Spoilers Yeah... I give up - Star Trek has abandoned philosophical naturalism - it's depressing/juvenile

Discussion in 'Star Trek: Discovery' started by INACTIVEUSS Einstein, Jan 22, 2018.

  1. Vger23

    Vger23 Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2014
    Location:
    Enterprise bowling alley
    I've come to realize that I love different things about Star Trek than most of the common fans love.

    1. ("Depressing?") I like the darker, more serious tonality at times. I like TNG Conspiracy and Yesterday's Enterprise. I like TWOK. I like DS9's Dominion arc. I'm watching VOY right now, mostly for the first time, and while I don't find it objectionable, I also find nothing particularly engaging or dramatic about it. Its simply The Orville without gloryhole jokes. In fact, it's amazing (given that I'm watching both simultaneously,) and it's uncanny how much the two shows are alike. The Orville could easily be VOY season 8. Not to say either are bad...not at all...just nothing I'd be passionate about.

    2. ("Juvenile?") I like the over-the-top comic book-like tone. The camp, if you will. I don't know how anyone can be a fan of TOS or TWOK, for example, and not adore the fun scenery chewing and bombastic style Trek offers at times. I think Trek got very self-conscious and conservative in the 90s and it was good, but not as fun. It's also one of the reasons I love S3 of TOS. Let's be ridiculous and hammy and have some balls-out fun sometimes.

    For my tastes, DSC weirdly balances both these things perfectly. Others hate this and long for the more muted and conservative format. I don't begrudge anyone that opinion...but that's not for me.

    I guess I'm saying that I like DSC for all the things other people hate it for.
     
    Last edited: Jan 28, 2018
    Pauln6 and EnderAKH like this.
  2. fireproof78

    fireproof78 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2014
    Location:
    Journeying onwards
    As I age, I find different things I like. Nothing will replace TOS in terms of designs, characters or just overall sense of fun. DS9 and DISCO are definitely for the older me, the person who wants the complex characters, unresolved problems and season long arcs.

    If I want fluff and fun, then I'll watching something else. DISCO hits that note for me.
     
    Vger23 likes this.
  3. johnjm22

    johnjm22 Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2013
    Location:
    California
    Discovery is too juvenile and immature for me. I would prefer something more mature.

    You can be mature and still have some camp/silliness. It just depends on how you go about it.
     
    Bgt, Mad Jack Wolfe and Serveaux like this.
  4. fireproof78

    fireproof78 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2014
    Location:
    Journeying onwards
    But the rest of Star Trek is ok? O_o

    Broadly, this is something I don't get. DISCO gets panned for doing things that other Star Trek's have done. Is it just the way that's done? It is the characters? Is it the novelty of the show? What is it about DISCO that makes it worth dismissing out of hand? :shrug::shrug::shrug:
     
    shapeshifter, Butters and Vger23 like this.
  5. Serveaux

    Serveaux Fleet Admiral Premium Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2013
    Location:
    Among the sellers.
    The SO and I just watched a "juvenile" Disney feature from about a decade ago that was more stylish, professionally produced and written than Discovery. Had more fun with the whole space travel thing, too.

    Space travel can be kind of awesome in the movies. No one on Discovery knows that. :lol:
     
  6. gamer1

    gamer1 Lieutenant Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2016
    This all reminds me of those guys shouting how the new Star Wars movies ruined their childhood. Maybe it's time to accept something else then a crew, 1 member of the crew is the "alien outsider". Ridged forehead alien of the week, and some social (usually left leaning liberal) moral cookie of the week.If Star Trek didn't evolve it would really die. The new movies are horrible. Discovery *IS* Star Trek, even old Star Trek but it is a product that will actually garner interest in todays society.

    Doesn't the old "formula" get old?
     
  7. johnjm22

    johnjm22 Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2013
    Location:
    California
    What do you mean?

    I'm not saying there isn't immature stuff in other Trek. I'm just saying Discovery as a whole is very childish in the way it's written. There's a difference between being consciously cornball, and unintentionally cornball. Discovery is the latter.
     
    Bgt likes this.
  8. fireproof78

    fireproof78 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2014
    Location:
    Journeying onwards
    That Star Trek has done it before, consciously and unconsciously. I'm glad people are posting TNG quotes because I feel like Abrams Trek and DISCO get taken to task for things that are taken for granted in other Treks.
     
  9. Serveaux

    Serveaux Fleet Admiral Premium Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2013
    Location:
    Among the sellers.
    Sure.

    That's not a valid defense of Discovery. "That stuff you like isn't so good" doesn't make this show good. It's not.
     
  10. fireproof78

    fireproof78 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2014
    Location:
    Journeying onwards
    Doesn't make it bad either. It sits just as well with my other Trek.
     
  11. gamer1

    gamer1 Lieutenant Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2016
    It's a very valid defense. Discovery is Star Trek for the masses of 2018, whereas old Star Trek (which I never said was bad) simply won't work today. I love old Star Trek but comparing it to Discovery makes it cringe worthy.
     
  12. Serveaux

    Serveaux Fleet Admiral Premium Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2013
    Location:
    Among the sellers.
    It's not.

    The masses don't care and don't watch it. Trekkies do.
     
