• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Watching DS9 all the way through (for the first time ever)

Evil Robert

Admiral
Admiral
Hi y'all. Long time no post :D Hope you'll allow an old timer like me a chance to ramble on for a bit :D Just thoughts from a crusty old dude/outsider to the series/once upon a time mod.

I just recently finished a massive watch of DS9 from start to finish for the first time. While I caught a number of season six and seven episodes… maybe 16/17 years ago… yikes… (and I have seen the odd episode here or there), I never really have had the opportunity to watch it as one complete set before. So thanks to Netflix (and having finished a binge of ENT) I set out on this beast.

I gotta admit going into watching this show, DS9 was certainly coloured by the memories of those Niner wars these foriis had back in the day (2002-4!), and even after all these years, it did feel like watching the enemy in certain parts! Lol

I’m also way too lazy to do episode by episode reviews and final thoughts, so this is what you get :D This is just a collection of thoughts and such, no real pattern to them, query, discuss and laugh along with me, but I thought I’d share as somebody who is only these days a marginal fan of Star Trek to begin with (though I am excited for Discovery).

Over all, I did enjoy watching it, though my goodness, those first few seasons where painful. However I only ever stopped watching and skipped two episodes total. One being one of the umpteen dozen time O’Brien was trapped behind enemy lines (Miles was seriously the butt-monkey of the early seasons! He seemed to be constantly knocked out cold, got stuck on the wrong side of a conflict, and all the annoying crap seem to fall onto him, being married to a shill). The other one, was one of the Klingon Honour episodes with Worf... doing something Klingon... just because. I will confess, regardless of series, Klingon episodes are my least favourite. And ones where it seems to be nothing but Worf talking about honour are the most painful by far.

Hey, I made it through all the Ferengi episodes, that must count for something!

Personally to me though, the greatest crime an episode can be, is that of being boring (which is probably half the reason I cannot stand Klingon Honour eps). Bad episodes can often be entertaining (even in an awful way), or at least can be watchable. This is why I don’t hate the Ferengi episodes or ‘Come Along Home’ (though I acknowledge the WTF stupidity of the later). In fact I found the most painful early episode to be ‘If Wishes Where Horses’. My lord that episode just dragged on.

I am not sure if I am going to describe the following the right way, so forgive me if my though process fails me lol - While I enjoyed the show, and I thought it was a good show, but I felt it struggled to cast off the chains (at least during the first 5 seasons) of that post-1987 Gene Roddenberry vision/idealism which I felt delivered a universe full of perfect people living in a perfect society. I mean DS9 did the best at bucking this convention compared to TNG or VOY (both of which tended to wrap up issues of moral ambiguity in 44 mins), but I think it also suffered from this direction as well.

Many times I felt like the show was screaming to be released from burden and be free to explore the grey. This Utopian Pacifism I think did hinder it greatly at various points (at least until the Dominion War started - but then again,how much of that war was a result of them trying to stay true to their ideals as opposed to nipping an enemy in the bud before they got too powerful by going on the offensive early?).

Whereas Babylon 5 or Battlestar Galactica could create their own universe from scratch, where the humans where shown to be fallible and far from perfect, DS9 had to use a template where it wasn’t necessarily a perfect fit for the story the writers wanted to tell and thus many times the characters ‘sense of duty to some golden ideals’ won over in the end of the episode (mainly from Sisko). This trope I felt was just as annoying as any of Voyager's multiple technobabble deux ex machina endings. At times I feel like the show was wanting to go darker, grittier and more morally ambiguous but it couldn’t get to the level it wanted to either.

Random other thoughts:

By far the best character for me was Gul Dukat. My word man, he wasn’t just the best developed villain in Star Trek history, he is up there in one of the best developed character period! With a complex and compelling storyline that rarely reset itself! I could hate, empathize, feel sorry, feel disgust and even casually like the character, often in the same episode. He was layed and multi facilitated and quiet magnetic. I guess props need to go to Marc Alaimo for delivery such a performance, because very few others, even permanent cast members, in any of the shows, I dare say came close.

