Kegek said:
But as you point out, Riker was repeating what he read in a history book, and Cochrane was repeating what he heard Riker say... they both copied each other but neither came up with the phrase first, Riker's claim is about the same as Cochrane's, which may be nothing at all...blockaderunner said:
You know, when you think about it, Cochrane didn't say that. Riker did.
Ah, temporal paradoxes.![]()
Kegek said:
But as you point out, Riker was repeating what he read in a history book, and Cochrane was repeating what he heard Riker say... they both copied each other but neither came up with the phrase first, Riker's claim is about the same as Cochrane's, which may be nothing at all...blockaderunner said:
You know, when you think about it, Cochrane didn't say that. Riker did.
Ah, temporal paradoxes.![]()
It's a paradox.blockaderunner said:
Kegek said:
But as you point out, Riker was repeating what he read in a history book, and Cochrane was repeating what he heard Riker say... they both copied each other but neither came up with the phrase first, Riker's claim is about the same as Cochrane's, which may be nothing at all...blockaderunner said:
You know, when you think about it, Cochrane didn't say that. Riker did.
Ah, temporal paradoxes.![]()
So where'd it come from???![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.