• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Yes, another TOS Constitution reboot

What is your favorite Enterprise?

  • NX-01

  • 1701

  • 1701-A

  • 1701-B

  • 1701-C

  • 1701-D

  • 1701-E

  • 1701-F

  • 1701 (Kelvin timeline)

  • 1701 (Discovery retcon)

  • 1701-J

  • 1701-A (Kelvin timeline)

  • 1701-G


Results are only viewable after voting.
New name, same great work. :mallory:

Guess you can't just add licence plate illumination like on cars for the registry I think? :angel:(and yeah, I know, that probably would look hiddious.. )
 
@Hunter-GKirk's Enterprise had dialogue that indicated she had weapons on the sides, midships and aft so she was pretty well covered. But generally the Enterprise was maneuverable enough to engage primarily with her forward weapons (and because they only made stock video of firing forward :D ).

Don't the Franz Joseph blueprints show forward phasers on the front ventral saucer, port and starboard phasers on the dorsal saucer, and after phasers above the shuttlebay? (My set are packed away in a box in storage because I just moved house, so I can't check.) I think the only real weapons blind spot the Constitution-class had was no aft-firing torpedoes, which is a less significant issue when the torpedoes are self-guided.
 
Don't the Franz Joseph blueprints show forward phasers on the front ventral saucer, port and starboard phasers on the dorsal saucer, and after phasers above the shuttlebay? (My set are packed away in a box in storage because I just moved house, so I can't check.) I think the only real weapons blind spot the Constitution-class had was no aft-firing torpedoes, which is a less significant issue when the torpedoes are self-guided.

Yeah I have FJ's blueprints but they don't match up on onscreen dialogue or FX so I didn't include those locations in my reply. FJ's plans lack the midship and aft weapons and puts the torp launchers in the teardrop instead of the ventral saucer.
 
Yeah I have FJ's blueprints but they don't match up on onscreen dialogue or FX so I didn't include those locations in my reply.

To be fair, from the efforts I've seen around TrekBBS and elsewhere, making an entirely screen-accurate blueprints of the Enterprise based purely on what we seen on screen is impossible... ;)
 
Yeah in order for an actual accurate build you would need the blueprints, studio model, and everything said in the show to match up exactly. So really it's a choice between which source to use haha
 
I can see what @Professor Moriarty is saying but it does look pretty neat. Other options to trace the lighting like a led strip around the letters or maybe a light projector near the hull?

@Hunter-G (did you change your screen name?) I love the idea of the registry characters being outlined with lights… it’s a very US Navy thing to do, but the relatively teeny tiny pinpricks of light cast by the projectors will also have the welcome side-effect of adding a subtle hint of scale to your model.

(Edited to add example of an attempt that I made to do this a while back...)

View attachment 27030

View attachment 27034

View attachment 27035

That does look similar to what I might do, we'll see. Here a second texture test, closer, but not quite there yet:
9T3T9ol.png


And yes, I changed my username to match the other sites I'm on
 
Last edited:
Really diggin' the "little" details you're putting on the hull (but in this context, "little" details are the size of my condo).
Guess you can't just add licence plate illumination like on cars for the registry I think? :angel:(and yeah, I know, that probably would look hiddious.. )
Why not? It's exactly what the model makers did for the starships in the 2009 movie. Personally, I prefer the array of smaller lights used to light up the Kelvin and Enterprise registries; it somehow seems more realistic than the broad conical beams of light used to illuminate the refit Enterprise in Star Trek: The Motion Picture. (But having said that, I am practically VIBRATING with anticipation for the 4K HDR release of TMP on Tuesday! Squeeeee!!!)
 
That's what got me about the original ship, it only ever had those two phasers and forward torpedoes. To kid me, I wondered if a ship came up behind them if the Enterprise could ever fire aft because there were no phaser banks there until TMP.
I think I recall one episode where aft phasers were used, but I just can't remember the exact episode.
 
I think I recall one episode where aft phasers were used, but I just can't remember the exact episode.
The "Enterprise" Mirror Universe episode "In a Mirror Darkly" showed that on the TOS Defiant. As it was escaping from the dry docks at least, maybe once more?

But that's years after TOS, which never showed rear phasers in use, but you CAN hear a background line in the bridge status chatter saying "aft phaser to bridge"! That's heard in many TOS episodes. :)
 
The "Enterprise" Mirror Universe episode "In a Mirror Darkly" showed that on the TOS Defiant. As it was escaping from the dry docks at least, maybe once more?

We see the Defiant firing aft phasers from two emitters on either side of the dome above its shuttlebay as it escapes the Tholian dry dock...

N7j2d0h.gif


We also see it firing aft photon torpedoes from a similar position, possibly the dome itself...

O7sHhkf.gif


Later, it destroys an NX-class ship with the aft phasers...

3QrQv20.gif
 
If I'm not mistaken, the aft torpedo launcher is in a hole in the middle of the impulse drive.

I'm sure that's been labelled on some interpretations of the Constitution-class, but it's definitely not the case with the Defiant.
 
We see the Defiant firing aft phasers from two emitters on either side of the dome above its shuttlebay as it escapes the Tholian dry dock...

N7j2d0h.gif


We also see it firing aft photon torpedoes from a similar position, possibly the dome itself...

O7sHhkf.gif


Later, it destroys an NX-class ship with the aft phasers...

3QrQv20.gif

Mesmerizing!
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top