• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Patrick Stewart Wants To Become A U.S. Citizen To Fight Trump

Actors getting involved in politics are just fine with Republicans, as long as it's actors who conform to their worldview

The same can be said--with ease--about Democrats; they habitually blast / attempt to ridicule any entertainer who happens to be conservative, right down to the long dried up Hitler comparisons in some cases.
 
The same can be said--with ease--about Democrats; they habitually blast / attempt to ridicule any entertainer who happens to be conservative, right down to the long dried up Hitler comparisons in some cases.
Unless you can show me a widespread pattern of Democrats saying that celebrities in general shouldn't comment on politics, rather than criticism of individual celebrities for their specific views, then no, it's not remotely the same thing at all.
 
Unless you can show me a widespread pattern of Democrats saying that celebrities in general shouldn't comment on politics, rather than criticism of individual celebrities for their specific views, then no, it's not remotely the same thing at all.

I said those who happen to be conservative--(not your "in general")--a minority in the majority liberal entertainment business, and one often ridiculed for whatever position they hold. In some cases, its gone beyond mere position, as revealed by Ben Affleck (in 2014) when he said:

"When I watch a guy I know is a big Republican, part of me thinks, I probably wouldn't like this person if I met him, or we would have different opinions. That (bleep) fogs the mind when you should be paying attention and be swept into the illusion."

So, his mind is so locked in a one-way-or-no-way mentality that he cannot divorce a performance from the performer. That's bordering on hatred.
 
I said those who happen to be conservative--(not your "in general")--a minority in the majority liberal entertainment business, and one often ridiculed for whatever position they hold. In some cases, its gone beyond mere position, as revealed by Ben Affleck (in 2014) when he said.

So, his mind is so locked in a one-way-or-no-way mentality that he cannot divorce a performance from the performer. That's bordering on hatred.
Yes, I'm aware of what YOU said, but that was not what I had been discussing previously, which was the hypocrisy of Republicans/conservatives saying celebrities should not get involved in politics and then turning around and consistently voting celebrities into political office. You're arguing something completely different.
 
This thread needs some Patrick Stewart fun. :biggrin:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Shaz ‏ @sharonmar3 Mar 8
When your dog looks like Patrick Stewart

C6bwL07WgAAHcci.jpg
 
The same can be said--with ease--about Democrats; they habitually blast / attempt to ridicule any entertainer who happens to be conservative, right down to the long dried up Hitler comparisons in some cases.

To be fair here I've heard little or no bad things being said about conservative and libertarian actors like Kurt Russell and Kelsey Grammer, and "notorious" libertarian comedian, actor and gameshow host Drew Carey seems to have a career that's chugging along just fine. Bruce Willis is supposedly a huge prick on movie sets and some people in the industry are wary of him, but that's not because he has a long history of voting Republican and supporting conservative-leaning candidates but because he can be a smug asshole who bosses directors and fellow actors around like he's the most or only important guy in the film.

If you make Hollywood money and your films and TV shows are popular the industry doesn't care nearly as much as you seem to believe they do. Are center-left or avowedly leftist actors the prevailing creature in the entertainment industry? Sure. Does that mean the industry goes out of its way to demean or destroy conservative actors, singers and musicians? Not based on most of what I've seen.

Ask Jon Voight if he cares or is in fear for his career. Or Arnold Schwarzenegger. That man has been (until now) a pretty close pal of every Republican President going back to Reagan, served almost eight years as Governor of the nation's richest and most populous state and is one of the biggest moneymaking draws in the history of cinema. He's also a Republican, albeit a more liberal one. Nobody ran him out of the business because he used to hang out with the Bush family and was cozy with Ronald Reagan.

Who was also a Hollywood actor.
 
To be fair here I've heard little or no bad things being said about conservative and libertarian actors like Kurt Russell and Kelsey Grammer, and "notorious" libertarian comedian, actor and gameshow host Drew Carey seems to have a career that's chugging along just fine. Bruce Willis is supposedly a huge prick on movie sets and some people in the industry are wary of him, but that's not because he has a long history of voting Republican and supporting conservative-leaning candidates but because he can be a smug asshole who bosses directors and fellow actors around like he's the most or only important guy in the film.

All that sounds right except Grammer: he's a pretty notorious asshole.
 
I am ROFLOL at the idea that a cabinet of billionaires giving a squat about the white working class poor or anyone that is poor and economically deprived. How do you think some of them made their money? By only buying American goods and using American labour and paying decent wages? LOL
You think Trump and his crew are poachers turned gamekeepers??
 
Last edited:
Nice to see Sir Patrick intends to become an American by going through the legal immigration process, instead of "becoming an American" by overstaying his visa or illegally crossing one of the borders.

The top tax bracket in the UK (iirc) is 45%, President Trump's proposed top bracket is 33%.

Maybe this is the real reason Stewart want to be a citizen here? So he can hang onto more of his own money under Trump.

Anyone know if Patrick intends to have dual citizenship?
If Sir Patrick has a good accountant (and he can afford one) he won't be paying 45%. Rich people do not pay the high rate of taxes, if they did tax accountants would be unemployed.
 
Last edited:
There is a limit to the amount of immigrants our country can absorb. Waiting in line for decades is unfortunate, but it is not the United States responsibility to absorb every immigrant who wants to come here. This is reality - some will not make it to our shores.

The USA is one of the most least densely populated nations on the planet.
Out of 242 nations/regions, the U.K is number 50, the USA is not even in the top 100, you are 176 out of 242. You have the space.
(I bet my indigenous ancestors wished they had an immigration policy in the 17th century...)
 
Last edited:
The USA is one of the most least densely populated nations on the planet.
Out of 242 nations/regions, the U.K is number 50, the USA is not even in the top 100, you are 176 our 242. You have the space.
(I bet my indigenous ancestors wished they had an immigration policy in the 17th century...)
We may have the space. We also undoubtedly have the right to control our borders. IMHO a borderless world does not work here in the early 21st century.
 
We may have the space. We also undoubtedly have the right to control our borders. IMHO a borderless world does not work here in the early 21st century.
Your argument was based on space and resource limits, not rights, which is why she countered with the rebuttal she did.

"There is a limit to the amount of immigrants our country can absorb."

Remember when you said that? Then all of a sudden when she discredited the space issue you switched to a rights-based "borderless world" argument that no one was either advancing or arguing in favor of.

"We may have the space. We also undoubtedly have the right to control our borders. IMHO a borderless world does not work here in the early 21st century."

That's what's called a strawman argument.
 
We're nowhere near a borderless world, and yet there's a vast array of options between "no borders" and "keep absolutely everyone else out."

Let's not pretend a phrase like "secure the border" means anything specific--it is a right-wing dogwhistle for "let's persecute foreigners and anyone who might be mistaken for one."
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top