If you were talking about DS9's anniversary I would understand, however, I don't see how the Franchise's/TOS' anniversary factors into it.
People are going to take far more notice of the franchises 50th anniversary than one of the spinoffs 25th.
If I remember correctly the previous Blu Ray releases were connected with their respective series' anniversary.
DS9 HD in 2018?
Star Trek season one released in early in 2009 on Blu-ray. The episodes started airing in 2006 in syndication. With Toshiba underwriting part of the project so it could do an HD-DVD version. Only season one was released in HD-DVD in late-2007.
It's a discussion board. Some folks are simply more realistic than others.
Yeah, yeah, I know, DS9 on Blu Ray probably won't happen, but it seems some people here get a perverse pleasure reminding the rest of us of that.
No 'perverse pleasure'. Whatever my personal thoughts on DS9 are, I believe it is best to get these episodes upgraded to HD (as well as
Voyager). Even if it's just for the fans.
But, for the time being, CBS has decided the economics don't work.
From what I understand, some of these folks don't even like DS9, which makes me wonder why they lurk around...
I own the show on DVD and watch from time to time on Netflix.
As you said, TOS remastered started in 2006. That's the 40th anniversary.
And while I agree that the Franchise's anniversary attracts more attention than a spinoff's one, it still doesn't mean that it matters much.
As you say, if the economics where there, it would come out whenever.
On the other hand, if you're going to bother tying it with an anniversary, it would make more sense to do with the specific anniversary.
I know this a discussion board, and I'm not saying that only people who think alike should be allowed to discuss, but certain behaviours just seem odd and borderline provocative.
I'm not speaking specifically about you because, frankly, I don't even remember who had such behaviours, this thread has been going on for so long.
On the topic of being realist, some people here have said that it will
never happen.
That's not realism, it's full blown pessimism.
On the other hand, acknowledging that probably it won't happen, but still hoping for it, is hardly a case of unsubstantiated optimism.
That would be the case of being (nearly) certain that it will happen. Which I think few, if any, people said here.
If they have, then yes, I agree with you, such people aren't being realistic.