Yeah, I thought the same thing. All I could think was, "Can't be surely?!"Aaron Taylor Johnson tbh

Yeah, I thought the same thing. All I could think was, "Can't be surely?!"Aaron Taylor Johnson tbh
It featured clips from a lot of the previous X-movies, but were there any from Origins? I only recognized clips from X2 when Logan saw Styker.Yeah, even before the rewriting of time, I thought they were pretty much ignoring it. Stryker was much younger than as played by Danny Huston, Wolverine was bodyguarding in New York rather than fighting in Vietnam, Xavier wasn't yet bald, and couldn't walk and exercise psychic powers at the same time, like he could 5 years later in Origins.
None of which are entirely irreconcilable with the earlier movie, admittedly, but I did get the impression they were deliberately ignoring it.
I just found thisYeah, I thought the same thing. All I could think was, "Can't be surely?!"Aaron Taylor Johnson tbh
Ah ok.Simon Kinberg has been talking about the scene at the end of the credits in X-Men: Days of Future Past, confirming that the character glimpsed onscreen is indeed Apocalypse, but a younger version of the one that will appear in the next X-flick.
“The post-credit sequence is a tease into what will be the Apocalypse movie” he explained. “Now the Apocalypse you see – that young boy – may not be the actor who plays the character in our movie. It’s a deep back story glimpse into the character, but our movie doesn’t take place in ancient Egypt and will likely not star a young boy Apocalypse.”
Incidentally, when Wolverine woke up in the changed timeline at the end, when was that meant to be? At the same time as the nightmarish figure or circa X-Men 1-3?
^ No, IIRC, Xavier clearly wasn't waiting for him, he asked why he'd slept in for his class or something like that. It was only when Wolverine referred to not knowing much history after 1973 that Charles grasped what had happened.
My own instinct was that it happened in the equivalent timeframe to the future scenes during the rest of the movie (flying wheelchair for one thing) but Rogue, Scott and Jean seemed remarkably unaged. Must be those mutant genes!
AllStarEntprise said:Poor Origins though. The only X-Men film completely retconned away.
Ethros said:Yet I did notice at the end of the credits it listed all six previous movies (inc Origins) for using clips from.
AllStarEntprise said:Poor Origins though. The only X-Men film completely retconned away.
Not completely... he still has the bone claws!
Ethros said:Yet I did notice at the end of the credits it listed all six previous movies (inc Origins) for using clips from.
That's interesting. I wonder if they used something that was cut from the film or if it's the kind of thing you have to pause the DVD to even notice.
I honestly thought that Fox was going to use this film to fully retire some of the old cast in a nice way, and make it so that McAvoy and Fassbender would not only be able to continue playing those characters, but that they would somehow be moved into the contemporary time period
AllStarEntprise said:Poor Origins though. The only X-Men film completely retconned away.
Not completely... he still has the bone claws!
Ethros said:Yet I did notice at the end of the credits it listed all six previous movies (inc Origins) for using clips from.
That's interesting. I wonder if they used something that was cut from the film or if it's the kind of thing you have to pause the DVD to even notice.
Which is something ultimately from the comics so it doesn't actually require they acknowledge Origins.
Unless I missed it, I didn't like how there was no explanation about Kitty's new power of sending people into the past. I haven't read the comic, but I know she was the one who goes into the past. Is there some way the comic can explain this power?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.