In Space no one can hear you navy.If the OP is bowing out of the thread, maybe he wouldn't mind if I renamed it...?
Starfleet Is a Spaaaaace Navy
I've been itching to do that.
In Space no one can hear you navy.If the OP is bowing out of the thread, maybe he wouldn't mind if I renamed it...?
Starfleet Is a Spaaaaace Navy
I've been itching to do that.
While some retcon is probably unavoidable, I prefer to at least try to find a explanation for differences.Yeah it's easy to rationalize the various changes the show runners made as the show developed
That's part of the fun.While some retcon is probably unavoidable, I prefer to at least try to find a explanation for differences.
No, they just require proper context, which in turn requires a nuanced approach to the issues that takes all the factors into account. To wit: that Starfleet is a paramilitary exploration service developed over time from an overtly non-military space program of the 22nd century; said program vastly under-estimated the threat environment they were moving into, and their early exploration vessels -- armed and equipped only for basic low-intensity law enforcement -- were constantly finding themselves outgunned by pirates and criminals all across the galaxy; that this exploration program eventually developed combat capabilities that were ALMOST competitive with other planets' militaries, and in so doing gained a reputation for being formidable opponents even when they were outgunned (which they almost always were anyway); that this reputation earned Starfleet special status in the Coalition of Planets and later in the Federation, as many other worlds liked the idea of a non-military armed force representing them in all foreign dealings and liked the idea of Earth not being able to lord it over them even more...But it is a ship that engages in war, and was designed with weapons.
The four character's statements are therefor strange.
Well, it's a case of a non-military organization explaining to OTHER people what their ship does and what Starfleet really is.It's not just a case of a military organization that doesn't describe itself using the term "military," It's people who don't seemingly understand what their own ship does.
This describes the TOS Starfleet perfectly, IMO. I always figured everyone in the yellow shirts were assigned to Starfleet from an active duty military service (probably the same service Garth used to serve in; Earth Space Defense Command maybe?) while the red shirts were drawn from a combination of law enforcement agencies and other non-military government employees. Only the blue shirts would have been actual civilians in this schema: doctors, researchers, scientists, botanists, etc. This would have made Starfleet a "combined service" that includes elements of military and non-military personnel, just like NASA.Agreed.
Which is why I've been pushing the "Starfleet is a goverment agency" line, as this would allow it to "not a military" as a whole (validating Picard, Scotty et al's comments) but also allow for it to contain military elements to fulfill it's defensive role.
A possible model would be the US Department of Homeland Security which includes a de facto military (USCG), law enforcement (ICE, USSS, CBP, TSA) and disaster/medical relief (FEMA, OHA) and even R & D (S&T).
Not the full range of SF activities, but a merger of DHS and State would probably cover 80 to 90%.
Thoughts?
Picard's quote to Ro Laren in "Preemptive Strike":
"We're committed to this mission. My only question for you is, can you carry out your orders? I could put you before a board of inquiry for having lied to me about this operation. I would certainly have you court-martialled if you sabotage it. Now, it's your decision."
Now ask some random non-Trekkie people if they think those lines were spoken by:
a) A military (or intelligence) officer.
b) An explorer.
c) A scientist.
d) A diplomat.
Then peace is a really crappy idea.
Again, context is important. Because whatever people might THINK those lines mean, they're being spoken by a man who is an explorer and a scientist and is, by his own words, not a military officer. The context in this case is "Starfleet" and the sentence "Starfleet is not a military organization"Picard's quote to Ro Laren in "Preemptive Strike":
"We're committed to this mission. My only question for you is, can you carry out your orders? I could put you before a board of inquiry for having lied to me about this operation. I would certainly have you court-martialled if you sabotage it. Now, it's your decision."
Now ask some random non-Trekkie people if they think those lines were spoken by:
a) A military (or intelligence) officer.
b) An explorer.
c) A scientist.
d) A diplomat.
The military organization that is Starfleet in not referred to as a military organizatin, but is in fact a military organization."Starfleet is not a military organization"
A hospital is not a hospital, its just a place sick humans attend for repair and maintenance. The staff are really explorers of the human bodyThe military organization that is Starfleet in not referred to as a military organizatin, but is in fact a military organization.
Fixed it for you.A hospital is not a police station, its purpose is to heal the sick. The staff only detain people forcibly when they are dangerous to themselves or others
It's not a military organization. If it was, they would call it one.The military organization that is Starfleet in not referred to as a military organizatin...
Fixed it backFixed it for you.
You kinda DIDN'T. The analogy doesn't actually work since the quote "the military is not a military organization" isn't something you find in Star Trek. That's an illogical comparison.Fixed it back
Picard's quote to Ro Laren in "Preemptive Strike":
"We're committed to this mission. My only question for you is, can you carry out your orders? I could put you before a board of inquiry for having lied to me about this operation. I would certainly have you court-martialled if you sabotage it. Now, it's your decision."
Now ask some random non-Trekkie people if they think those lines were spoken by:
a) A military (or intelligence) officer.
b) An explorer.
c) A scientist.
d) A diplomat.
If Starfleet actually was legally prohibited from starting a war and at least most of its officers abhorred the idea of doing so, I guess that would be a semantic distinction but also a substantial distinction and would make it a very unique type of military, one a lot of people in-universe (both in and out of the Federation) would consider to not be a military, closer to something else (even if instead the similar defensive forces).
You'd then have to lump in NOAA, CDC, NASA, the European Space Agency, ROSCOSMOS, and the list would just become endless. Which is why I don't like using 21st Century institutions as comparisons, because it ends up feeling rather forced.
Starfleet is a government agency, a space service, a space agency, star service, etc. etc. etc.
Until there is a war, then exploration takes a back seat very quickly. When the Jem Hader are shooting at you, star mapping can go hang .
It is concerning that it has both law enforcement and military capabilities, is it not?It's not a military organization. If it was, they would call it one.
It's an exploration fleet with law enforcement and military capabilities. It's ALWAYS been that, even when its status as a non-military agency was far from ambiguous.
So, do you agree that "Starfleet is a (multi-role) government agency" is a viable description or not?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.