And there's nothing wrong with that. The Orville is its own thing. It's not Trek or Firefly, and that's okay.
I don't remember anyone saying Orville is Family Guy in space recently, but I do remember you saying "Discovery makes Deep Space Nine look like The Orville" a couple days ago, and now we're talking about Firefly. Maybe we should all stop trying to define shows according to other shows and just accept each show for what it is. The Orville is not Family Guy, or Star Trek, or Firefly. It is clearly a product of a love for Star Trek, but also clearly a product of Seth Macfarlane. Isn't that accurate enough?The audacity of people trying to accurately define something instead of just accepting some folks "IT'S JUST FAMILY GUY IN SPACE!!!"
Embrace the glory holes, for then you will learn to truly love The Orville for what it is.
Exactly.And there's nothing wrong with that. The Orville is its own thing. It's not Trek or Firefly, and that's okay.
that "thimble" is kind of a defining aesthetic of that show.
I wouldn't say that the gags like glory hole define the show, rather that they're a part of the show. However big or small, those jokes are a part of a piece and to try to exagerrate or hand wave it is a misunderstanding. Seth obviously loves Trek as it shows, but he didn't make The Orville because he anticipated that there would be disenchanted Trekkies over Discovery. The whole point is that he's doing his own riff on Trek with his brand of humor laced in with the dramatic elements.Maybe in the advertising, but inside of the show itself, by Seth's own admission the show leans hard into dramedy territory, and is not by any stretch a straight up comedy.
I'm definitely not saying Orville needs to be more or less of anything. I'm saying the comedy aspects are greatly exaggerated here. For the first few episodes I was shocked it wasn't much more packed with gags and jokes and outright camp. The show is earnest in it's love of classic Trek and it should be given kudos for that.
I mean, look, I've seen the glory hole thing brought up at least three times in the last two pages, and it's what... ten seconds out of one episode? I'm sorry, i'm just not seeing how it defines the whole show. Maybe it is an agree-to-disagree situation, but i'm just not seeing it... And it has nothing to do with being unreasonable for this or that or whatever. I used to be that way, back in the days of Enterprise.
I can absolutely see why Orville doesn't appeal to people. Same for Discovery. I have reservations about both. I will say, though, that Discovery has actually hit me deep in the wells a couple times(i'm actually worried for Lorca and Stamets. I'm invested in where they are going.), and Orville has given me a nice warm-fuzzy nostalgic feeling.
Nope. I take them at the same measure, as their own thing. They both have serious moments, and silly moments.I realized recently that one reason I love The Orville so much is that fans will never be able to take it seriously in the way that trekkies do Star Trek without missing the point.
Um, there was plenty of Starship porn in the first two episodes - for both Feds and Klingons.Someone upthread brought this up and I wholeheartedly agree. There is a severe lack of starship porn in Discovery. How come a Star Trek parody understands nerds' love for awesome starships flying gracefully past the "camera"? There's never any proper exterior shots that lost more than three seconds. Come on, people.
Apparently it is interesting enough though to keep coming back in a forum and complain about it.....I don't need or expect a "real Star Trek" -Trek had its day and is gone. Trying to resurrect it is like begging Disney to make a sequel to Pinocchio.
No, but they're more than happy to sequelize whatever made them a shitload of money last year.
I stopped watching Discovery because it's a TV series that isn't interesting enough to trade an hour for.
Maybe in the advertising, but inside of the show itself, by Seth's own admission the show leans hard into dramedy territory, and is not by any stretch a straight up comedy.
I'm definitely not saying Orville needs to be more or less of anything. I'm saying the comedy aspects are greatly exaggerated here. For the first few episodes I was shocked it wasn't much more packed with gags and jokes and outright camp. The show is earnest in it's love of classic Trek and it should be given kudos for that.
I mean, look, I've seen the glory hole thing brought up at least three times in the last two pages, and it's what... ten seconds out of one episode? I'm sorry, i'm just not seeing how it defines the whole show. Maybe it is an agree-to-disagree situation, but i'm just not seeing it... And it has nothing to do with being unreasonable for this or that or whatever. I used to be that way, back in the days of Enterprise.
I can absolutely see why Orville doesn't appeal to people. Same for Discovery. I have reservations about both. I will say, though, that Discovery has actually hit me deep in the wells a couple times(i'm actually worried for Lorca and Stamets. I'm invested in where they are going.), and Orville has given me a nice warm-fuzzy nostalgic feeling.
I stopped watching Discovery because it's a TV series that isn't interesting enough to trade an hour for.
Apparently it is interesting enough though to keep coming back in a forum and complain about it.....![]()
It doesn't for me.seth can admit and say whatever he wants, the execution simply doesnt bear that out. it isnt about jokes per minute. whenever you have this much of this childish humor in your show it greatly colors and effects the drama. no matter what you say youre trying to do.
All I saw was blurry shapes zooming past the screenUm, there was plenty of Starship porn in the first two episodes - for both Feds and Klingons.
All I saw was blurry shapes zooming past the screen
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.