The core principle that Wonder Woman was originally based upon was Loving Female Authority, a subset of Female Dominance, which is a subset of BDSM. Once you understand that, the early books looks very different, and very daring.
William and Elizabeth Marsden based the character, in part, on their bisexual live-in lover, Olive Byrne, with whom they engaged in various bondage activities, which are the source of Wonder Woman's powers and weaknesses.
William Matsden really believed that a strong, dominant, yet loving woman can make people better. Wonder Woman didn't just beat her villians up, and she didn't just force them to ehgage in oddly sexual romps through the forrest in fursuits, she actually rehabilitated them. She didn't do this be beating them into submission, but be showing them actual decent human kindness, in spite of her superiority to them, in spire of her victory over them, and they responded to it. Wonder Woman was a model for the compasionate law enforcement, and the compassionate rehabilitation of criminals, rather than punishment-based models of criminal justice.
After William Marston died, Wonder Woman lost her core identity. She was no longer a strong, loving, compassionate, self-empowered, dominate woman; she was just a woman with superpowers. Marston's replacements didn't understand the character, and the CCA made them tone down both the female empowerment angle and the BDSM element. The result was a shell of the true Wonder Woman, a giddy preening lovesick puppy.
She's improved over the years, but even with Gail Simone, an actual woman, writing her, she still doesn't have that subversive spark that Marston breathed into her, nor that unified ideal of compassionate rehabilitiation at the hands of a superior yet universally loving female master.
The core principle that Wonder Woman was originally based upon was Loving Female Authority, a subset of Female Dominance, which is a subset of BDSM. Once you understand that, the early books looks very different, and very daring.
William and Elizabeth Marsden based the character, in part, on their bisexual live-in lover, Olive Byrne, with whom they engaged in various bondage activities, which are the source of Wonder Woman's powers and weaknesses.
William Matsden really believed that a strong, dominant, yet loving woman can make people better. Wonder Woman didn't just beat her villains up, and she didn't just force them to engage in oddly sexual romps through the forest in fursuits, she actually rehabilitated them. She didn't do this be beating them into submission, but by showing them actual decent human kindness, in spite of her superiority to them, in spite of her victory over them, and they responded to it. Wonder Woman was a model for the compassionate law enforcement, and the compassionate rehabilitation of criminals, rather than punishment-based models of criminal justice.
After William Marston died, Wonder Woman lost her core identity. She was no longer a strong, loving, compassionate, self-empowered, dominate woman; she was just a woman with superpowers. Marston's replacements didn't understand the character, and the CCA made them tone down both the female empowerment angle and the BDSM element. The result was a shell of the true Wonder Woman, a giddy preening lovesick puppy.
She's improved over the years, but even with Gail Simone, an actual woman, writing her, she still doesn't have that subversive spark that Marston breathed into her, nor that unified ideal of compassionate rehabilitiation at the hands of a superior yet universally loving female master.
Undecided.
Just saw the Wonder Woman Blu-ray (liked it) and have read the last five issues of Gail Simone's Wonder Woman run which I'm finding just okay.
I have an odd relationship with this character. As part of the Justice League, and, particularly in stories featuring The Big Three, I think WW is a great character which keeps leading me time and time again to read the WW individual stories/books. But as the featured hero, I find with some infrequent, but notable exceptions - JLA League of One being one them - that Wonder Woman doesn't quite work for me. I find her Warrior/Peace Bearer stance a contradictory and clumsy mix. And her occasional musty 60s sounding Women Power! feminist language is cringe worthy. Additionally, the mythology that surrounds her is unrecognizable and odd (was that Zeus I saw in a spandex superhero one piece?), and it just becomes one more thing that makes the character difficult to accept.
I really want to like this character, but no writer - I include Perez's run which I read most of - can get it right. And that likely comes down to a basic flaw of the character who may not work this far removed from suffragette sensibilities.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.