• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

What is your favorite female character from Voyager?

What is your favorite female character from Voyager?

  • B'Elanna Torres

    Votes: 5 15.6%
  • Kes

    Votes: 3 9.4%
  • Seven of Nine

    Votes: 13 40.6%
  • Kathryn Janeway

    Votes: 10 31.3%
  • Seska

    Votes: 1 3.1%
  • Samatha Wildman

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    32
Probably so but, with expception of one season 6 episode, I know far worse things. Mostly in modern Star Wars andf this is just what I know about.
Honestly, they did actually do a decent job during the time Kes was in the series. Some of it wasn't good but most of it was acceptable.

But if the character was dumped due to the explanation that "the writers coiuldn't write for the character", then they weren't doing their job.

However, I always found it wrird that they all of a sudden lost the ability to write for the character when they had done a decent job for three years-unless they were ordered to lose the ability to write for the character.

I must admit that I've seen other cases of bad writing and unnecessary dumping of characters in other series too.

Probably but that's after the fact armchair quarterbacking. Who was available to do the job on time and under budget?

Look at my statement above the quote of your post here.
 
Agreed here. Seven was a character Jeri totally owned and pushed past the ridiculous sexiness of a Borg character.

But I never resented the character over Kes leaving. That's not a problem with Seven; that's a leadership decision.
Me either. I think VOY would have been better served keeping them both and losing either Harry Kim or Chakotay. Harry would be the easier boot, there would have been no shake-up in the hierarchy. But Chakotay was a badly conceived character.

Yes, Lynx, I know you disagree. ;)

And yes, keeping all ten would have been the ideal solution.
They weren't doing their job and should have been replaced.
Indeed, yes. Maybe subbed in a few people from DS9. People who could form long term storylines, ration torpedoes, and put hollow pips on ensign's collars.
Probably but that's after the fact armchair quarterbacking. Who was available to do the job on time and under budget?
I'm not asking for people who are elite players... just people who know how the game is played.
 
Indeed, yes. Maybe subbed in a few people from DS9. People who could form long term storylines, ration torpedoes, and put hollow pips on ensign's collars.


Janeway: "Over the last two months, by more carefully rationing our torpedoes, our torpedo reserves have increased from negative seven to plus 3. Some of the metal spared by the rationing has also been used to finally created some rank pips for you. Congratulations, Lt. Jg. Kim!"
 
However, I always found it wrird that they all of a sudden lost the ability to write for the character when they had done a decent job for three years-unless they were ordered to lose the ability to write for the character.
Writer's block is a thing.

Not everything is evil, mean spirited, or malicious in intent. Sometimes people burn out but don't realize it until it's too late.

I'm really not a fan of the assumption stupidity, incompetence, or maliciousness as motivations for people we don't know.
 
Janeway: "Over the last two months, by more carefully rationing our torpedoes, our torpedo reserves have increased from negative seven to plus 3. Some of the metal spared by the rationing has also been used to finally created some rank pips for you. Congratulations, Lt. Jg. Kim!"
Or more like...

EXT SHOT: Voyager, traveling through space at warp.

JANEWAY: "Captain's log. Our meeting with the Zahl has proven both pleasurable and productive. They are a peaceful and technologically advanced species with weapons technology similar to our own, and have agreed to trade us a pallet of torpedoes. Commander Tuvok is working on reconfiguring them to function in our launchers. In addition to having our weapons reserves restored, we have another event to celebrate."

Cut to:

INT SHOT: Briefing room.

Close up shot of Janeway's hands, sticking a hollow pipe on Kim's collar.

JANEWAY: "As captain of this ship, I promote you to the rank of lieutenant, with all privileges and responsibilities therein."

HARRY (grinning): "Thank you, captain!"
 
Writer's block is a thing.

Not everything is evil, mean spirited, or malicious in intent. Sometimes people burn out but don't realize it until it's too late.

I'm really not a fan of the assumption stupidity, incompetence, or maliciousness as motivations for people we don't know.
It's all about percentage.

I don't find it believable at all when it's stated that the whole bunch of writers all of a sudden lost the ability to "come up with stories" for a character.

Not everything is evil, mean spirited, or malicious in intent, but some are.

And someone gives the orders and the staff replies "Yes, Boss!"
 
It's all about percentage.

I don't find it believable at all when it's stated that the whole bunch of writers all of a sudden lost the ability to "come up with stories" for a character.

Not everything is evil, mean spirited, or malicious in intent, but some are.

And someone gives the orders and the staff replies "Yes, Boss!"
How do we know what's evil, mean spirited or malicious? I have no way of telling. Some actors hate their characters but still keep going.

I don't see a reason to just call people liars. It's just strange to me.
 
How do we know what's evil, mean spirited or malicious? I have no way of telling. Some actors hate their characters but still keep going.

