• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Why do people say that FC's Cochrane was a dig at Roddenberr

Re: Why do people say that FC's Cochrane was a dig at Rodden

Kegek said:
blockaderunner said:
You know, when you think about it, Cochrane didn't say that. Riker did.
But as you point out, Riker was repeating what he read in a history book, and Cochrane was repeating what he heard Riker say... they both copied each other but neither came up with the phrase first, Riker's claim is about the same as Cochrane's, which may be nothing at all...

Ah, temporal paradoxes. ;)

Hey, Cochrane just got the line from a speech writer who'd heard it in some other speech. So that makes him a politician, but that's forgiveable (in most cases).
 
Re: Why do people say that FC's Cochrane was a dig at Rodden

Kegek said:
blockaderunner said:
You know, when you think about it, Cochrane didn't say that. Riker did.
But as you point out, Riker was repeating what he read in a history book, and Cochrane was repeating what he heard Riker say... they both copied each other but neither came up with the phrase first, Riker's claim is about the same as Cochrane's, which may be nothing at all...

Ah, temporal paradoxes. ;)

So where'd it come from??? :brickwall:
 
Re: Why do people say that FC's Cochrane was a dig at Rodden

^ [Kosh] Yes... [/Kosh] ;)

Gotta love temporal mechanics!! :thumbsup:

Cheers,
-CM-
 
Re: Why do people say that FC's Cochrane was a dig at Rodden

*Peach prepares to rip arms off...* Temporal mechanics gives me headaches.
 
Re: Why do people say that FC's Cochrane was a dig at Rodden

Interesting comparison, I didn't see that as being a direct dig at Roddenberry though, rather it was the comparison with the TOS Cochrane that I found most pressing as a ST fan.
 
Re: Why do people say that FC's Cochrane was a dig at Rodden

blockaderunner said:
Kegek said:
blockaderunner said:
You know, when you think about it, Cochrane didn't say that. Riker did.
But as you point out, Riker was repeating what he read in a history book, and Cochrane was repeating what he heard Riker say... they both copied each other but neither came up with the phrase first, Riker's claim is about the same as Cochrane's, which may be nothing at all...

Ah, temporal paradoxes. ;)

So where'd it come from??? :brickwall:
It's a paradox.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top