with Mudd and the Pahvo episode.

I am more excited for a third season of "Stranger Things" then I am for the rest of the first season of Discovery and for the eventual second season, whenever that comes out. I will continue watching the latter show as I am a devoted Star Trek fan. I like learning about this universe. However, my enthusiasm for the series has been dampened considerably.
No one will question you for enjoying Stranger Things more than Discovery. It's one of the best streaming shows out there.
 
Great episode -- a hard 9.

Loved Burnham manipulating Kol into a fight in order to buy time for Discovery to obtain the telemetry from the relays. As to the notion that Burnham should not have survived the fight, in addition to others pointing out that super strength was never a Klingon trait, SM-G pointed out on After Trek that Burnham's main strategy in the fight was simply dodging. She didn't come close to actually defeating him.

I yelled out loud when she grabbed Georgiou's badge from Kol. I know, it was obvious when Kol showed it, that she would not leave Kol's ship without it. But that didn't take away from the greatness of the moment.

Loving Lorca. Classic example of a character who is interesting but not in a touchy feely way. His refusal to leave Pahvos defenseless even if it meant disobeying orders was (as others have also pointed out), so Kirk-like.

As to the 'Tyler is Voq' theory, I have no idea. In season 3 of Agents of Shield, I was so positive that Andrew wasn't also "Lash", that I swore I'd eat my keyboard if it turned out that he was. I wIas dead wrong, so I'll wait and see about Tyler/Voq.

Gonna be hard to wait all these weeks for the next episode.

Oh, and really sorry to hear of the apparent loss of some of our favorite fan/hate watchers.
 
If Hugh and Paul were going to see La Boheme when they went on leave, why didn't targeting the Ship of the Dead require 525,600 spore jumps?
On After Trek one of the trivia items was that the writers of the episode did want to make the number of jumps "525,600", but didn't because the number was considered crazy. Also, La Boheme was used as a homage to Rent and Wilson and Anthony. Also, the number they did go with, 133, was an homage to the pilot episode of nuBSG, "33".
Maybe that is the real reason Lorca convinced Stamets to make that last jump and then overrode the navigation to send the ship to an alternate universe? Lorca did it to escape reassignment and possibly punishment. It's the perfect escape because Starfleet can't get him if he is in an unknown parallel universe.
It has already been pointed out that Lorca did not ask Stammets to do another jump and that it was solely Stammet's idea to do one last jump. Also, why would Starfleet need to trick Lorca into coming in? Why would the Vulcan admiral not simply have ordered Lorca to come in to answer charges? Lorca may, or may not have diverted the ship, but if he did, I doubt seriously if the reason will turn out to be that Lorca was fleeing Starfleet.
 
Last edited:
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top