Jadzia over Ezri – I remember when I watched years ago I like Ezri, but that was basically only having a handful of season 5 and 6 episode of Jadzia to judge by. While Ezri was certainly delightfully cute and perky, she didn’t have that cool sophistication and presence that Jadzia brought to the cast and having now watched the show fully through, Ezri’s presence in Season 7 is much for jarring then it was first time around. What is it with Terry Farrell with leaving shows a season before it ends? Hahaha.

The kid that played Molly was awful. I know most child actors are pretty dire at the best of times, but Hana Hatae was particularly painful.

I really failed to buy into most of the romantic pairings on the show. Almost all of the various couples combinations the show gave us really didn’t have much chemistry between them. On the other hand the show did unrequited mooning over somebody pretty well. On the other hand, I absolutely loved the episode 'Looking for par'Mach in All the Wrong Places', so i guess there was the occasion the writers did strike gold with the hooking up various characters.

I kinda wonder what the budget was during the seasons. So many caves. Many many many caves. It was like Bajor was riddled with so many caves, basements, cellars, cubby holes et cetera I’m kinda surprised it collapsed onto itself for all the holes in the earth! I felt some episodes suffered from this - the Bajoran coup episodes in early season 2 I felt lacked a certain punch cause all the action scenes took place in cheap looking caves.

All in all, I did enjoy it, though I wished on occasion they'd change up the establishment shot of DS9 with the Defiant in the foreground and that same random starship in the back!

Ergh... I probably have many other thoughts. Mostly positive, though darned if I can remember any at the moment lol. Needle me and I might recall :D
 
A lot of what makes DS9 good is the side characters. I'm surprised you didn't mention Weyoun. His character is tons of fun. Garak, General Martok, The Female Changeling, Quark, and Dukat are all great IMO. These characters plus the main cast creates a rich environment to tell stories in.

The show had lots of nice twists and took Star Trek to places you never expected.

"In The Pale Moonlight" is one of my favorite episodes of television ever.
 
I kinda wonder what the budget was during the seasons. So many caves. Many many many caves. It was like Bajor was riddled with so many caves, basements, cellars, cubby holes et cetera I’m kinda surprised it collapsed onto itself for all the holes in the earth! I felt some episodes suffered from this - the Bajoran coup episodes in early season 2 I felt lacked a certain punch cause all the action scenes took place in cheap looking caves.
I couldn't say what the budget was like each season, but it was generally strained. I didn't get the money that TNG or Voyager got. What may have made it more apparent is that ISB would put as much money as possible into the epic episodes, which would then be followed by long strings of bottle shows.
 
A lot of what makes DS9 good is the side characters. I'm surprised you didn't mention Weyoun. His character is tons of fun. Garak, General Martok, The Female Changeling, Quark, and Dukat are all great IMO. These characters plus the main cast creates a rich environment to tell stories in..

You are right, the secondary characters where gold :)

Especially since a few of them where up there with Jake in actual episode appearances.
While I appricate them not shoehorning the kid in every episode (unlike Wesley), though sometimes you forgot he was even on the show!

And it made shoehorning other characters (mainly Quark) into some episodes much more obvious lol

Many Cardassian characters had such meaty stories. Really fleshed out and enjoyable.
 
I couldn't say what the budget was like each season, but it was generally strained. I didn't get the money that TNG or Voyager got. What may have made it more apparent is that ISB would put as much money as possible into the epic episodes, which would then be followed by long strings of bottle shows.

I think iI remember reading around the time DSN firdst aired i was around the US$2-2.5m per episode.

But there is nothing wrong with "bottle" episodes provided they are done well. The bottle episodes can be used for charaterisation building. For example "Duet" would be a bottle episodes minimal guest stars and use of existing sets. Yet it is considered one of DSN's best if not one of ST as whole best episodes.
 
