Probably but that's after the fact armchair quarterbacking. Who was available to do the job on time and under budget?They weren't doing their job and should have been replaced.
Probably but that's after the fact armchair quarterbacking. Who was available to do the job on time and under budget?They weren't doing their job and should have been replaced.
Honestly, they did actually do a decent job during the time Kes was in the series. Some of it wasn't good but most of it was acceptable.Probably so but, with expception of one season 6 episode, I know far worse things. Mostly in modern Star Wars andf this is just what I know about.
Probably but that's after the fact armchair quarterbacking. Who was available to do the job on time and under budget?
Me either. I think VOY would have been better served keeping them both and losing either Harry Kim or Chakotay. Harry would be the easier boot, there would have been no shake-up in the hierarchy. But Chakotay was a badly conceived character.Agreed here. Seven was a character Jeri totally owned and pushed past the ridiculous sexiness of a Borg character.
But I never resented the character over Kes leaving. That's not a problem with Seven; that's a leadership decision.
Indeed, yes. Maybe subbed in a few people from DS9. People who could form long term storylines, ration torpedoes, and put hollow pips on ensign's collars.They weren't doing their job and should have been replaced.
I'm not asking for people who are elite players... just people who know how the game is played.Probably but that's after the fact armchair quarterbacking. Who was available to do the job on time and under budget?
Indeed, yes. Maybe subbed in a few people from DS9. People who could form long term storylines, ration torpedoes, and put hollow pips on ensign's collars.
Writer's block is a thing.However, I always found it wrird that they all of a sudden lost the ability to write for the character when they had done a decent job for three years-unless they were ordered to lose the ability to write for the character.
Or more like...Janeway: "Over the last two months, by more carefully rationing our torpedoes, our torpedo reserves have increased from negative seven to plus 3. Some of the metal spared by the rationing has also been used to finally created some rank pips for you. Congratulations, Lt. Jg. Kim!"
It's all about percentage.Writer's block is a thing.
Not everything is evil, mean spirited, or malicious in intent. Sometimes people burn out but don't realize it until it's too late.
I'm really not a fan of the assumption stupidity, incompetence, or maliciousness as motivations for people we don't know.
How do we know what's evil, mean spirited or malicious? I have no way of telling. Some actors hate their characters but still keep going.It's all about percentage.
I don't find it believable at all when it's stated that the whole bunch of writers all of a sudden lost the ability to "come up with stories" for a character.
Not everything is evil, mean spirited, or malicious in intent, but some are.
And someone gives the orders and the staff replies "Yes, Boss!"
Unfortunatlely, it's the impression I get in this case.How do we know what's evil, mean spirited or malicious? I have no way of telling. Some actors hate their characters but still keep going.
I don't see a reason to just call people liars. It's just strange to me.
It's really none of my business to accept or reject. If they're lying why difference is that to me? I wasn't there, and there are so many different factors to production and writing for me to go with malice.someone comes up with three different explanations for one questionable event of which none looks believable and none is actually confirmed in any way, then it's hard for me to simply accept them.
Play a villain or someone morally depraved. Or just an antagonist in a comedy.How can a person possible work with something that the person hates? It must be devastating for the mind and soul.
Indeed. In contrast, look at Larry Linville playing Frank Burns. By all reports, Linville was a sweet guy who was easy to get along with. After 5 years of playing an antagonist to Alda's Hawkeye he got tired of it. Too bad, because they are a lot of hints of a tragic background to his character and could have gone better.Also, sometimes you see a bit of yourself in a character, whether they're good or bad. For me, a good example is Jud in "Oklahoma". He's not a likable man... but he's probably been shaped by years of being universally disliked. It gets to you after awhile.
I don't like when people lie to me. That's it.It's really none of my business to accept or reject. If they're lying why difference is that to me? I wasn't there, and there are so many different factors to production and writing for me to go with malice.
Mileage will vary.
Play a villain or someone morally depraved. Or just an antagonist in a comedy.
There's lots of ways. The workman attitude is very strong in many people and dominated generations of thought. It's only devastating if that's your only reason for being.
I just don't take this case personally since it's not directed personally at me.don't like when people lie to me. That's it.
And you have that luxury. Writers and actors don't always. Nimoy makes a point of that.playing a character I simply find boring or downright disgusting for many reasons or a character in a series which I find uninteresting and boring (like Stargate Universe), no I wouldn't do that.
Which is the right thing to do since the comment wasn't about you.I just don't take this case personally since it's not directed personally at me.
And you have that luxury. Writers and actors don't always. Nimoy makes a point of that.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.