• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Axanar dropped a plot spoiler about a month ago

"Fanwank" or "fap fap fap" is just trolling. It's insulting and demeaning to the people who do enjoy seeing how events interconnect.
Fan films and fan fiction are fanwank just by their very existence. Makes no difference if it's Star Trek, Star Wars, talking ponies, or comic book superheroes.
 
In point of fact, many of the moderators frown upon public posts accusing others of trolling. If there's a problem, that's what the shiny
report.gif
button is for. I'm not here for fights, but we can disagree without making it personal.
 
Hi guys,

I'm not a tech guy so if someone can tell me how to "tag" what might be a spolier, I'd be happy to do that. And I'm not trying to be cagey. It's just that this particular detail of the story/script is something I wish I did not know, and I suspect you will enjoy Axanar even more if you did noy know it in advance.

Best Regards,
Duane Bruner
 
Not sure what you are trying to get at with your link since it has no relevant canon information.

Er, it has nothing but "canon" information, and then a subsection with some hypothetical stuff on The Four Years War from FASA.


Nothing in Errand of Mercy prohibits a Four Years War with the Klingons previously. The only thing EoM says is that the Federation and the Klingons are currently not in open conflict.

Indeed. The "current" situation between the Klingons and Feds in the 2260s may not have been the nature of relations in the 2240s.

Always bummed me out that the Klingons were introduced so soon in Enterprise. It would have been great to have that first contact happen a little later and included all the "disaster" of Picard's remarks from TNG.
 
Hi guys,

I'm not a tech guy so if someone can tell me how to "tag" what might be a spolier, I'd be happy to do that. And I'm not trying to be cagey. It's just that this particular detail of the story/script is something I wish I did not know, and I suspect you will enjoy Axanar even more if you did noy know it in advance.

Best Regards,
Duane Bruner

Click REPLY to a post. On the Reply to Thread screen, amongst the icons where you type your message is one that looks like this:
spoiler.gif
That's the SPOILER tag button.

To use it, type out your message, then highlight the portion which contains the spoilers. Now click the
spoiler.gif
. A dialog box will appear, prompting you to "Please enter the option for your
tag:" which means what appears on the spoiler tag in the message. For instance, I'm going to write a spoiler about Citizen Kane below, and the "option" text will be "WTF Rosebud means"

In Citizen Kane the MacGuffin concerns "Rosebud", which ends up being revealed to be
merely a sled from Kane's boyhood.

See?
 
Last edited:
Hi guys,

I'm not a tech guy so if someone can tell me how to "tag" what might be a spolier, I'd be happy to do that. And I'm not trying to be cagey. It's just that this particular detail of the story/script is something I wish I did not know, and I suspect you will enjoy Axanar even more if you did noy know it in advance.

Best Regards,
Duane Bruner

Click REPLY to a post. On the Reply to Thread screen, amongst the icons where you type your message is one that looks like this:
spoiler.gif
That's the SPOILER tag button.

To use it, type out your message, then highlight the portion which contains the spoilers. Now click the
spoiler.gif
. A dialog box will appear, prompting you to "Please enter the option for your
tag:" which means what appears on the spoiler tag in the message. For instance, I'm going to write a spoiler about Citizen Kane below, and the "option" text will be "WTF Rosebud means"

In Citizen Kane the MacGuffin concerns "Rosebud", which ends up being revealed to be
merely a sled from Kane's boyhood.

See?
 
I read all the blurbs there about the characters. I of course reserve the right to wait and see the final film how they are all presented, but these blurbs tell me very little about who these characters are or what their personalities or motivations might be; that page is just a list of cardboard-cutout stats and tidbits, with just a twinge of Mary-Sue-ing up Garth thrown in from the other characters' descriptions.

I know it's just a fan film, but I sincerely hope the final script/film/presentation of these characters is more nuanced and dynamic.
 
So Garth's plan might be the same as The Emperor's plan in Jedi? Leak to the enemy where you're building your Death Star / Constitution Class Ship. Klingon's / Rebels commit everything to a final attack only to find a fully functional Battle Station / Eneterprise. It's a Trap! will be yeeled by Karn.
 
My take was
They were being built at Earth, and the Klingons would simply be warping into a combat ready flotilla of Ares and other class vessels.
 
just a twinge of Mary-Sue-ing up Garth thrown in from the other characters' descriptions.

I call "foul". The idea that Garth is a legendary officer is 100% canon. Even The Kirk admired him greatly.

So Garth's plan might be the same as The Emperor's plan in Jedi? Leak to the enemy where you're building your Death Star / Constitution Class Ship. Klingon's / Rebels commit everything to a final attack only to find a fully functional Battle Station / Eneterprise. It's a Trap! will be yeeled by Karn.

I said as much a page or so back. :)

My take was
They were being built at Earth, and the Klingons would simply be warping into a combat ready flotilla of Ares and other class vessels.

Except that doesn't work out. With the D-7s now in the war, they already said in Prelude that they would get their chronmeters cleaned by the Klingons, even with the Ares class. Soat least one Connie (probably Enterprise) is more than likely to show up at Axanar.
 
Last edited:
just a twinge of Mary-Sue-ing up Garth thrown in from the other characters' descriptions.

I call "foul". The idea that Garth is a legendary officer is 100% canon. Even The Kirk admired him greatly.


I never disputed Garth's being legendary.

I just said I thought it was shoddy writing (at this stage) to base the characterization of every single other Starfleet character on it. Nothing in those blurbs tells us, really, anything other than the fact that they all look up to and respect Garth.

I also allowed for the possibility that it's just the blurbs on the website that were poorly written. I'm keeping an open mind about it all, but the website descriptions are discouraging.
 
These aren't military secrets. It's a fan film.
:lol: Some people are really proud of their shit. Like the purchase verification people at the exits of the big warehouse stores like Costco and Sam's Club, who act like they're guarding the bloody Pentagon!
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top