I don't like the reboots. I want to say before I continue that if you do like them I am not attacking your taste in movies, I just speak for myself and dislike the whole "not real Star Trek" garbage as much as anyone. A person could make a case that there was no new Star Trek since 1967, 1968, 1974, 1991, or even 1994, depends on your attitude and how close minded and stubborn you are I guess.
I want to say one of the main reasons I didn't like the reboots it completely closes the door on what we now retronym the "Prime Universe" I'm talking about future movies or shows, not novels or other media. I doubt they would ever go back, period. It's something of a final death, unlike Kirk's mostly death in STiD. Miracle Bones can't fix this one. And that's not even the reboot itself, just it's existence has a mark against it for me.
Now, if I actually enjoyed the resulting reboot, that could have been just ignored, I can ignore myself as well as I can ignore anyone else. Sometimes I don't even tell myself what I'm thinking.
My next problem was the whole assembling the crew shtick which I greatly disliked from TMP, but at least that had some logical progression to it. This one is just willy nilly scenes to get everyone on the ship. If the first scene of ST09 was Chris Pine narrating a Captain's log on the way to investigate the strange ion storm picked up on their sensors it would have improved dramatically for me. Who the hell wouldn't know who any of these people were? and then for those special people also couldn't find someone that does know to tell them? I can see that if it was a whole new property, but it's not. That's the point of updating a pre existing IP, its has built in recognition.
There's lots more I can complain about from the pacing to the art direction but I think if it was just the Enterprise with the crew and were somewhere in the timeframe of the 5 year mission without any alternate universe stuff at all, it would have been much better. So what no one mentioned this adventure subsequently? There's tons of Star Trek things that no one ever mentions again. All of those nice TOS setting novels I've read never interfered with the shows, why would this? If Pine was just Kirk and not AltKirk or NuKirk I would have felt much better.
What do you think Sir BillJ? I know we like to go around on this.