Honestly, if they did the aforementioned movie, I would be completely okay with Sam getting the two of them home, and continuing on into another leap himself.
There was a running joke in fandom that when NCIS New Orleans ended they might have thrown in a little easter egg of blue lightning as the show ends but this was just very wishful thinking on the part of fans.
Every character Bakula has played is someone Sam leaped into. In fact Sam once leaped into Bakula.Someone should fan edit a leap that goes from the founding of the federation to the beginning of NCIS New Orleans.
He's still leaping as seen on the It's Always Sunny episode endingEvery character Bakula has played is someone Sam leaped into. In fact Sam once leaped into Bakula.![]()
He's still leaping as seen on the It's Always Sunny episode ending
Whose to say they will keep leaping together though. Once they finish that one leap we saw at the end he could find himself a Dentist in small town Iowa in 1985 while Addison is a Military General helping fight World War II in 1943.
It's an interesting question, though. I could imagine the writers coming up with a story where the force controlling the leaps adopts a divide-and-conquer principle: maybe the only way to achieve the desired change is for Ben and Addison to make different changes in different times, with the Project staff coordinating between them. Although I'm not sure the Imaging Chamber can be set up for two parallel communication streams. They might have to use Janis's bootleg chamber.
Wasn't that bartender the one that pulled Sam off course in his first leap?
No, that's what Sam suspected, but the bartender told him that Sam had been subconsciously guiding his own leaps the whole time. The whole point of the finale was that Sam consciously chose to go on leaping, that it was always up to him whether he got home or not, and he chose to prioritize helping others instead.
But that's not what I'm talking about. Who or what controls the leaps is irrelevant to the question, since that's just a MacGuffin to generate the episodic format of the show. I'm saying that if they'd gotten a third season with two simultaneous leapers, there are a number of interesting things they could've done with the idea, one of which is sending Ben and Addison to different times as aspects of the same Leap.
Indeed, the original show did something similar a few times, where Sam needed to leap into different people, or the same person at different times, to pull off the goal of the Leap. This way, they could have both Leapers working the problem at once.
No, that's what Sam suspected, but the bartender told him that Sam had been subconsciously guiding his own leaps the whole time. The whole point of the finale was that Sam consciously chose to go on leaping, that it was always up to him whether he got home or not, and he chose to prioritize helping others instead.
But that's not what I'm talking about. Who or what controls the leaps is irrelevant to the question, since that's just a MacGuffin to generate the episodic format of the show. I'm saying that if they'd gotten a third season with two simultaneous leapers, there are a number of interesting things they could've done with the idea, one of which is sending Ben and Addison to different times as aspects of the same Leap.
Indeed, the original show did something similar a few times, where Sam needed to leap into different people, or the same person at different times, to pull off the goal of the Leap. This way, they could have both Leapers working the problem at once.
I only watched the first season and half of the second. The show was never as good as the original. While the show modernized the social commentary, it wasted too much time on plot and left little room for character development like we saw with each leap in the original, where we’d spend a lot more time in the leap.Bakula wants to do it - he's just not going to be a background / guest character in his own show. They already pissed him off, and he told them to kick rocks. A movie where he saves Ben and Addy might give him enough material to work with.
I only watched the first season and half of the second. The show was never as good as the original. While the show modernized the social commentary, it wasted too much time on plot and left little room for character development like we saw with each leap in the original, where we’d spend a lot more time in the leap.
I don’t see Scott doing anything with it.
It didn’t really move the story along from the original. It hinted at it in the first half of season 1, but it dropped that story.
Sam was only in the pilot script for a single short scene. And he was "working with" Janis, so perhaps they simply folded whatever he was to contribute into what Janis said or did in the season.I do wonder what the original outline was and how much had to be rewritten when they realized they weren't getting Scott for anything. I got the impression that it didn't even cross their minds that he might refuse.
Sam was only in the pilot script for a single short scene. And he was "working with" Janis, so perhaps they simply folded whatever he was to contribute into what Janis said or did in the season.
Why “save Sam”? Seems pretty obvious in the original Sam is happy to keep leaping.The show should have just been Janis and Ben trying to save Sam. One of his leaps could have still been to save Addison.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.