I don't see a reason to just call people liars. It's just strange to me.
Unfortunatlely, it's the impression I get in this case.

If someone comes up with three different explanations for one questionable event of which none looks believable and none is actually confirmed in any way, then it's hard for me to simply accept them.

I need more confirmation from different sources and not only from those who caused the event.

As for actors who hate their characters, I must admit that I don't understand them.

How can a person possible work with something that the person hates? It must be devastating for the mind and soul.

If i was an actor and disliked the character I'm supposed to play, then I would quit and find another series, movies or whatsoever.

Or a different job.

And I would be honest enought to tell the fans: "Sorry, I just can't do this anymore!"
 
It really depends on the nature of the character. If I was playing a really despicable villain, I might not like the character, but I would certainly play him. Because a good story needs a worthy antagonist.
 
someone comes up with three different explanations for one questionable event of which none looks believable and none is actually confirmed in any way, then it's hard for me to simply accept them.
It's really none of my business to accept or reject. If they're lying why difference is that to me? I wasn't there, and there are so many different factors to production and writing for me to go with malice.

Mileage will vary.


How can a person possible work with something that the person hates? It must be devastating for the mind and soul.
Play a villain or someone morally depraved. Or just an antagonist in a comedy.

There's lots of ways. The workman attitude is very strong in many people and dominated generations of thought. It's only devastating if that's your only reason for being.
 
Also, sometimes you see a bit of yourself in a character, whether they're good or bad. For me, a good example is Jud in "Oklahoma". He's not a likable man... but he's probably been shaped by years of being universally disliked. It gets to you after awhile.
 
Also, sometimes you see a bit of yourself in a character, whether they're good or bad. For me, a good example is Jud in "Oklahoma". He's not a likable man... but he's probably been shaped by years of being universally disliked. It gets to you after awhile.
Indeed. In contrast, look at Larry Linville playing Frank Burns. By all reports, Linville was a sweet guy who was easy to get along with. After 5 years of playing an antagonist to Alda's Hawkeye he got tired of it. Too bad, because they are a lot of hints of a tragic background to his character and could have gone better.
 
It's really none of my business to accept or reject. If they're lying why difference is that to me? I wasn't there, and there are so many different factors to production and writing for me to go with malice.

Mileage will vary.
I don't like when people lie to me. That's it.

Play a villain or someone morally depraved. Or just an antagonist in a comedy.

There's lots of ways. The workman attitude is very strong in many people and dominated generations of thought. It's only devastating if that's your only reason for being.

Due to my twisted sense of humor, I would really love to play an out-flipped dictator or a bad guy in a movie or series.

Something like what Harris Yulin (Marritza in the DS9 episode Duet) did in a Western series called The Macahans when he played the villain Deek Peasley, a character who was so slimy, cunning and unsympathetic that he actually was funny.

Or that guy in a series i once watched who hold hostages in a police station of all places. When the main character, a police officer demanded that "I want all hostages released", the guy just looked at him and said: "And I want a pony!"

That was funny!

But playing a character I simply find boring or downright disgusting for many reasons or a character in a series which I find uninteresting and boring (like Stargate Universe), no I wouldn't do that.

And I would never play music in a band whose musical style I find lousy. In that case I rather have just an ordinary job.
 
don't like when people lie to me. That's it.
I just don't take this case personally since it's not directed personally at me.


playing a character I simply find boring or downright disgusting for many reasons or a character in a series which I find uninteresting and boring (like Stargate Universe), no I wouldn't do that.
And you have that luxury. Writers and actors don't always. Nimoy makes a point of that.

Regardless, people do jobs they hate all the time. Writing is no different.
 
I just don't take this case personally since it's not directed personally at me.
Which is the right thing to do since the comment wasn't about you.
I have never considered you as a liar.

And you have that luxury. Writers and actors don't always. Nimoy makes a point of that.

Regardless, people do jobs they hate all the time. Writing is no different.
[/QUOTE]
Yes, I have that luxury but even writers and actors can actually quit if they don't like what orders they get when it comes to the writing or how the character they play is developed.

And yes, people do jobe they hate. But writing is something which has to be done with interest and inspiration, otherwise it will be sub-standard and downright bad.

I've been doing a lot of writing and my best worh have been done when I've really had had my heart into it.

I've actually done a few things which I was ordered to do in or just had to do which I didn't have the slightest interest or inspiration. They were so bad that I still refuse to read them, i didn't even put my name under the text, instead I used an alias.

But they were exceptions, certain on-off articles which I did only because I promised someone that I would do it when no one else could or would or for a nice sum of money. I would never do it all the time.
 
Some artists have the luxury of choosing what projects to do. Others have to take whatever work's available. And as AI's get more capable, it's going to get worse.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top