But there is nothing wrong with "bottle" episodes provided they are done well. The bottle episodes can be used for charaterisation building. For example "Duet" would be a bottle episodes minimal guest stars and use of existing sets. Yet it is considered one of DSN's best if not one of ST as whole best episodes.
I'm not claiming that bottle episodes are a problem, either or DS9 or in general. I am saying that drawing funds from one set of episodes in order to make a smaller number look more spectacular had an effect on how the series could look overall. "Trials and Tribble-ations" was one of the most expensive episodes produced because of the special challenges of combining special effects and live action. It was one of the crowning achievements of what I think is the franchise's best season. However, it meant that other episodes had to be produced more cheaply: fewer special effects, fewer new sets, shorter location shoots. Luckily , they still went out on location, but others, like Rapture (another of my favorites), suffered: the revelation of Ba'hala was a serious letdown for an episode that carried so much meaning for the development of the series' lead character. Although it was not a bottle episode, WYLB suffered the same fate: prioratizing special effects meant that there was no money to have sets and locations for the trip to the Fire Caves. As a consequence, the Emissary met his end on the same sets as appeared in Move Along Home.
 
I liked Ezri much better than Jadzia. It always irked me how Jadzia was good at everything, everybody liked her...klingons, ferengi, everyone. and how all the men wanted to sleep with her. It was too much
Agree. Jadzia was the worst character on the show. People always complain about Jake, but a Jake centric episode is better than a Jadzia centric episode.

She's bland. Her episodes are boring. The whole Xena Warrior Princess shtick she does is lame.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kkt
I'm in a similar marathon situation, only my quest will begin at season 5.
Finnish television broadcasted DS9 from season 1 to season 4 long ago and only later from season 5 onwards. So, for me, seasons 1-4 are familiar but starting from season 5, I have watched the episodes only few times... maybe once?
Kind of exciting, almost like watching them for the first time, again.
 
Last edited:
Season 5 is where it gets good. I suppose Season 4 had an uptick with quality, but you certainly feel it more in 5.
 
The pre-Worf seasons have a different feel to them but some of my favorite episodes are in those. I also didn't mind the Bajoran political stuff as much as some. Those season 1 episodes can be rough because they were still figuring out the characters.
 
Many times I felt like the show was screaming to be released from burden and be free to explore the grey.

I think the journey for this series to find itself is part of what I find so endearing about it. There are strokes of where it would end up going in the very first episode, which is awesome. And we see the slow bloom of character arcs in the early seasons. And then at some point, the series really takes off. But I think that full transition happened for me earlier than it seemed to occur for you. I need to do another rewatch before commenting on the exact moment, if there was one. I'm currently rewatching TOS, which is A LOT more enjoyable for me now than it was a few years ago for some reason.

The kid that played Molly was awful.

Oh my goodness, I thought she was so adorable. It was her mommy who was annoying! ;)

I really failed to buy into most of the romantic pairings on the show.

I think the only one that didn't work for me was Bashir+Ezri. I think Ezri+Jake might have been a nice connection (wasn't he old enough by Season 7)?

I will say that the episodes that were least interesting to me were a couple of the Klingon episodes. I can't remember which at the moment. And there was one Ferengi episode where all of the Ferengi characters worked together for something, and I recall it seemed very out of character for some of them, and I also recall falling asleep during that episode. Haha!

The pre-Worf seasons have a different feel to them but some of my favorite episodes are in those. I also didn't mind the Bajoran political stuff as much as some. Those season 1 episodes can be rough because they were still figuring out the characters.

That represents my feelings pretty well. Add the Bajoran religious stuff as part of what I enjoyed (and I know many people HATED). From what I recall, there was something about Worf joining the cast that really loosened up the other characters. I don't know if the actors were just trying to make Dorn think they were cool kids too, or what. Haha. But it was like a weight was lifted as soon as he joined. Jadzia was fun and interesting almost overnight! Could have also been writing team or producer/show runner changes? I admit I am ignorant to the timing of those sorts of behind-the-scenes changes.
 
I think the only one that didn't work for me was Bashir+Ezri. I think Ezri+Jake might have been a nice connection (wasn't he old enough by Season 7)?

I would tend to agree, but how much consternation would it cause if it weren't Jake and Dax in the last scene! Perhaps if they had a promisingly romantic, yet undefined relationship it could work.

