^ The remarkable thing with Mission: Impossible is it created a core cast of characters we really knew nothing about on a personal level for years, yet audiences still identified with them.
The first and fifth seasons did flesh out the core characters a bit, and there was the occasional special episode that gave one of the leads a romance or something, but yeah, for most of the series they deliberately kept the lead characters ciphers so that the focus could be on their assumed roles.
I would describe Quark right from the start as a main character and not a secondary. Later Garak given how much screen time he had was also a main character.DS9: Nog, Rom, Quark, Damar, Winn, Dukat, Gowron, Garak...yeah loads and loads.
I would describe Quark right from the start as a main character and not a secondary. Later Garak given how much screen time he had was also a main character.
I think a lot of that had disappeared by season two of TOS. The ship seemed less crowded and busy in the latter two seasons, with bridge crew making up most landing parties. Budget concerns more than likely was the cause. Not sure if there was a "palpable distinction between officers and men". Hard to make that distinction when there were no visible enlisted ranks. And many of the background extras had rank fluctuations along with department shifts.I'm thinking more in terms of the ways the writers and directors gave us a sense there was a bigger community on those ships, rather than necessarily a supporting cast, per se, and forgive me if this goes too far afield. TOS often showed crew running to and fro, had the captain concerned with keeping his crew abreast of their situation, and showed us that there were different departments manned by people we'd never seen before. Meyer captured that, too, in TWOK. There was a real sense of a crew aboard (and even a palpable distinction between officers and men). TNG had that for a while, but lost it after a few years. And let's not forget all those wonderful radio communications you could always hear in the background on the TOS bridge, with the various departments checking in and coordinating with each other.
While serving no doubt did inform them, it was twenty years in their pasts and not always in a service analogous to Starfleet. I know my father, who was active duty military in the 60s found much of Star Trek's "military" aspects humorous. (most military shows got the same reaction)Some noisy comments above notwithstanding, having served in the military DID give the creators of TOS the ability to bring a certain level of verisimilitude to ship's operations. Having neither served in the military nor even so much as watched TOS, Bermaga thought it was 7 guys in a single room pushing buttons. It never even occurred to them that there were phaser crews, torpedo crews, shuttle deck crews, or hell, any crew at all, unless a story called for a crewman. I'm not even convinced that Bermaga know that not every Federation citizen wears a Starfleet uniform.
Folks needed a scapegoat for what they didn't like in Modern Trek, which for a lot of the Old Guard was nearly everything. Ron Moore and Ira Behr also needed scapegoats and blame Berman for everything (though in their case they're really just being brats who didn't appreciate how easy they really had it in terms of production) so the fandom followed suit.
Folks dislike them because they need someone to dislike, not because they're actually responsible for what is disliked.
Its funny how you, who never worked on the show, seem to know who has what easy.
If this was one of the major things Berman and Behr clashed over, then Behr really DID have it majorly easy.This is nothing. Behr is just being a whiner, when he didn't even have it that bad.Berman was a BIG part of the problem. Ira Behr recalled him and Berman getting in to fierce arguments over elements of DS9. I specifically remember him telling the story about the fight he and Berman had over Nog losing a leg. Berman initially refused to let it happen saying that doing so was inappropriate and not something that should happen on Star Trek. Behr thought the whole argument was stupid. Given the state of Trek medicine it was obvious that Nog would be up walking again in no time….but Berman could not see that. In the end Behr won.
I would describe Quark right from the start as a main character and not a secondary. Later Garak given how much screen time he had was also a main character.
Unquestionably. Shimerman was a main-title regular from the get-go. Garak made one guest appearance in season 1 and then started showing up again occasionally from season 2 onward.
Folks needed a scapegoat for what they didn't like in Modern Trek, which for a lot of the Old Guard was nearly everything. Ron Moore and Ira Behr also needed scapegoats and blame Berman for everything (though in their case they're really just being brats who didn't appreciate how easy they really had it in terms of production) so the fandom followed suit.
Folks dislike them because they need someone to dislike, not because they're actually responsible for what is disliked.
Its funny how you, who never worked on the show, seem to know who has what easy.
Berman was a BIG part of the problem. Ira Behr recalled him and Berman getting in to fierce arguments over elements of DS9. I specifically remember him telling the story about the fight he and Berman had over Nog losing a leg. Berman initially refused to let it happen saying that doing so was inappropriate and not something that should happen on Star Trek. Behr thought the whole argument was stupid. Given the state of Trek medicine it was obvious that Nog would be up walking again in no time….but Berman could not see that. In the end Behr won.
That tells me two things:
1. Berman was really bad at seeing the bigger picture and stifled creativity.
2. It illustrates how important it is to have a show runner with a real creative vision that is willing to fight for good stories instead of being a yes man.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.