• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Who is sympathetic to the Klingons?

The problem with analogies to the real world is any such view of current politics is likely to contain bias and misunderstanding.

The UFP is seen as analogous to the modern West, the USA or NATO in particular, but that is problematic, because the UFP is supposed to be relatively utopian, where as NATO and the USA have more baggage than truly self-less, pure, noble and un-self-interested pursuits. Just take NATO, who insisted they were a peaceful pact who in no-way were anti-Soviet (which from the Soviet perspective was suspect, considering they had heard this before from the Anti-Comitern Pact, and also that a number of the NATO countries were the ones who had attacked the Soviet Union by intervening in the Russian Civil War). When Stalin asked to join NATO, the Soviets were rebuffed, thus in the Soviet mind believing that NATO was exposed as an anti-Soviet pact, who were not going to be up to any good in relation to Russia and the other republics. this tension continues today, because although NATO existed supposedly against the Soviet threat, there is no more Soviet Union but there still is NATO. James Baker III (US Secretary of State) and Eduard Shevardnadze, his Soviet counterpart reached an agreement at Jacksonhole that the Soviet Union would not use force to keep the waster bloc propped up and in return the US would not have NATO go pst Berlin, no one inch east. But Germany reunited, and the New Germany was part of NATO, so it went east. Presidents Clinton, GW Bush and Obama all signed more eastern nations into NATO. While I am no fan of the corrupt Russian Federation, it is interesting how the West portrays Russia, Putin in particular, as being the aggressor and hostile (reducing historical process tot he will of one single individual's subjectivity). Yet even as NATO just intervened in Libya, created a civil war still on going, a failed state, a humanitarian refugee crisis, etc, NATO insist they come in peace. The actions of the West are not viewed nor portrayed as being hostile, but if you take a moment to step outside bias, it should be clear why other regimes are frightened of the West.

I like the analogy between the Klingons of STD and modern day Russia.

The Federation and NATO both try to cloak themselves in good intentions and as a guarantor of “peace”, while they at the same time aggressively push up against the borders of other powers (Russia, China the Klingon Empire) who can only watch the passive aggression with trepidation and worry.

And while both do lip service to concepts like “diversity”, it’s clear that it’s a diversity very narrowly defined.

A Federation truly devoted to peace and justice, would have no problem with readjusting their borders to ease Klingon worries, just like a NATO truly devoted to peace and being a defensive alliance wouldn’t constantly push up against the borders of other powers.

One thing that counts as a positive for STD I guess, is that for the first time in Trek history, the Klingons vs The Federation isn’t a simple question of evil vs. good.

But of one evil vs a greater evil.
 
A Federation truly devoted to peace and justice, would have no problem with readjusting their borders to ease Klingon worries, just like a NATO truly devoted to peace and being a defensive alliance wouldn’t constantly push up against the borders of other powers.
.

The only reason that NATO "pushes up against the borders" of Russia is because nations that border Russia like Poland and the Baltic states are scared as hell of the Russians controlling them again.
Russia has only its past to blame for that fear and thus NATO expansion. I would say the same would apply to the Klingons.
 
The only reason that NATO "pushes up against the borders" of Russia is because nations that border Russia like Poland and the Baltic states are scared as hell of the Russians controlling them again.
Russia has only its past to blame for that fear and thus NATO expansion. I would say the same would apply to the Klingons.

Change Poland with Cuba and Russia with USA and you’ve got exactly the same situation in 1962.
 
While I mentioned the NATO analogy myself it's also B.S. It's space. Space is really really frigging big. There's no analogue to a border situation.

But yes, in real life, many powers DO have serious issues with their neighbors building powerful military and economic alliances.

Turkey and the EU for a less threatening example.
 
Castro was worse.

One should not confuse understanding for condoning. One is entirely capable of thinking Klingons and authoritarian totalitarian regimes are awful people but noting the methods used to combat them can and have been terrible as well. Which is I suspect what we'll get with Section 31 vs. The Klingons.
 
One should not confuse understanding for condoning. One is entirely capable of thinking Klingons and authoritarian totalitarian regimes are awful people but noting the methods used to combat them can and have been terrible as well. Which is I suspect what we'll get with Section 31 vs. The Klingons.
Clearly if you are sympathetic, you completely condone any behaviors by that person, race or nation.
 
Clearly if you are sympathetic, you completely condone any behaviors by that person, race or nation.

This is true.

KILL THE FEDERATION DOGS! RISE UP, SONS OF KAHLESS! SLAUGHTER THEM! SLAUGHTER THEM ALL!

Odd fact, before this show started I'd just started a D20 Star Trek game about Klingon terrorists versus the Federation.
 
One should not confuse understanding for condoning. One is entirely capable of thinking Klingons and authoritarian totalitarian regimes are awful people but noting the methods used to combat them can and have been terrible as well. Which is I suspect what we'll get with Section 31 vs. The Klingons.

Has the "Section 31 in Discovery" actually been confirmed onscreen or is it all speculation at this point?
 
Well, in ENT they were depicted as being behind the covert attempt to stabilize the Klingon Empire by helping find a cure for the Augment virus. Harris and Section 31 were working with Krell and the Klingons to eradicate the Levodian flu outbreak that would have killed untold millions and completely disrupted the Empire had it not been stopped. We never saw the hands of the early Section 31 in anything else, we just know that Malcolm worked for them before he joined Enterprise and that means they were operating as Earth's covert domestic and offworld intelligence service prior to 2151.
 
Has the "Section 31 in Discovery" actually been confirmed onscreen or is it all speculation at this point?
It's all speculation, nothing more. Nobody would have even thought of them in the first place if not for the fact that the Discovery's registry number has 31 in it.

And not even Section 31 is THAT sloppy. :lol:

they were operating as Earth's covert domestic and offworld intelligence service prior to 2151.

Starfleet Intelligence is the only legitimate organization. They can operate covertly when they need to, but they can still get it done legally. Section 31 is nothing more than terrorism. (Even if they themselves don't realize it.)
 
Last edited:
Fleet Admiral Krell sure owned Harris, didn't he? Suckered him into doing the dirty work for the Klingons and then dumped him like last week's gagh.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top