I heard the 'kiss' was in Coda. I think it was a fan thing that got out of hand.
Well, he "kissed" her at 1:22 ...or sort of

(ok, it was very short AND to resuscitate her but it was better than nothing, wasn't it?!

I heard the 'kiss' was in Coda. I think it was a fan thing that got out of hand.
Let me make sure I understood you. Were you asking if she allowed what happened in her own personal life influence her view of what was 'best' for Kathryn's path?OK,. how about this:
If Kate had not been married to a career politician, at the time, would she have been more amenable to Janeway's having boyfriends - regardless if it were Chakotay, or not? I'm not so sure I buy this business about wanting Janeway to be chaste as a good example to the crew, or some shit. However you want to spin it, that excuse rings hollow. Had Kate been single, or with an Actor or whatever else, then Kathryn would've had a STAR TREKKIAN love-life, like all the rest.
Not that, really ... it's more the idea that Kate might've felt that keeping Janeway unattached and uninvolved would've kept both her and Mulgrew out of the tabloids, and thus, not affect her personally, or the career of her husband. For example, in an election, whilst slinging mud as politicians just LOVE to do, such tabloid fodder could potentially be used to make Kate's husband look foolish, perhaps being referenced in ads, some way. If Janeway's only about the job of being a Captain, she's not an embarrassment, no matter what she does. Hurl her crew to the furthest reaches of the Galaxy, never to get home. Kill Tuvix. Voluntarily become a Borg ... it's all just a day's work and wholesome entertainment, besides.Let me make sure I understood you. Were you asking if she allowed what happened in her own personal life influence her view of what was 'best' for Kathryn's path?
Understandable from a human cultural perspective but considering other non human cultural rules might be different about such things. Starfleet, if it still has a Terrancentric fraternisation rule in the 23rd and 24th century should not be sending out ships with mainly single human beings on 5 year missions. Plus Picard broke that silly rule in 'Lessons' for about 5 minutes .From a character point of view, it would make sense for a captain to choose not to be involved with someone under their command. It happened with Picard. Janeway made it clear many times, not just with Chakotay, that she would NOT be involved with someone under her command.
I really don't think it's an actual written rule.Understandable from a human cultural perspective but considering other non human cultural rules might be different about such things. Starfleet, if it still has a Terrancentric fraternisation rule in the 23rd and 24th century should not be sending out ships with mainly single human beings on 5 year missions. Plus Picard broke that silly rule in 'Lessons' for about 5 minutes .
Understandable from a human cultural perspective but considering other non human cultural rules might be different about such things.
Well the novels did do thatI'm confident that those in favour of a Chakotay/Janeway relationship, who were working on the show would find some way, some reason to get them together, had Kate Mulgrew been keen. Trekkies would've been tolerant of it, even if the "Chain of Command" aspect had been completely glossed over. Just show the Captain squeezing on her Number One and kissing him up, and it's all good. Leave it for some STAR TREK novel or comic book, or Fan Site to work out every detail of how & why it became permissible.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.