![]()
You don't have to future proof things that won't air in the future.

![]()
You don't have to future proof things that won't air in the future.
The Vimeo video for the fourth season is out!
You'd probably have to pay through the nose just to get access to the archived film - companies are very protective of their assets and are likely to impose conditions that would mean you'd be unlikely ever to see any meaningful return on your investment - although it seems you don't mind about that.Popping in to promise everyone that should I ever win the lottery or otherwise become a multi-millionaire, I will foot the bill for DS9 in HD. That would be my priority.
Well, after paying taxes anyway.
You'd probably have to pay through the nose just to get access to the archived film - companies are very protective of their assets and are likely to impose conditions that would mean you'd be unlikely ever to see any meaningful return on your investment - although it seems you don't mind about that.
DS9 in HD on my shelf would be my return on investment lol.You'd probably have to pay through the nose just to get access to the archived film - companies are very protective of their assets and are likely to impose conditions that would mean you'd be unlikely ever to see any meaningful return on your investment - although it seems you don't mind about that.
https://trekmovie.com/2017/08/27/in...-something-familiar-with-star-trek-discovery/Will we see DS9 in HD?
Anthony: Let’s wrap up with returning to the subject of HD. Do you know if there has been any talk at CBS of following up the project to redo Star Trek: The Next Generation in HD with one for Deep Space Nine? Or do the figures not add up for doing it with DS9?
Ira: I am only able to comment on what has been told to me. I have not been to any of those discussions if they have been held. What I have been told is that TNG underperformed expectations. So, I have no clue if that is true, but I know DS9 has a lot of technical issues with regards to the effects and stuff. And it is not cheap and that is the bottom line. These big corporations don’t like to pay money unless they see a payoff down the line. I imagine they don’t see a payoff as of yet.
On the positive side, CBS has been much more supportive of this documentary. The Indigogo campaign really woke up a lot of people and the fans should feel really good. The fans that contributed to the campaign did a great service – not just to documentary – but to the standing of the show within this corporate environment. So kudos to them.
Now, if CBSAA held exclusive rights to the DS9 HD remaster...
That's what Paramount was doing in the 90's during their original run. It's called the all barter system. The stations received the episodes for free, but Paramount was allowed to sell 7 minutes of the commercial time to national advertisers, while the stations themselves sold the remaining time to local advertisers.And the one station who airs TNG remastered doesn't seem to want to pay for seasons 3-7...never been able to figure that one out.
So, unless they GIVE away DS9/Voyager to stations (which defeats the purpose of them making money) I don't think anyone here would bother.
I seriously don't think the remaster of a twenty-plus year old show would drive enough subscriptions to be worth while.
Watching the Heroes & Icons broadcast of DS9 just proves how badly DS9 needs the HD remaster/upgrade.
Could someone tell me what the difference is between a 720 HD episode and a 180 HD beyond the ovious thing that the 180 is going to be better. IS 720 what you get on DVD and 180 on Blu-Ray?
Jason
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.