    Maurice and Mad Jack Wolfe like this.
  13. Vger23

    Vger23 Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2014
    Location:
    Enterprise bowling alley
    No, you don't like it. That doesn't mean it isn't good. It simply means it's not aligned with your tastes and likings. Those are two very different things.

    You might actually have more productive and meaningful exchanges on this board if you could humble yourself enough to learn the difference.
     
  14. rahullak

    rahullak Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2009
    I meant it's not going to be exactly similar to what I expect or want. Sometimes it's easier to find things to enjoy and sometimes it's harder. If I wanted a show or a movie that I always enjoy to the fullest extent without any quibbles whatsoever, well then, I'd have to make my own show or movie. Which then others would find easier or harder to enjoy depending on what's in their heads.
     
  15. Donker

    Donker Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2018
    Why does Black Mirror work then?

    The fact is, old style Star Trek can work perfectly fine today, just CBS want the "walking dead" audience.
    I've always hated this idea that actual good sci-fi won't be popular, when films like The Martian or Arrival or Prometheus grossed more than the Kelvin films or shows like Black Mirror are vastly more popular than Discovery.

    As I will always say, if they don't want to make Star Trek. Why have they made a Star Trek TV series instead of just some original IP and if they don't want to follow continuity or the setting at all, why set it in the Prime verse? Hell why set it in a era already seen on screen?

    Discovery is a cynical cashgrab that is why. It's only called Star Trek because CBS will know people know the name. The reason it's set in the TOS era is so they can namedrop Spock and Kirk.

    Today also confirmed my suspect feeling that Fuller is one the reasons why Discovery doesn't really work. He apparently wanted to plop them in the Mirror Universe sooner than later. Another terrible Fuller idea.
    Honestly when I learned Fuller was behind that lame grimdark "The Federation has stagnated and collapsed" pitch years back, I knew he wasn't going to be a good fit for Trek.
     
    Mad Jack Wolfe likes this.
  16. Pauln6

    Pauln6 Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2009
    Location:
    Bristol, United Kingdom
    The first movie was too self indulgent. It's message was accidentally about the cult of celebrity. Kirk is charismatic and cool and that success is more important than the decisions taken to get there. Liberal common sense were the enemies of success and that is the opposite of Star Trek. Setting it side by side with the Doomsday Machine NuKirk makes very similar decisions to Decker.

    Discovery is pushing the envelope on Trek philosophy by placing its characters on the fringes. It's clever, even if I don't always 100% agree with the implementation. Trek09 and Into Darkness were not clever.
     
  17. Refuge

    Refuge Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2016
    Yes the rest of Star Trek is okay.
     
    Long Syntax likes this.
  18. Butters

    Butters Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2008
    Location:
    Elsewhere
    This thread still open?

    While I sip my Sunday morning organic coffee I thought I’d lookup the definitions of juvenile and depressing. They still mean what I through they meant, and the Atlantic language gap doesn’t make any difference, so I’m puzzelled as to how they can apply to Discovery.

    The show isn’t made for children, nor does seem to be made by children. I may have missed the cock and fart jokes though. Do we all shout ‘he’s behind you!’ when Voq appears?

    Depressing? Maybe more subjective, but it’s action drama, so it needs an element of peril. Hollyoaks is depressing, it’s full of teenagers upsetting each other, has angsty moody pop music, and every episode ends with one of the characters sobbing in a corner. This ain’t that.

    I’ll confess to not loving Discovery as much as I did TNG, but that’s probably because I’m thirty years older and I like different things now, but this is as much a Trek as any.

    I’ll concede Discovery is Juvenile when they have their Naked Time/Now moment. And I will be depressed if they hire a writer that doesn’t get evolution and spews out crap like Threshold or Genesis, and god forbid we ever the likes of Rascsals again.

    It’s an alright show, and considering the baggage of its legacy, it’s doing a good job of being fresh, inventive, and entertaining.

    Where it does suffer is being designed for, and delivered with, box set shows which compel binge watching, but that’s not possible because of the weekly wait.

    Still enjoying it though.
     
    Ovation and Vger23 like this.
  19. Refuge

    Refuge Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2016
    I'm not puzzled how someone could find Discovery is depressing and juvenile. It's dark and in the first few episodes we saw Georgiou killed, Michael stripped of rank, Landry killed, and then we found out the captain of Discovery was a war monger with some hidden agenda. Not exactly a laugh a minute. The mirror universe is not a hopeful world either. Tyler's story is a misery. Culber is dead. Michael ate some alien akin to Saru. Lorca in an agony machine and the silly antics of Emperor Georgiou and dingbat Captain Tilly.

    A dark joke right??
     
    Mad Jack Wolfe likes this.
  20. Agony_Boothb

    Agony_Boothb Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2009
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia
    I don't really see the issue with any of those things. Compared to most modern dramas Discovery is sunshine and rainbows. Thankfully we no longer have to deal with the pedestrian plots of Voyager which involved everything being resolved in 45 minutes only to be forgotten the next week.

    I assume you have watched episodes involving the mirror universe before right? They were filled with people being enslaved, and characters killing people that they were friends with in the prime universe. It wasn't exactly a positive place when depicted in TOS or DS9.