Nope.
That is quite the take.No - not at all - So for example nothing in canon says Worf was Captain of the Enterprise-E.
That is quite the take.
The only facts which are canonical are that Worf's current rank is Captain and that he played a role in the Enterprise E's fate. Now, sure, Occam's Razor could suggest he was the Captain of the Enterprise E, but that is still just speculation rather than actually being canon.That is quite the take.
What in canon says he was? He was clearly involved in something on the Enterprise-E but they deliberately never state he was Captain to leave that open for another writer to go in another direction. See also that Picard was Captain of the USS Verity.
The audio logs put out by CBS in connection to the show unequivocally say he was. additionally Terry Matalas made it clear that Worf was Captain of the Enterprise. This isn’t a “I would like to see” or “If I could” moment. This is hard and fast.
https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Star_Trek:_Picard_Logs
So not on-screen and can be ignored.
If you want to disregard background info put out by CBS expressly to explain certain things you see in the show, then more power to you.
But it doesn’t change anything
TOS said World War III happened in the 90s, first contact said it happened around 2050. Which one wins?
This is actually what I was trying to address with this thread. Where do we draw the line?The audio logs put out by CBS in connection to the show unequivocally say he was. additionally Terry Matalas made it clear that Worf was Captain of the Enterprise. This isn’t a “I would like to see” or “If I could” moment. This is hard and fast.
https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Star_Trek:_Picard_Logs
This is actually what I was trying to address with this thread. Where do we draw the line?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.