From what I recall, there was something about Worf joining the cast that really loosened up the other characters.

I credit the goat!
 
And then at some point, the series really takes off. But I think that full transition happened for me earlier than it seemed to occur for you. I need to do another rewatch before commenting on the exact moment, if there was one.

I do think the start of season 4 represents a significant step forward in terms of quality and storytelling focus, but the point where the series clicks for me is in those run of shows at the end of season 2, starting with "The Maquis." You have 7 episodes that are all really strong and represent different key DS9 strengths: deconstruction of the Federation/TNG idealogy ("The Maquis"), examinations of morally ambiguous characters ("The Wire"), an ability to wander off on interesting tangents ("Crossover"), deep dives into alien societies that we stick with for the whole series ("The Collaborator" and "Tribunal"), and then wind it up with the first real Dominion encounter ("The Jem'Hadar"). In season 3 things are still getting refined, but the show has found itself and it's unique voice, they've figured out where their strengths lie and what to focus on.

I think the only one that didn't work for me was Bashir+Ezri. I think Ezri+Jake might have been a nice connection (wasn't he old enough by Season 7)?

I think I loved this idea the last time I heard it, but now I'm suddenly grossed out thinking: Curzon was interacting with Jake as a baby, Jadzia was interacting with Jake as a little kid. Obviously Ezri is different but she carries those memories, I think it would have squicked me out some.
 
Last edited:
I agree that the Romantic relationships on DS9 are hard to buy. Just because it's scripted- doesn't mean the actors have the chemistry to pull it off. Aaaaand...they didn't! (To me.)

It goes beyond Romance. Friendships: I don't buy Bashir & O'Brien as friends. They just wouldn't be friends. Not like as written. Meaney and El Fadil don't pull it off.

There's shows where you can tell the cast is having a ball & it shows on screen- Like "Love Boat", "TNG", "The Office" (UK)......then there's shows like DS9. This is a company off actors that weren't warm toward each other. It shows. I'd bet big money the producers Regretted hiring Avery Brooks & Terry Farrell.

The only twosome that worked off the bat, was Odo & Quark. Right up there with Spock & McCoy! The peripheral characters and guest stars were much better cast than the regulars, in my opinion!

Gul DuKat was good. But making him Bajoran was a "Jumping the Shark" moment if there ever was one! How the heck could his skull structure be altered to a Bajoran & Back?! Gimme a break!

I'm sound like I hate DS9. I don't. I think it's the best written series of the bunch, overall (Bajoran Religion/Ferengis notwithstanding). That's huge. That's why so many people also say it's the best. But a series is more than its writing. Otherwise, It'd be a book. It's about its company of actors and it's setting. And on those aspects, every other Star Trek series whips DS9.
 
This is a company off actors that weren't warm toward each other.
Meaney and Siddig were famously friends (they went drinking,especially to Irish pubs around LA, and Meaney delighted getting Siddig into trouble with the expatriot patrons). Siddig and Visitor married and had a child. Shimerman and Auberjonois were close, and Shimerman tended to draw in the guest actors. And of course, there was the nearly familial relationship between Brooks and Lofton.

So it wasn't TNG's level of interaction. So what! We've found out that many series' casts did not have the level of friendship or camaraderie that was portrayed at the time, including the much vaunted Friends.Indeed, there was plenty of tensions within the cast of the original Star Trek, which significant competition between two of the leads.

Edited for language.
 
Last edited:
...Friendships: I don't buy Bashir & O'Brien as friends. They just wouldn't be friends. Not like as written. Meaney and El Fadil don't pull it off...I'd bet big money the producers Regretted hiring Avery Brooks & Terry Farrell...

Wow, I think this is the first time I have ever seen anyone say they don't like or don't believe the Bashir/O'Brien relationship!

As for Brooks and Ferrell, just check out the post-DS9 commentary, like the stuff for the upcoming documentary or "The Fifty-Year Mission: The Next 25 Years", Behr and the other producers only have praise for the two actors as far as I have seen. Nobodies perfect, but they seem eminently valued if not straight up liked.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top