^I must have missed the episdoe where they destroyed the Defiant along with an fleet.
Once and only once in the entire series is the Defiant that badly damaged. And it's all moot since they got a perfect replacement.
Didn't they start deveolping VOY around S6 of TNG? If so they had almost two years to develop it, how long did they need?
No, they started around the end of S7. Which means the show got like 1/4 the development time DS9 did.
Scorpion Part II not being as like as Part I, and how it's all seen as the start of the Borg's ruination.
And no one cared. Yet when VOY does the same thing everyone complains.
No one cared when Doctor Who did it, but if VOY does it suddenly it's bad.
And I doubt that "Descent" was better received than all of VOY Borg stories.
Like I said, if VOY had done the solar flare trick instead of the ENT-D you think anyone would enjoy that?
News of VOY arrival and there quest to get home could easily have preceded them as subspace communications are faster than Warp Drive. So you could have groups seeking out VOY to aid or hinder There is plenty that can be done with the concept should the will be there.
And yet when contact was re-established, it was just seen as another thing the show did wrong!
Yes, yes I do think people would have enjoyed it. Not only do I think that, but I read opinions of others who also think that. Not only that, but Descent was where the Borg started to get defanged, and then Unity happened and that was a disappointment, given the build up, and even the production staff admitted it! So, Scorpion was a better story, more interesting, and more personal, given the divide between Janeway and Chakotay. The disappointment came from the fact that they did not follow through on killing someone, as was indicated in Part 1, and a bit of a technobable solution to stopping 8472 and then stopping 7 of 9. Beyond that, nothing else had indicated that the episode was poorly received.
To be perfectly blunt, VOY had not earned the goodwill or confidence that TNG had or Doctor Who had through their longevity. Despite your insistence, DW has a much different flavor, much different tone and different base that VOY does, and is not really a good comparison for why people would like or dislike something.
As for TOS, TOS was something different for the time period, and was received differently by the audience of that time. If you take an episode of TOS and an episode of VOY and just mash them together for comparison, it's not going to be equal, given the different time period, cultural context, etc. that each show had. In all honesty, it's unfair to both shows.
As for aliens more powerful than the Borg,
none of those aliens ever faced the Borg or were demonstrated to go head to head against the Borg. So, no, the audience had not seen aliens that had defeated the Borg in open combat. The idea of all-powerful beings is interesting but won't be on my mind when a new alien in introduced.
I honestly don't think that more time would have helped VOY, because the flaws were more a part of the character development, and strength of the show at the time. As I said, VOY did not have consistency that would be expected from a show that had been going on for 3, going on 4 years, but was not quite there.
As Macleod pointed out, what audiences expect is not impacted by what studio execs order. VOY would not get a pass simply because of that. The lack of consistency and character growth does not inspire confidence, especially in a franchise that has been expected to produce good results.
Despite the arguments, I still find it lacking that the entire audience hated VOY simply because it tried something different. It just was a lack of follow through on the concept originally presented.